|
Originally Posted by Chip90
How about not missing calls? On EDGE, if you are using data heavy apps- such as Youtube- all calls will go STRAIGHT to voicemail. With 3G, it is possible to receive calls during heavy data usage.
|
|
Originally Posted by steve45058
i average 175 kbps on edge..... 3G speeds seem very unnecessary... How much faster can it actually be?
|
|
Originally Posted by steve45058
I only see 1 pro for having 3G. Faster speed.... but i dont understand it... i average 175 kbps on edge..... 3G speeds seem very unnecessary... How much faster can it actually be?
Cons (some of these might be wrong) Wastes Battery Additional Charges to use Not that great of coverage iPhone will probably cost more So whats the big deal? Why do you guys want it so bad? Enlighten me |
|
Originally Posted by vandy1997
Why get a digital TV when you can have analog? The answer is because it is better technology, and it will help newer technology to be developed. Otherwise, we would still be using rotary dial phones!! Whay do we NEED a touch button phone? All kidding aside, you CAN do the following:
1) Upload/download at speeds that are up to 10x faster (did you ever use a dial-up modem and broadband for uploading/downloading and for browsing the internet? come on, now!); that means you can stream TV, download videos faster (video rentals on the road); download music faster; download applications faster; can make video calls; 2) Can use data and make/receive calls at the same time; this is not only useful for those who are using the internet and on the phone call at the same time; it can also be useful for somebody who is using an internet-based GPS application and receives a phone call; with EDGE, one must be turned off for the other to function; with 3G, the GPS will continue to function while you receive the phone call; 3) Better quality voice - as discussed before (WCDMA); 4) 3G will be available practically everywhere sooner or later - possibly by the end of the year; as Apple required AT&T to increase the speed and quality of EDGE, it may require the same of AT&T with respect to 3G - or at least to require AT&T to make it available nationwide; 5) I believe that 3G is more global - probably easier to access in oter countries; 6) Myth that rates will increase - likely not or people would decide only to get the EDGE package; with time, EDGE will die (as happened with analog), and so rates will not increase; 7) iPhone may cost more initially for early adopters, but as with other technogoly, the price will be the same as the original iPhone when it was launched; for those who cannot afford it initially, get the original iPhone at a discount and wait one year to purchase iPhone 2; 8) Wastes battery - probably the best point - but new chips are more efficient; and Apple has great pull in squeezing manufacturers to make better and more efficient products, as it did with Intel so that it could make the Air; also, if this product ever makes it to market http://mophie.com/products/juice-pack/?pod=iPhone , battery life is no longer a big deal, and it doubles as a case/phone protector, you can buy two and always have once charged, and it bypasses the problem of not being able to switch th internal battery; I think that I am done. Wile 3G is not a necessity for all by any means, it is more important than you think in making it more of a standard. The US lags much of the world in mobile communications networks - it is rather embarrassing. One more thought - maybe Apple will be embarrassed not to include full Bluetooth capability, a native search feature, native cut and paste, voice dialing, etc. (pretty basic features on high-end smartphones) on a state-of-the-art mobile communicator!! (crossing fingers) Any other questions? |
|
Originally Posted by ski1ski1
Your raw download speeds might be 175 kps, but that does not include latency. EDGE has very poor latency compared to 3G. When latency is factored in, you have a real world internet experience similar to a dial-up connection. That is why most web pages on the iPhone take between 30 to 60+ seconds to load on EDGE. Wouldn't you want a internet experience closer to the wi-fi experience you can obtain on the iPhone ?
|
|
Originally Posted by steve45058
Ive tried using 3G on a blackjack. The websites seemed to load maybe a second faster if that.
|
|
Originally Posted by steve45058
I like your points. Thanks for clarifying things... I do have a question about your first point though.... Everyone seems to say OMG STREAM TV MUSIC BLAH BLAH.... First off if you wanted to stream from a website such as surfthechannel or something... you need flash. Apple doesnt provide flash. So even Pandora.com u cant even use. ATT doesnt provide services either like Verizon does (I might be wrong again) to stream TV or music. Video calls are cool.... but how many people have the camera on a phone facing the person???? Believe me I LOVE TECHNOLOGY. But I dont see buying technology, that phones cant even handle yet. You can't do much more else than look up websites.... On the iphone really. Ive tried using 3G on a blackjack. The websites seemed to load maybe a second faster if that.
So in conclusion.... If the iPhone can do ALL of the things I asked above..... then by all means 3G is SICK but iPhone cant do that stuff yet |
|
Originally Posted by JonnyBruha
I'm never surprised that iPhone users aren't excited about 3G since a lot of its benefits wouldn't be very useful on the iPhone in its current state. The only real benefits would be downloading web pages faster, which would only be marginally faster due to the way Safari loads web pages and simultaneous voice and data. For only those two advantages, I'd rather have the better battery life on EDGE only.
Video calling is a great feature that 3G can take advantage of, but since the iPhone only has the 2mp camera on the back, it's not useful. Video sharing would be great to use, but the iPhone doesn't currently support video recording, much less streaming it elsewhere, so again, it's not useful. The iPhone does not have the ability to download files from websites natively, which is where the speed difference is much more noticeable. Useless again. In line with downloading files, the iPhone does not have a torrent or P2P application, so using the speed to pirate music faster doesn't apply either. |
|
Originally Posted by yourtoys7
I'm wondering if it'll be smaller/ thiner, that would be enuph reasons to upgrade. If it stays same as current size, then no really need to upgrade.
|
|
Originally Posted by rmastbro
Don't get me wrong having 3G on an iPhone would be sweet but at what price ???
Right now we are paying $20 for unlimited web and email ... However, when the 3G iPhone comes out I will bet that the unlimited web will double ($40) just like it did for all smartphones when AT&T raised the prices late last year. Yes, 3G is cool for the iPhone but would you pay $40/month to have this feature ??? Just my 2 cents |
|
Originally Posted by rmastbro
Don't get me wrong having 3G on an iPhone would be sweet but at what price ???
Right now we are paying $20 for unlimited web and email ... However, when the 3G iPhone comes out I will bet that the unlimited web will double ($40) just like it did for all smartphones when AT&T raised the prices late last year. Yes, 3G is cool for the iPhone but would you pay $40/month to have this feature ??? Just my 2 cents |
|
Originally Posted by LIVEFRMNYC
Put it like this .....
I never use WiFi on my TyTN II and don't miss the lack of WiFi at all on my Treo 750. That's how good 3G is. |
|
Originally Posted by rablat
Everybody always seems to forget that call quality is also affected by 3G
No more half rate on 3G always Full rate. WCDMA which is the voice side of 3G is much greater sound quality both ends of the conversation. |
|
Originally Posted by XFF
Well smaller would not be good, as that would mean a smaller screen, which (the current big screen) is one of the main selling points of the device, so that wouldn't make much sense.
|
|
Originally Posted by Derek Zoolander
There is a lot of unused acreage. An inch on both the top and bottom. It can certainly be made smaller.
|
|
Originally Posted by Petey07
I hope they make it smaller, cus nowaday some people rarely hold their phone for a long time because of bluetooth technology as well as headphone.
|
|
Originally Posted by Petey07
I hope they make it smaller, cus nowaday some people rarely hold their phone for a long time because of bluetooth technology as well as headphone.
|
|
Originally Posted by XFF
First of all, that's more like half an inch each, and second, that space is needed for the earpiece and the home button. Ok, the home button could possibly be moved to the side, like the power button, but the earpiece is most certainly needed where it's at. ....At some point, smaller is no longer better.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser