|
Originally posted by xerxes Is anyone using their S55 as a GPRS connection to enable internet surfing/email from a Windows PC over Bluetooth? I have recently bought a Belkin Bluetooth adapter for my notebook in the hope that I could pick up email etc whilst out of the office. When configuring the set up I have been able to pair the adapter with my S55 but I the adapter then reports that the S55 has no LAN profile for it to attach to. Can anyone advise me? |
|
Originally posted by xerxes Thanks, I'll give that a try. As a matter of interest, where did you find the "*99#" number to dial? |
|
Originally posted by Ack! Can anyone comment on data throughput performance of GPRS vs. tradtional dialup (DUN) when using the S56 as a modem? I've tried the phone both ways - one way using the Siemens GPRS Modem Assistant software, and the other way, configuring my ATT dialer software to use the Bluetooth DUN connection, and they seem to be roughly the same, in terms of throughput. |
|
In areas of fairly poor signal reception, I have gotten sustained 4.5-5.1 kilobyte/sec download speeds on compressed files using s56 over bluetooth. |
| The battery life is so sucky however, that I am forced to use a nokia 6310i for bluetooth/webbing. Also the S56 speaker volume is insanely low and it is almost unusable as a phone. |
|
Originally posted by Ack! So, you're saying that Bluetooth is the bottleneck, and that the actual data transmission over the airwaves is greater than the BT protocol can pass? That's confusing, because I thought that BT was capable of a theoretical 720K, which suggests that you misunderstood my question. I'm asking about which method of connecting to an ISP is faster - dialup via DUN, or GPRS. To simplify the question, take BT out of it, and assume a serial cable connection as the basis for the example. Agree with qualifications on the battery life, but disagree with the speaker volume point. I find the S56 to have great sound, and ample volume. It does fall down a bit, however, when being used as a speakerphone. |
|
Originally posted by Ack! Ah! Gotcha. So, I'm right... there really wasn't a fundamental difference. It seems that the maximum throughput of GPRS is roughly the same as a 56k landline dialup. Interesting. Looks like I can't see a reason to bother paying Cingular additional money for that!!! |

|
Originally posted by Ack! Vgill, I think you're missing my point. I'm using an S56 via BT to dial up to the ATT.net account I've had for 5+ years, which gives me the equal performance of using GPRS that I have to pay extra for. So, in my case, I can drop the GPRS service, save myself the money, get extended battery life, and not look back, since I'm not losing anything in the way of performance or functionality. |
| It will eat up your minutes though, vs. the flat-rate gprs which means I can surf and check email without having to worry about keeping an eye on my usage. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser