|
Originally Posted by sanos
Thanks Drakkhen for all the guides, im telling you, if people were like you were around when i first started out at this forum i would have had a lot easier time figuring stuff out....
Your time and efforts are much appreciated. |
|
Originally Posted by ramb0
There's quite a lot of discussion around the net regarding BL 3.9 vs 4.6.
Another reason why some people want to stay on BL4.6 is due to the possibilities of CUSTOM Bootloaders. As mentioned, we can modify the Bootloader if it's version 4.6 (for example, downgrade to 3.9). This means if a custom BL is developed, only people that are currently on 4.6 would be able to load the custom BL. How ever, it may also be possible for someone to develop a hack that allows upgrading/modifying of the 3.9BL as well, although this is unknown. Custom Bootloader? Well, a Custom Bootloader could potentially mean that all future versions of the iPhone will be easily hacked, as the Bootloader is the main key of the iPhone. Keep in mind though, the time will come where Apple released a new iPhone, which will no doubt have different hardware properties, and include everything Apple has learnt so far from the hacking scene. |
|
Originally Posted by Drakkhen
This was in response to a post that was deleted by the OP on this thread. The post asked:
Right now, there is no easy guide or method that you'll be able to find that will help youu upgrade to back to 4.6. This is not a fault of the ZiPhone method of downgrading. The simple fact is, no matter if you'be downgraded to 3.9 from 4.6, or if you started at 3.9 O.O.B, there's is no BL upgrade. I think part of the reason one hasn't really been developed is, that there is zero demand. 3.9 is the bootloader of choice as it is still less restrictive. People who start off with a 3.9BL have obviously no reason to upgrade, and people who have 4.6BL phones either want to stay put or downgrade. So, unless there is actualy incentive to go to 4.6 I don't see one actually being developed. I'm sure that upgrading from 3.9 to 4.6 is possible; just as it was possible to downgrade, but why? If we answer 'why', then we'll get an end user solution to do so. L. |
|
Originally Posted by Drakkhen
Your computer and its HAL actually detects a DFU enabled phone as an entirely different device (and uses a different driver) compared to a phone that is in normal restore mode. This alone should tell you that there is something intrinsicly different about the two modes. When doing a restore, the method in which your computer uses to communicate to the phone differs vastly between the two.
|
|
Originally Posted by XFF
Can you elaborate on that a little bit? I'd like to better understand what the difference is between DFU Mode and Restore Mode. I suspect that in DFU mode, all the user information on the device is disregarded and the DFU driver only interfaces with the bootloader. Is that correct? But does the DFU Mode restore end up the same as a Restore Mode restore and only the way it gets there is different, or are there differences in how the phone is provisioned with either method? Why do the two modes exist in the first place? Was DFU mode only designed as a last resort when all else fails? If so, what's the tradeoff?
|
|
Originally Posted by swankmetal
is all the info in this thread still accurate? just wondering because i just got one of the refurbs and it came with 1.1.2, week 40. from what i've read, this is a good thing. not quite sure what route i should use for unlocking, etc. though.
|
|
Originally Posted by XFF
Can you elaborate on that a little bit? I'd like to better understand what the difference is between DFU Mode and Restore Mode. I suspect that in DFU mode, all the user information on the device is disregarded and the DFU driver only interfaces with the bootloader. Is that correct? But does the DFU Mode restore end up the same as a Restore Mode restore and only the way it gets there is different, or are there differences in how the phone is provisioned with either method? Why do the two modes exist in the first place? Was DFU mode only designed as a last resort when all else fails? If so, what's the tradeoff?
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser