i know its $50 cheaper
its smaller (but that doesnt matter to me really)
and its like the same as the voyager except that it doesnt have youtube (yet at least) and no mediaflo tv
right now im leaning towards the voyager
but i originally liked the glyde
Posted by: dimsum05
If you want the flagship, get the Voyager. Otherwise, if you are strapped for cash, get the Glyde.
Posted by: Tbeas12
The Glyde's touchscreen is much nicer
Posted by: ssoccerh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbeas12
The Glyde's touchscreen is much nicer
it is?
more responsive i guess?
Posted by: vtwin_gary
i'll be getting one of the 2 of these phones sometime very soon & i'm torn as well. i like the size & new touch of the glyde vs. the hack ability of the LG
i have the weekend to think about it so if anyone can give any real pros or cons for either i'd love to hear em.
Posted by: soundofclocks
I previously had the Voyager and its touch screen was screwier than the Glyde's. Also, most of the apps were only usable if you opened the phone. It was kind of annoying really b/c it wasn't easy to use with one hand. I think the Glyde looks better over all and the UI of the Glyde is slighter different (better IMO). Plus, the Glyde has a flash on its camera. It typically not that useful since its on a cell phone, but at least its there and can be used as a mediocre flashlight. Despite the Glyde not having Youtube, I think its browser is slightly better overall.
