
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
18 dollars for an upgrade is fine. Just don't be sneaky, and don't lie. It is a handling fee for Cingular/AT&T to keep stock of phones for customer upgrades. It is a fee for swapping the SIM for the customer.
|
|
Originally Posted by The Champ
It's a standard fee for every mobile carrier...why is everyone making it seem like ATT is the only company?
I saw someone else mention it, but why the big debate? EVERY CARRIER HAS A FEE...is it that big of a deal? |
|
Originally Posted by JP Whoregan
If people don't like the way wireless carriers do business, they should start carrying around CB radios.
|
"That's a 10-4 on that Good Buddy!"
|
Originally Posted by cingtd
Some people just like to take pot shots without looking at the big picture especially when it is something they can't control.
|
| I saw someone else mention it, but why the big debate? EVERY CARRIER HAS A FEE...is it that big of a deal? |
|
Originally Posted by cingman66
The answer to this question is very simple: AT&T uses the Upgrade fee (and the Activation fee, Transfer of Service fee, Number Change fee, etc. for that matter) for one reason--to help pay their CS staff and for the software they use to run the business (CARE or Telegence).
|
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
And it has been stated that other carriers do NOT have this fee. Even CDMA carriers (Verizon) at that.
|
My point being, it is a worthless fee, Verizon waves it on plans over 39.99 (do they even have any?) and other carriers don't even have this fee.|
Originally Posted by Isriam
JP and Cingtd, do you really think people are moaning for no reason, and that 18 dollars is chump change? If you think that there is no reason to balk at the $18, then please, paypal me $18 right now for no reason other than being here.
I don't understand why someone could ask why they are paying $18 and it turns into they are *****ing and moaning for no reason. There really is no reason for the fee, and we all know that. It is straight profit for moving a SIM from one phone to another. And it has been stated that other carriers do NOT have this fee. Even CDMA carriers (Verizon) at that. The reason this debate interests me, is because recently the City of San Diego took it upon themselves to ban drinking on all beaches in the county. Now, this is far from an 18 dollar fee. It is free. But I still am not going to sit back and let the City of San Diego take this away from me without "*****ing and moaning". I went to town meetings and expressed my concern, and what I wanted. You can say this isn't the same thing, but the idea here is that if there is something you disagree with, you make your points known, and hope the higher up people will actually listen to those who their policies affect. I don't see your points in attacking people who express their concern about an illogical fee. Give me a valid reason this fee exists other than "it is something they can't control.". |
|
Originally Posted by cingtd
No disrespect but a consumer is not required to pay an upgrade fee unless they are upgrading their equipment at a discounted price. It is that simple. In some cases consumers have the upgrade fee automatically waived (depending on several factors including: average monthly cost, payment history, tenure for example). I won't attempt to justify it but as an employee I am obligated to enforce it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
My point being, it is a worthless fee, Verizon waves it on plans over 39.99?
|
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
and other carriers don't even have this fee.
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
1) Cingular leads you to believe the fee goes towards actions or a process carried out on their part that gets your new phone communicating with the network. This is a lie.
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
That article links to the previously locked thread in this section concerning this topic, and pulls quotes. That's how I found this place, and the sole reason I created an account was to voice my opinion on the topic, in hopes of getting a better explanation. At least this attempt resulted in someone admitting it has nothing to do with "upgrading" your phone (as if it wasn't already painfully obvious), instead of vague answer after answer to prevent the customer from realizing they can get a phone elsewhere and avoid this fee.
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Once again, the "us vs. them" mentality is going to kick in, and people are going to say, "What, you don't like being lied to. Oh, you are just a complainer! Go away!". That's fine, but just wait until this company that you so strongly defend starts to pull the same tactics on their employees. Then, I think you may be singing a different tune.
If this post causes me to get ban, that's fine, as this will most likely be my last post regardless. As a matter of fact, please go ahead and do so. As I said, the sole reason for signing up was to voice my opinion about this, in hopes of getting a real answer from who I assumed would be smarter, more logical, and honest than the multiple reps I've asked on the phone. Go ahead, flame away. Those who reply with "$18 isn't that much", or "just go get a phone elsewhere" obviously didn't read and/or understand my previous posts. An oh, thanks to the few who pushed aside the "us vs them" mentality and said, "You know, you're right, it is sneaky, and I can understand where you are coming from". |
|
Originally Posted by cingman66
The answer to this question is very simple: AT&T uses the Upgrade fee (and the Activation fee, Transfer of Service fee, Number Change fee, etc. for that matter) for one reason--to help pay their CS staff and for the software they use to run the business (CARE or Telegence). Computer systems do not pay for themselves, and CS reps do not generate any business to cover their salaries either. The various fees AT&T (and other carriers) charge are simply to keep the business going. What more explanation do you need? Cable companies (and land-line telephone companies) charge a fee to "connect" your service--typically called an "installation fee." This is more BS than any of AT&T's fees. These companies don't even send anyone to your house...they just flip a switch and boom, your connected.
|
|
Originally Posted by ivwshane
Ahh...so thats how you came to be a mod!
Excellent reply! |
|
Originally Posted by Really_Annoyed
If AT&T needs this fee to keep the business running, shouldn't it just increase the price it charges for different plan? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of charging for product/service to cover the expense of doing business and hopefully make a profit on top of it? What's the point of charging too little then have fees for XXX and YYY?
|
|
Originally Posted by ivwshane
Alright here is the deal: The $18 upgrade fee is a finance fee, as in a fee created by the finance department to bring in additional revenue for the company, period!.
Debating this fee is useless and will result in nothing being changed, you either understand this or you don't, either way, get over it already. If you have a problem with this fee then put your money where your mouth is, when your contract is up go to a different carrier. Taking away all revenue from a company is the only way change will happen and if you aren't prepared to make that sacrifice then $18 really isn't that big of a deal to you. |

|
Originally Posted by .7
na, im retired, I just peek my head in from time to time
The wording of your statement is a little weird but I think your suggesting is that ATT should increase their rates of service instead of charging that upgrade fee. Again, I don't know for sure but I think the reasoning behind this is a little more simple and straight forward. Price point is a very important factor in purchasing both visually and monetarily (ever wonder why walmart prices a lot of their items at $XX.97), Pricing their service so much as a penny higher on the main rate plans would be putting themselves at a HUGE disadvantage against their main competitor (Verizon). You also see this with rebates where legally they can advertise a significant low price for the item yet make you do the leg work to get your entire savings (which a lot of people don't end up mailing in rebates). Its all a balancing acts with rebates, advertised price, additional fees for the transaction with the end result being the upgrade to a new phone, balancing an attractive price for the customer with the least amount of concessions on the sellers end. Without getting into the whole inner workings of retail pricing (to which I am no expert) I hope that makes a little sense in the end. |
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
I agree completely that the fee is probably covering cost of shipping, storefront, and stock. I just think that AT&T could save themselves, consumers, AND employee's a lot of hassle by finding a way to handle it other than tacking it on secretly. A lot of employee's have recognized that and taken most of the secrecy out of the equation.
|
|
Originally Posted by .7
While I don’t pretend to know the ins and outs of AT&T process enough to know what that money is used for, how exactly do you know the facts of the situation to come to the conclusion that its a "lie"? Let’s say, for example, that AT&T determines that in conjunction with the upgrade at a subsidized price it cost them $25 in a specific calculation of their choice. Let’s say they take the commission paid to the rep to upgrade (or shipping costs if its shipped from telesales), the cost to ship the phone to retail, the cost of the overhead to house that phone in store or warehouse, so on and so on. Then let’s say they (ATT) calculate that in their accounting to them the subsidy on the phone itself is absorbed in the revenue increase that will occur over the tenure of the new contract.
Now, I will concede that you can probably poke holes in that theory all day long but the point I’m trying to make here is this. ‘If” a like scenario is the way AT&T does “business” than who are you to say that such a fee to recoup a loss for a like business scenario is a “lie”? You have every right to question the fee and its validity, but let’s be honest, you don’t know more if it’s a lie than I know it’s the truth. |
|
Originally Posted by .7
While I don’t think you are out of line with what you’re saying, I have to ask what you are really looking for here. I mean, in reading your posts you mentioned a couple times that you want a “straight answer” but at the end of the day I’m not too convinced that’s what you really want. I mean, if Ralph De La Vega himself told you that the fee is this and that would you, Isriam, or anyone else that has a bone to pick with this fee really be satisfied? The fee is there and you disagree with it and I don’t think a fluffy explanation from anyone is going to change that. I feel that you simply don’t like it and you want to be heard, not necessarily some grand search for the “truth” as you want to see it. Some of you are content to pound your fist into the sand and say it isn’t right, and if that be your choice than so be it.
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Hi .7. I really wanted to be done with this, but I cannot resist replying to your level-headed, logical replies that directly address my points. Thank you.
First of all, let me clarify that I do not do any business in the stores, so every experience I speak of deals with talking to a non-local CSRs on the phone. As stated before, when asked, the CSR will make you believe that the $18 is going towards a specific action or process *needed* in order to get the phone you are about to purchase “talking” to the network. They make it seem as if they have to fill out 2 pages of forms and flip a switch. The name “upgrade fee” also implies this fee covers specific actions that need to take place in order to upgrade your phone. The mystery behind this charge has been something I’ve poked CSRs with for years, and this is the first line reply I have always received. I’ve also spoken to managers (or at least what the CSR told me were managers) to probe for answers. This has never lead to a more definitive answer. They try really hard to make you believe this, and most people would just buy that answer, because they don’t know any better. When pressed harder with logic such as, “I don’t understand. If I get a phone from ebay, why don’t you have to do this processing in order for my phone to work?” Then, they will start pulling for answers, “Umm, it also covers copying contacts for you, etc.”, rebutted with, “But I’m buying the phone from you online. I’m doing all this myself.” And it continues on. At this point, they are frustrated and mad, because they really don’t know what else to say. Every single reason they give, I can poke a hole right through. This is lying because all the reasons they give are not valid; they are not the real reason the fee is charged. If these answers were the truth, I would not be able to poke holes in them. Like others have said, I believe the reason the fee is charged is to simply speed up the process of making their money back. This is something they will never tell you, especially since the name of the charge implies something very different. You can very loosely apply the term “upgrade fee” to whatever scenario you wish, but unless they explain this to you when you ask, they are lying. I don’t think a valid explanation for a charge is too much to ask. If you get your oil changed, and the paper work shows an additional charge with a misleading name, would you ask about it? If every explanation they give you, you are able to reply with something that makes their explanation not valid, would you believe they are lying to you about what the charge is really for? You are wrong when you question what my intentions are. As stated before, 1) to voice my opinion (with an obvious underlying tone of frustration) surrounding the matter, and 2) search for a better (honest) answer that I cannot poke a hole through. I believe a few have finally coughed it up, and, along with a few assumptions, I’ve been able to piece everything together in my head. I’ve said before that the charge is not what I have a problem with. When I’m spending $400 for a phone, another $18 is chump change. It is the deception surrounding the charge that I have a problem with. If Ralph De La Vaga explained that the charge was to speed up the process of getting their money back, I’d thank him for the honest answer and move on to my next point. You can doubt this all you like, but with all due respect, I know me a little better than you know me. The next point would be, “Why not increase the price of the phone rather than have this somewhat hidden charge?” This is interesting, because, what I believe to be the answer to this question further supports my argument that the $18 upgrade charge pays for nothing more than what the amount on the phone’s price tag pays for – it should really be combined. But due to the competitive market, they must manipulate numbers to give the illusion you got the phone for this amount, and then this amount goes towards “upgrading” you. One problem with this is it’s not always disclosed when discussing the purchase of the phone. One salesman even admitted in the other thread he makes a point to not bring it up. The internet is littered with complaints of the same thing. However, this second point is less of an issue. The main issue is the deception surrounding the upgrade fee. I simply refuse to pay this fee if the best answer the sales person can give me can quickly be dismissed. |
|
Originally Posted by classylady78
Do you work at AT&T? If the answer is no, you should not be posting here PERIOD.
This is a good thread and you are going to get it locked again. If you want to post your frustrations with the $18 fee this is not the area to do so. |
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Quote:
Classylady, go read the rules. Thanks. I've PM'd with mods, and everything is fine. The mod that wrote the rules quoted me which sparked a reply. He also stated in this post, that I was not out of line, after I asked them to ban me. Thanks again, classy. |
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Classylady, go read the rules. Thanks.
I've PM'd with mods, and everything is fine. The mod that wrote the rules quoted me which sparked a reply. He also stated in this post, that I was not out of line, after I asked them to ban me. Thanks again, classy. |
|
Originally Posted by .7
Price point is a very important factor in purchasing both visually and monetarily (ever wonder why walmart prices a lot of their items at $XX.97), Pricing their service so much as a penny higher on the main rate plans would be putting themselves at a HUGE disadvantage against their main competitor (Verizon). You also see this with rebates where legally they can advertise a significant low price for the item yet make you do the leg work to get your entire savings (which a lot of people don't end up mailing in rebates). Its all a balancing acts with rebates, advertised price, additional fees for the transaction with the end result being the upgrade to a new phone, balancing an attractive price for the customer with the least amount of concessions on the sellers end.
|
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
I have no problem with what the fee is for if it is said exactly why and what it covers. I haven't heard anything except it is "profit"
|
|
Originally Posted by classylady78
So we get to read pages and pages of you complaining about the upgrade fee. I would rather read posts about what the $18 fee really goes to. But instead I will have to read your complaining for pages. Thanks!
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Hi .7. I really wanted to be done with this, but I cannot resist replying to your level-headed, logical replies that directly address my points. Thank you.
First of all, let me clarify that I do not do any business in the stores, so every experience I speak of deals with talking to a non-local CSRs on the phone. As stated before, when asked, the CSR will make you believe that the $18 is going towards a specific action or process *needed* in order to get the phone you are about to purchase “talking” to the network. They make it seem as if they have to fill out 2 pages of forms and flip a switch. The name “upgrade fee” also implies this fee covers specific actions that need to take place in order to upgrade your phone. The mystery behind this charge has been something I’ve poked CSRs with for years, and this is the first line reply I have always received. I’ve also spoken to managers (or at least what the CSR told me were managers) to probe for answers. This has never lead to a more definitive answer. |
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
They try really hard to make you believe this, and most people would just buy that answer, because they don’t know any better. When pressed harder with logic such as, “I don’t understand. If I get a phone from ebay, why don’t you have to do this processing in order for my phone to work?” Then, they will start pulling for answers, “Umm, it also covers copying contacts for you, etc.”, rebutted with, “But I’m buying the phone from you online. I’m doing all this myself.” And it continues on. At this point, they are frustrated and mad, because they really don’t know what else to say. Every single reason they give, I can poke a hole right through.
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
This is lying because all the reasons they give are not valid; they are not the real reason the fee is charged. If these answers were the truth, I would not be able to poke holes in them. Like others have said, I believe the reason the fee is charged is to simply speed up the process of making their money back. This is something they will never tell you, especially since the name of the charge implies something very different.
You can very loosely apply the term “upgrade fee” to whatever scenario you wish, but unless they explain this to you when you ask, they are lying. I don’t think a valid explanation for a charge is too much to ask. If you get your oil changed, and the paper work shows an additional charge with a misleading name, would you ask about it? If every explanation they give you, you are able to reply with something that makes their explanation not valid, would you believe they are lying to you about what the charge is really for? |
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
You are wrong when you question what my intentions are. As stated before, 1) to voice my opinion (with an obvious underlying tone of frustration) surrounding the matter, and 2) search for a better (honest) answer that I cannot poke a hole through. I believe a few have finally coughed it up, and, along with a few assumptions, I’ve been able to piece everything together in my head.
I’ve said before that the charge is not what I have a problem with. When I’m spending $400 for a phone, another $18 is chump change. It is the deception surrounding the charge that I have a problem with. If Ralph De La Vaga explained that the charge was to speed up the process of getting their money back, I’d thank him for the honest answer and move on to my next point. You can doubt this all you like, but with all due respect, I know me a little better than you know me. The next point would be, “Why not increase the price of the phone rather than have this somewhat hidden charge?” This is interesting, because, what I believe to be the answer to this question further supports my argument that the $18 upgrade charge pays for nothing more than what the amount on the phone’s price tag pays for – it should really be combined. |
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
I simply refuse to pay this fee if the best answer the sales person can give me can quickly be dismissed.
|
|
Originally Posted by Really_Annoyed
I understand about the price points and such. But if we assume this is the reason, then it's a very sleazy practice and one can't help but wonder what other sleazy things is this company doing. Because according to the same logic, a company can advertise $9.99/month plan with 450 min, unlimited M2M & N/W, but there will be a $30/month account maintenance fee. Or even go as far as advertising the plan as free, but charge $10 connection fee, $10 network upkeep fee, $9.99 maintenance fee, and another $10 disguised as a government tax.
I realized this is a bit extreme, but I hope I've made my point clear. To compare the upgrade fee and the activation fee is truly comparing apples to oranges. Activating a new account requires entering credit check info (and port info if necessary), then setting up the account (plans, features, etc.) While I personally feel $36 is a bit much for doing these things, I can understand that there is work done here and I'm charged for this. Fine. But all a rep needs to do for an upgrade is enter the new IMEI # (and SIM # if the rep decides to give you a new SIM), click next a few times, and say "you're total is ...." I know this because I worked there for 3 years. Charging a fee for this is no different than you going into a supermarket, pick up a $2.99 item, and when you go to pay for it, the cashier tells you there will also be a $2 transaction processing fee added on. Like classylady said, we'd really like to find out what the $18 fee really goes to. |

|
Originally Posted by classylady78
So we get to read pages and pages of you complaining about the upgrade fee. I would rather read posts about what the $18 fee really goes to. But instead I will have to read your complaining for pages. Thanks!
|
|
Originally Posted by lili96ilil
Classy, you’re proving yourself to be not very classy at all.
Funny that you quote my post and see nothing but complaining. I look at that same post and see the formulation of the best explanation of what’s going on. Mods, please ban me if that is in order. Thanks, |
|
Originally Posted by .7
And therein lies the beauty of your situation, you can either chose to pay the fee and get the phone from ATT or you can chose to get your phone elsewhere.
|
|
Originally Posted by .7
They should just put out a memo stating the fee is for “fees and costs associated with equipment subsidy and costs” in which the details of could possibly be, by ATT account, what I mentioned in my previous posts.
|
|
Originally Posted by .7
And therein lies the beauty of your situation, you can either chose to pay the fee and get the phone from ATT or you can chose to get your phone elsewhere.
|
|
Originally Posted by ATnt-RSC
In that sense, I was incorrect in stating it's pure profit. It isn't. It's pure income, but it will be spent wisely on services that will help AT&T customers AND shareholders.
|
| Point #2 is in regards to fees in general--we all pay them (ATM's, Ticketmaster, Cable, Cell phone, etc.) and we hardly know what they are for or agree with them. We just accept them as part of "the cost of doing business." Whether it is a "convenience" charge (such as getting tickets on-line rather than in-person) or a stupid "remote rental" fee we pay to the cable company, we all (should) realize that companies are in the business of making money, and occasionally they are going to hit customers with extra fees to help their bottom-line. Our choice as consumers, as has been mentioned several times already, is to either accept defeat and pay these ridiculous fees, or take our business elsewhere. Waiting for AT&T, or any company for that matter, to give you a reasonable explanation for these fees is a fool's game. It will never happen. |
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
i disagree. remember when checking accounts charged fee's or credit cards had annual fee's? everything can change
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
Almost every bank in the US has free checking, savings, and ATM/Visa now. I would never pay my bank to hold my money. I would never pay a carrier to "sell" me a phone.
|
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
Almost every bank in the US has free checking, savings, and ATM/Visa now. I would never pay my bank to hold my money. I would never pay a carrier to "sell" me a phone.
|
| -are you serious? I checked most of the banks in my area recently when I opened up a new account, and "almost all" of them DO charge for checking...unless you deposit enough money with them...........So please, keep your generalizations to ones that are actually close to being true. |
|
Originally Posted by Isriam
Can we get back on topic? I haven't seen a good reason why this fee should be assessed to customers.
Bank of America MyAccess Checking® Special Offer - Free Special Online Only Offer for a limited time FREE with no direct deposit requirement No minimum balance required Wells Fargo Fee waived with Direct Deposit, or with $1,000 minimum daily balance Otherwise, $5 Washington Mutual WaMu Free Checking™ Free ATM cash withdrawals worldwide details Free checks—for life! details Free Gold Debit MasterCard® with rewards details One free Overdraft or Bounced Check Fee refund each year Free outgoing wire transfers worldwide details I wonder what those details are? Wachovia Discover the Benefits of Free Checking No minimum balance requirement No monthly service fee Free Check Card with free Wachovia Possibilities RewardsSM Unlimited use of Wachovia ATMs Free automated telephone service Unlimited check writing Account security and protection Free Online Banking with BillPay, Balance Alerts, and Online Statements |
|
Originally Posted by ivwshane
Other than wachovia, thanks for proving my point.
|
|
Originally Posted by cingtony
Maybe they charge the upgrade fee simply because they can. Its a 36.00 reconnect fee because laws prevent large late fees. The customer rules lets customer service waive it or credit it everytime if its an issue.
|
|
Originally Posted by holaDude
No it doesn't. The customer rules are there to allow associates to evaluate an issue and on a case by case basis if a manager agrees, then they may make an adjustment to the account. I do not wave the fee and will direct the customer back to store if they claim a store stated that it will be waived. I really hate saying this, but it is a standard fee that is really to be waived. If there are special promotions, then the system will waive the fee automatically.
|
|
Originally Posted by KidLatin
Southwest,
I am an ex VZW employee and they charge a $15.00 upgr fee. I know this is a late response but..... |
|
Originally Posted by suicidal2af
No...
The Midwest area USED to charge a $15 upgrade fee. That's been done away with for quite a while now. There seems to be a lot of confusion on how upgrades with VZW work. The only upgrade scenario where an upgrade fee is assessed is for an early upgrade(basically our version of an exception upgrade). In this case, yes, there is a $20 upgrade fee -- however, the customer is also getting the 2yr price on a phone, not the 1yr price. In the event of a lost/stolen/damaged phone with no insurance, we can offer the 1 year price on a phone with a 1 year contract. No upgrade fee. If customer has more than a year remaining on their contract, nothing renews. Secondary lines and lines below 34.99, after 20 months, get the 2yr sale price on new phones. No upgrade fees. Primary FSP lines and single lines from 34.99-79.98 get the 2yr sale price, minus a $50 credit towards it after 20 months. No upgrade fees. Primary FSP lines and single lines from 79.99+ get the 2yr sale price, minues a $100 credit after 20 months. No upgrade fees. We do charge $10 for a phonebook transfer via cellebrite. However, we do also have the UME-36's now, so the customer also gets their pictures/videos/sounds transferred. Also, if enrolled in My Account, the customer gets backup assistant at no charge -- backs numbers up on the network, and redownloads onto new phone. Again, no charge or fees applicable. Oh, and customers on plans 79.99 and above, after a few months on that plan, get enrolled in the merits/vip program. With that, the upgrade fee is waived on early upgrades, and the customer gets a $50 credit towards the 2yr price on an early upgrade. They also get free transfers via cellebrite, waived activation fees, 25/30% off of accessories, etc etc. So, yeah, the upgrade fee is dumb. |
|
Originally Posted by irockash
Maybe they just did away with upgrade advantage for indirect; pulled up an account yesterday that had been out of contract since 05 and no waived fee. I guess I could file this under the "AT&T's Genocide on Indirect" category...
Funny though, I haven't had anyone complain about the fee in a while, at least a year. I tell them about it before hand, and they just nod their heads. I think they know in the back of their minds they're getting screwed by the system, but its thought of like an atm fee or a convenience charge. |
|
Originally Posted by classylady78
There are still some waived fees....the only old contracts I have seen waived upg fees for are TDMA phones..
I work for COR and I have seen customers out of contract since 2005 who had an upg fee. The waived upgrade fees I have seen are usually the main line on a family plan, or someone who has a really high revenue with a huge rate plan. So it isn't just indirect....I think it just depends on the account. |
|
Originally Posted by AppleMac
According to the current m&p share lines and primary lines less than $39.99 do pay the $20 upgrade fee. This was the Midwest area m&p.
|
|
Originally Posted by OutPhase
|

|
Originally Posted by cingman66
Well, I don't have a fancy chart or anything...but I can tell you from alot of first hand experience what the NE market does:
As of September (roughly)- Regardless of total MRC, everyone is eligible to a standard 2-year upgrade after 17 months (assuming no other obstacles, like too many suspends, or a past due). AT&T will waive the upgrade fee if the total MRC is over @$75, and for all TDMA and old 'blue' customers. I have seen some standard 2-year upgrades allowed after only 12 months if the MRC is over $99, with waived fees of course. We also are allowed to do Exception Upgrades after 6 months of service...but are only paid commission if the MRC is over $59.99, and the fee is never waived. |
|
Originally Posted by classylady78
That is about the same here in the Southeast.
|
|
Originally Posted by ivwshane
Same here in the west, its part of at&t's upgrade advantage program.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser