Google
 
Web www.howardforums.com
Pages: 1

Best Sounding MP3 Player.......?

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Grave

I would of posted this in the Audio section but its kinda Dead There:

So...

Which mp3 player has the best sound quality PERIOD.....I Already have High Quality Headphones so thats not a problem

money is really not an option...but it must have Very Good Battery life too



Posted by: davisboy

i hear sony's mp3 players have excellent audio quality. they also have a line of players with 40hours of playback.



Posted by: eggsuperperson

Cowon has great sound quality



Posted by: OpenWave

I would still have to say the iPod and I would say more importantly the quality of the mp3's are IMO more of an important factor. Most mp3's are 128kbps and ideally to have CD quality you would need between 192 and 320kbps, however most of use are not able to differentiate between the two. So yes the iPod 30,60,80,160GB are great choices. Battery life is usually at a day and a half.



Posted by: huskyfan23

Cowon gets my vote. The I7 and D2 have great SQ. Sony's new ones are supposed to be great too.

iPod? Such a joke. Decent SQ, but a terrible equalizer. There is much better out there.



Posted by: OpenWave

Quote:
Originally Posted by huskyfan23
Cowon gets my vote. The I7 and D2 have great SQ. Sony's new ones are supposed to be great too.

iPod? Such a joke. Decent SQ, but a terrible equalizer. There is much better out there.
True but usually mp3's are recorded as the artist intended it to sound and isn't there a way to tweak the sound using iTunes?
I haven't really shopped around for one, are there any decent mp3 players with a 30G+ storage?



Posted by: roycereece

Zune with 320kbps mp3's. I personally use the acoustic equalizer with the Zune premium earphones (in-ear, they work great!)



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenWave
I would still have to say the iPod and I would say more importantly the quality of the mp3's are IMO more of an important factor. Most mp3's are 128kbps and ideally to have CD quality you would need between 192 and 320kbps, however most of use are not able to differentiate between the two. So yes the iPod 30,60,80,160GB are great choices. Battery life is usually at a day and a half.


the way of encoding is more important than bitrate
VBR provides "headroom" to more complicated portion
192kbps VBR even exceeds 256kbps or higher CBR

if your hardware supports ogg vorbis and/or FLAC, use it
ogg vorbis has better, acoustic-friendly coding scheme, while FLAC is lossless codec



Posted by: eggsuperperson

Cowon play's FLAC's, or you can use 320kbps MP3s.
If you go iPod, Apple Lossless is great also, you're better off buying lossless/320kbps tracks from places other than iTunes. Apple uses a 128kbps bitrate which is just bad.



Posted by: holaDude

The headphones are just as important as the player is. You can have the best player in the world, but substandard headphones will kill the sound quality.



Posted by: YudistPriest

So yeah, if I had to rate the different sound factors in order of importance, I would say (from most to least important):
1. Bitrate - 192/320 kbps is ALWAYS going to sound better than 128, even on a crappy player.
2. Headphones - A nice set of phones with great dynamic range that can acurately reproduce the music makes a HUGE difference.
3. Encoding Method - Like the post above says, VBR keeps size manageable, while containing all the necessary information to reproduce the sound.
4. MP3 player - Sure, some support different/more filetypes than others, but most common players support a lossless codec, making that pretty negligible.

Good luck, and it looks like the community consensus is Cowon.



Posted by: pager

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenWave
Most mp3's are 128kbps and ideally to have CD quality you would need between 192 and 320kbps, however most of use are not able to differentiate between the two.



I can DEFINITELY differentiate between 128k and 192k, so I try to have all my MP3s 192k or higher. After 192 I can't tell a difference though, lol.



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Wirelessly posted (HP 211 and SE Z780: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7))

Quote:
Originally Posted by pager
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenWave
Most mp3's are 128kbps and ideally to have CD quality you would need between 192 and 320kbps, however most of use are not able to differentiate between the two.



I can DEFINITELY differentiate between 128k and 192k, so I try to have all my MP3s 192k or higher. After 192 I can't tell a difference though, lol.


128kbps mp3 is badly distorted (both CBR and VBR), 192kbps or higher VBR is definitely better, and the best balance between quality and size
and memory card is very cheap per GB...



Posted by: OpenWave

I must be going deaf, you have to have a fine ear to differentiate between 128 and 192kbps. And true, encoding is just as important. I'm using the standard LAME encoder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by holaDude
The headphones are just as important as the player is. You can have the best player in the world, but substandard headphones will kill the sound quality.
For headphones Ultimate Ears are top notch, kinda on the pricey side though.
Can someone tell me if they have ever seen this product MyVu for mp3 players, looks high-tech.





Posted by: eggsuperperson

I'm able to tell the difference between a 192 and a 320, rarely a 256 and 320 using my iPhone and Ultimate Ears Super.Fi 5EB's.

The 256/320 difference is really rare, but once in a while I can tell side by side.

Anyone else?



Posted by: ultran00b

Sony/Cowon Mp3 player with decent headphones is your best bet.



Posted by: nanosp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Skyeandce
the way of encoding is more important than bitrate
VBR provides "headroom" to more complicated portion
192kbps VBR even exceeds 256kbps or higher CBR

if your hardware supports ogg vorbis and/or FLAC, use it
ogg vorbis has better, acoustic-friendly coding scheme, while FLAC is lossless codec


Exactly. Sansa's mp3 players (Clip, Fuze, e280) support both ogg and FLAC..
using ogg @ 128kbps is equivalent to mp3 @ at least 160-192 VBR



Posted by: nanosp

Quote:
Originally Posted by eggsuperperson
I'm able to tell the difference between a 192 and a 320, rarely a 256 and 320 using my iPhone and Ultimate Ears Super.Fi 5EB's.

The 256/320 difference is really rare, but once in a while I can tell side by side.

Anyone else?


Sometimes, and only with certain tracks can you tell the difference, but the encoder matters a lot, in my opinion LAME is the best..

but doing an ABX test may be the only way to discern any differences...



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Quote:
Originally Posted by nanosp
Exactly. Sansa's mp3 players (Clip, Fuze, e280) support both ogg and FLAC..
using ogg @ 128kbps is equivalent to mp3 @ at least 160-192 VBR


Sandisk Sansa?!
I don't think the brand supports ogg vorbis
only Korean brand supports



Posted by: nanosp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Skyeandce
Sandisk Sansa?!
I don't think the brand supports ogg vorbis
only Korean brand supports


Both the clip and fuze support ogg now, the fuze also does flac via firmware updates.. http://www.dapreview.net/news.php?item.4340.2
I think I was wrong on the E series though.



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Quote:
Originally Posted by nanosp
Both the clip and fuze support ogg now, the fuze also does flac via firmware updates.. http://www.dapreview.net/news.php?item.4340.2
I think I was wrong on the E series though.


http://www.sansa.com/players/sansa_fuze/tech

got it
just wish it has 16GB version though, because iriver E100 8GB is $100 now
both have microSDHC slot



Posted by: nanosp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Skyeandce
http://www.sansa.com/players/sansa_fuze/tech

got it
just wish it has 16GB version though, because iriver E100 8GB is $100 now
both have microSDHC slot


16Gb would be perfect, as my my collection of tracks I normally play is now exceeding 6GB, my clip only has 2GB

Is the iriver good? a friend said I'd be better off with one of the new nano's or an ipod classic?



Posted by: MountainBikerMark

Wirelessly posted (Are you GREEN with ENV at my: LGE-VX9900/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2 (GUI) MMP/2.0)

anythingbutipod.com does some unbiased reviews using different formats for real world applications of the players. They never use stock earphones either since most stock ones will only degrade opinions



Posted by: chimphappyhour

I picked up a fuze, an excellent little player. I have the 8GB and have yet to use the expansion slot, but memory is falling like a rock so I might just pick up an extra 8GB for the future. The last fw update did wonders for the player and it sounds like they're still actively working on future upgrades.

