|
Originally Posted by xcharliemx
The iphone is more a pmp (personal media player) and i dont think it should ever be considered a pda
|
|
Originally Posted by wibrandy
I would completely disagree with that statement. Compared to the Blackberry, PalmOS, and WinMo, I think the iPhone has the nicest calendar and contact apps out there. While it's scary to think of iTunes as a sync tool, it just works and works well.
|
|
Originally Posted by drrjv
The term PDA is too general.
Exactly what do you want to do? |
|
Originally Posted by JerryNY
Personal Digital Assistant can mean different things depending on whom you ask.
|
|
Originally Posted by wibrandy
I would completely disagree with that statement. Compared to the Blackberry, PalmOS, and WinMo, I think the iPhone has the nicest calendar and contact apps out there. While it's scary to think of iTunes as a sync tool, it just works and works well.
|
|
Originally Posted by Kar98
Uhm. No, it can't.
PDA noun a palmtop computer used to store information such as addresses and telephone numbers, and for simple word processing and spreadsheeting. |
|
Originally Posted by JerryNY
Um, I can find many different definitions
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by melmac
You cannot use the iPhone in an enterprise or corporate environment. Period. No Exchange support, no Outlook sync (doesn't matter how pretty it is if it don't work with your company's system, and NO corporation uses iTunes LOL), etc, etc, etc = not a PDA replacement.
|
|
Originally Posted by Kar98
They all say what I said.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by wibrandy
I would completely disagree with that statement. Compared to the Blackberry, PalmOS, and WinMo, I think the iPhone has the nicest calendar and contact apps out there. While it's scary to think of iTunes as a sync tool, it just works and works well.
|
|
Originally Posted by toomer
Um, no.
I work for a 30,000+ employee corporation, Nasdaq-100 listed, with offices in several dozen countries ... and we have zero Exchange in our organization. Thousands of us have iPhones and are quite satisfied with them for business use. Still think it is not corporate, "Period." ?? Not every corporation works the same as your little hospital does. |
|
Originally Posted by rickpaul2
ok mr exception to the rule...
|
|
Originally Posted by xcharliemx
The iphone is more a pmp (personal media player) and i dont think it should ever be considered a pda
|
|
Originally Posted by Mesmac
You cannot use the iPhone in an enterprise or corporate environment. Period. No Exchange support, no Outlook sync (doesn't matter how pretty it is if it don't work with your company's system, and NO corporation uses iTunes LOL), etc, etc, etc = not a PDA replacement. It is a phone/iPod, but definately NOT a PDA. I work in IT at a large hospital, and chuckle when people call for support for their iPhones (which we don't support anyways, everyone uses Treo or BB cause they WORK). You can't even get on our wireless guest network with WiFi because Safari can't accept the security certificate.
|
|
Originally Posted by rickpaul2
Yes, the iPhone is indeed a PDA.
Can it keep contacts, a calendar, notes, and a to do list? If so, then it meets the criteria of a PDA. ok mr exception to the rule... The iPhone is not designed for mission critical corporate use. It is incompatible with most corporate infrastructures, and has many mission critical disabilities. Many IT professionals are pulling their hair out because their Supervisors and such force them to try to get their iPhones to integrate with their current infrastructure. It is easy to tell most people "No" but it is more difficult to tell your CEO or supervisor "No". |
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
I don't think Iphone can ever be a good PDA because it does NOT support multi-tasking. Only foreground process is executed while any background processes are put into a limbo (except the ipod music).
|
|
Originally Posted by toomer
Oh my. And where exactly did you get that little gem of misinformation from? Because if you'd used the iPhone for even a few minutes, you'd realize how truly ridiculous that statement is. Heck, even if you hadn't used the phone, just knowing it's running OS X would make "it does NOT support multi-tasking" a really hard argument to sell.
I'd really enjoy seeing a link to someone who has actually tried to make that statement... or is that something you're just pulling out of thin air? Perhaps you should try reading up any of the first few links here to educate yourself further... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...G=Google+Search Which might lead you here... http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=308322 or here... http://www.operationgadget.com/2007...ltitasking.html or, well, here on Apple.com itself... http://www.apple.com/iphone/internet/ "iPhone is fully multi-tasking, so you can read a web page while downloading your email in the background over Wi-Fi or EDGE." |
|
But it is not the worst thing. Today’s smartphones are characterized by a tiny feature that brings them together – multitasking. Even feature phones are coming to grips with it – platforms A100, A200 Sony Ericsson, Nokia S40 5th Edition FP2 (Q1, Q2, 2008) and later on – Motorola’s LJ. The iPhone has not multitasking whatsoever, of course if you don’t count its ability to play music in background mode. In a word, you can’t handle your mail and organizer at the same time, switching between them, copying data from the latter and pasting it into letters, adding some notes etc. This means the iPhone doesn’t have to goods to allow you manage your time with ease. Instead of that, you are down to perform one task in one sitting. Is that bad? By no means, there is nothing to be ashamed of, many phones can’t do that either. So, we finally come to the verdict that the iPhone is not a smartphone but a feature phone remarkable solely for its touch-sensitive display. |
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
I don't think Iphone can ever be a good PDA because it does NOT support multi-tasking. Only foreground process is executed while any background processes are put into a limbo (except the ipod music).
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
There were many things that was in SJ keynote that didnt really make to the iphone, isnt it? My statement was based on these user experience.
|
|
Originally Posted by JerryNY
Where is this confirmed that the iPhone is treating running processes this way? I get email when I am surfing or doing other things so those processes are not put into limbo.
|
|
That isn't multitasking that is serial task switching. The iPhone can switch between apps as fast as you can click the home button and jump to another. You'd better hope that Apple doesn't implement copy and paste because with the speed of the GUI and the relatively fast CPU in the iPhone it would be the king of this so-called multitasking. |
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
For iphone, the cpu is fully dedicated to the current foreground task.
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
That does not make it a true multi-tasking OS. Unlike WM/Symbian, Iphone OS behaves like Palm OS or Windows 3.1.
|
. Palm had that limitation of "suspending" applications when using something else. I use to really hate that. I hope something about this is untrue or else I could get that Centro Treo 800 or whatever Sprint has coming in October instead. I ditched my iphone but miss it truly for its multimedia capabilities. I'm on a lightning fast Blackberry Curve that does pretty much everything I need it to do. Just quite boring and small compared to the GIGANTIC iphone SEXYNESS SCREEN.
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Email/sms notification comes thru the gsm/edge stack. That's just a popup notification and may not have anything to do with email/sms program (i.e even if your email/sms prog is not started the notification still come thru).
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
But can the browser continues to load pages in the background while you are doing other stuff like PIMs?
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Or if you load up multi-pages in multi-tab, does all the pages load simultaneously
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Will you be able to start a new SMS while the current one is being send. From mobile-review.com review, you cannot do that.
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Or can you type a new email while the current one is being sent or new emails being retrieved?
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
For iphone, the cpu is fully dedicated to the current foreground task.
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Unlike WM/Symbian, Iphone OS behaves like Palm OS or Windows 3.1.
|
|
Originally Posted by mib1800
Or can you type a new email while the current one is being sent or new emails being retrieved?
|
|
Originally Posted by FlyPenFly
By this definition Symbian S60 isn't a true multitasking OS either. Have you ever even used Windows 3.1?
Besides, I've put "Mail" in the background and had it notify of emails and not through auto-check, that is it checked email while I went to a New Email screen. Palm OS and the iPhone DO TASKS IN THE BACKGROUND. IT IS MULTI-TASKING. PocketTune and the music function are BACKGROUND TASKS. |
|
Originally Posted by sr1329
Why not? On S60 you can have Symtorrent downloading bit torrent files while composing and sending e-mails or watching video or surfing the net all simultaneously.
|
| Has the update fixed the crashing of the ipod/music player while web browsing? haha. |
|
Originally Posted by wibrandy
I would completely disagree with that statement. Compared to the Blackberry, PalmOS, and WinMo, I think the iPhone has the nicest calendar and contact apps out there. While it's scary to think of iTunes as a sync tool, it just works and works well.
|
|
Originally Posted by sr1329
Why not? On S60 you can have Symtorrent downloading bit torrent files while composing and sending e-mails or watching video or surfing the net all simultaneously.
|
|
Originally Posted by sr1329
Why not? On S60 you can have Symtorrent downloading bit torrent files while composing and sending e-mails or watching video or surfing the net all simultaneously.
|
|
Originally Posted by parsec
Good grief people. I got so frustrated reading this thread that I couldn't finish it, so I appologize if this has already been pointed out. The OP didn't post to start some essoteric debate about whether the iPhone is a PDA or not. Did anyone bother to read beyond the topic? He's asking if he can activate the iPhone and use the non-phone features without signing up for service from AT&T. He even clarified in a later post that he just wants to sync his calander with OS X's iCal. The answer is yes. Check here.
As for everyone else, I don't know what to say. Some people just seem so eager to bash the iPhone that they'll do it in whatever thread they can. There are plenty of threads in this forum debating the merits of the iPhone. If you want to bash or defend it, do it there. Otherwise, answer the OP's original question and move on. |
|
Originally Posted by GeeK.dLL
You can use this to unlock it so you can use it without activating it. It worked for me
http://www.pqdvd.net/iphone-unlock-toolkit.html |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser