vB Easy Archive - Best Cell Phone Reception -- Nokia v. Motorola

Pages: 1

Best Cell Phone Reception -- Nokia v. Motorola
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: saweiss851

i'm on verizon wireless in DC. i have used LG and Samsung phones and they both are the pits. i'm now looking at the motorola RAZR vm3, the motorola v325, and the nokia 6315i. i love all the bells and whistles, but frankly the most impt criteria this time around is to make calls clearly and without drop-outs. any recommendations?

thx

steve weiss

Posted by: rockalittle

My experience with nokia and motorola was excellent reception with both. In this case you can probably just go with the one you like best appearance/gadget wise. I should mention that my daughter has the razr (but not the vm3 version) and the battery life is poor. So you might want to look into that before buying. Perhaps the vm3 has better battery life than the older models. Good Luck.

Posted by: TalkNokia.com

I think the Nokia is probably the best

Posted by: nokiaman76

Nokia equals pantech meaning there not nokias just a rebadge i go with motorola the v325 is tri mode which gets good signal both motos are good.

Posted by: Jayden0606

Working for a cell phone company. The two best companies for reception would be Sony Ericsson and Nokia. So I would go witht he Nokia.

Posted by: nokiaman76

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayden0606

Working for a cell phone company. The two best companies for reception would be Sony Ericsson and Nokia. So I would go witht he Nokia.

Nokia dont make but the 6236i and the 6256i and think theres another one coming out the ones verizon has now are not made by nokia there made by pantech .