My last mp3 player was an iRiver which was really good. Sad to hear that they may not be as good as they used to be.

I'll also second anythingbutipod.com for reviews and information.



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Quote:
Originally Posted by chimphappyhour
I picked up a fuze, an excellent little player. I have the 8GB and have yet to use the expansion slot, but memory is falling like a rock so I might just pick up an extra 8GB for the future. The last fw update did wonders for the player and it sounds like they're still actively working on future upgrades.

My last mp3 player was an iRiver which was really good. Sad to hear that they may not be as good as they used to be.

I'll also second anythingbutipod.com for reviews and information.


I don't know should I get another mp3 player (or should I call ogg player as 80% of audio files are .ogg), because I already have 64GB storage on my HP211 (and it supports wireless headphones)
off topic: I have successfully hacked TM506, and have peace of mind, because OTA fw check is OFF by default, that as long as you don't update with SEUS, you can keep R3CA forever



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

I have a question to ask Sansa Fuze users
can it sort .ogg files by tag
I have samsung player, and it can't, it can't open folders (I sort albums this way)
now Sansa Fuze 8GB is $90 at CC



Posted by: chimphappyhour

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Skyeandce
I have a question to ask Sansa Fuze users
can it sort .ogg files by tag
I have samsung player, and it can't, it can't open folders (I sort albums this way)
now Sansa Fuze 8GB is $90 at CC


The Sansa's don't use folders either. It just loads the music in and sorts via the usual tags such as artist, name, album, type and ratings.



Posted by: Scottish Skyedance

Wirelessly posted (HP 211 and SE Z780: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7))

Quote:
Originally Posted by chimphappyhour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Skyeandce
I have a question to ask Sansa Fuze users
can it sort .ogg files by tag
I have samsung player, and it can't, it can't open folders (I sort albums this way)
now Sansa Fuze 8GB is $90 at CC


The Sansa's don't use folders either. It just loads the music in and sorts via the usual tags such as artist, name, album, type and ratings.


the can it sort ogg, as I asked previously?
I don't want to make up playlist for albums while it's supposed to be properly sorted



Posted by: sabesh

Quote:
Originally Posted by davisboy
i hear sony's mp3 players have excellent audio quality. they also have a line of players with 40hours of playback.

^^ I concur. I tested a whole lot of them earlier this year and the Sony's sounded the best.



Posted by: vitin

Quote:
Originally Posted by davisboy
i hear sony's mp3 players have excellent audio quality. they also have a line of players with 40hours of playback.

and bulletprouff bulid hands up for sony



Posted by: dgb52

The Sansa clip and fuze, Cowon D2 and the Sony's players are said to have some of the best sound quality around

as was mentioned above go to www.anythingbutipod.com for reviews on a lot of mp3 players



Posted by: mick4394

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgb52
The Sansa clip and fuze, Cowon D2 and the Sony's players are said to have some of the best sound quality around

as was mentioned above go to www.anythingbutipod.com for reviews on a lot of mp3 players


I just picked up a Clip, and it's easily the best sounding MP3 player I've ever owned.

I'm about as far from an audiophile as you'll find, but I'm completely blown away by the sound that this thing produces. It completely destroys my Zune 30 and my Zen, which are hardly slouches.

It's amazing to me that such an inexpensive device can out perform more expensive players by such a wide margin. If you want a high quality sound, go get a Clip. You won't be disappointed.



Posted by: cidknee

i got my brother in law a sansa...it was on sale... I put some music on it, and OMG.. it DOES rock. MUCH better than my wifes ipoop. And yes I used the same headphones



Posted by: newtype2011

- Sansa Clip

- Sony A/S series





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2009 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser