Google
 
Web www.howardforums.com
Pages: 1

Post Pictures from your 902/SX813 Here

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Celeron655

Hey im looking at getting this phone , but i can't find many pictures from it.

Looking for pictures at full res (with and without autofous)
Please just post as many pictures as you can, show the good and bad of the camera.


Thanks



Posted by: uber0

Can't find any pictures from it? You're kidding me. Search the Forum.



Posted by: Celeron655

They are mostly random pictures, do not say if zoom was used or if autofous was on.

Then i find some random good ones , then really bad ones... :S im confsued if its a good camera phone or bad. I was hoping someone with the phone could post same pics with different settings.

I currently have a Nokia 6630, and i want a better camera phone.

N840 is looking good.



Posted by: ajamils

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeron655
They are mostly random pictures, do not say if zoom was used or if autofous was on.

Then i find some random good ones , then really bad ones... :S im confsued if its a good camera phone or bad. I was hoping someone with the phone could post same pics with different settings.

I currently have a Nokia 6630, and i want a better camera phone.

N840 is looking good.


Its a good camera phone but definitely not the best one. As far as the pictures are concernted N840 or xcute dv1 are better than 902.



Posted by: spy cl

yeah, i am kind disappointed about the 902/sx813 after reading its full review...

N840 is the best 2 mp camera phone out there today(no qestion better than s700,gx32,6630, but i was surprise that n840 is even better than 902, I used for like 2 weeks, i have the amazing time with th n840. The photo's color and tone and clarity are amazing! The N840 read and record the photos so fast, unlike 902, it takes more than 5 second to save a photo, n840 takes about 2.5 seconds. the only thing i don't like about the phone is you cannot zoom in the photo.

in term of 902, for the high price, you get not better photo quality than n840, i will not buy one for sure, It's simply not worth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajamils
Its a good camera phone but definitely not the best one. As far as the pictures are concernted N840 or xcute dv1 are better than 902.




Posted by: danthach

Click my link - the new pics are from the 902, the older ones are from my tm200



Posted by: kimchi29

Quote:
Originally Posted by danthach
Click my link - the new pics are from the 902, the older ones are from my tm200


it seems some pics are less blurry than others, im guesing you dont have a really steady hand? or is it a pick of the draw, some will be clear some wont? i have a really really steady hand, so think the pics will come out clearer?



Posted by: Celeron655

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimchi29
it seems some pics are less blurry than others, im guesing you dont have a really steady hand? or is it a pick of the draw, some will be clear some wont? i have a really really steady hand, so think the pics will come out clearer?



Yes i would like to see someone who has maybe put the phone on a table or tripod to take pictures, and try with auto focus on and off.



Posted by: action-packed

Quote:
Originally Posted by spy cl
yeah, i am kind disappointed about the 902/sx813 after reading its full review...

N840 is the best 2 mp camera phone out there today(no qestion better than s700,gx32,6630, but i was surprise that n840 is even better than 902, I used for like 2 weeks, i have the amazing time with th n840. The photo's color and tone and clarity are amazing! The N840 read and record the photos so fast, unlike 902, it takes more than 5 second to save a photo, n840 takes about 2.5 seconds. the only thing i don't like about the phone is you cannot zoom in the photo.

in term of 902, for the high price, you get not better photo quality than n840, i will not buy one for sure, It's simply not worth.


so which cam is actually better? the tm200 or the 902?

and also, how can the n840 take better pics than the tm200/902 when the tm200/902 has a CCD camera and the n840 has a CMOS camera?



Posted by: braindead5400

if anyone wants to see pics from the 902, go to my xanga (listed in my sig) and scroll down to the entry with all the pics from my "vacation". Once it leaves the main page of my xanga (in a few days) I'll delete the pics



Posted by: ajamils

Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead5400
if anyone wants to see pics from the 902, go to my xanga (listed in my sig) and scroll down to the entry with all the pics from my "vacation". Once it leaves the main page of my xanga (in a few days) I'll delete the pics


Really nice pics...probably one of the best ones that I've seen from 902 so far.



Posted by: D_RiDE

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajamils
Really nice pics...probably one of the best ones that I've seen from 902 so far.


I 2nd to that....
I'm looking to buy one as well, but after seeing those picture, i find that the quality isn't a whole lot better than my GX22.

I believe the size of those pictures were taken 860*640, and i have to say mine would come out fairly similar to those ones in terms of quality. (unless you have shaky hands or the setting wasn't at the optimal.)



Posted by: danthach

Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead5400
if anyone wants to see pics from the 902, go to my xanga (listed in my sig) and scroll down to the entry with all the pics from my "vacation". Once it leaves the main page of my xanga (in a few days) I'll delete the pics


dude what are the settings for your camera? My pics suck compared to urs.



Posted by: braindead5400

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuGeNPoWeR
I 2nd to that....
I'm looking to buy one as well, but after seeing those picture, i find that the quality isn't a whole lot better than my GX22.

I believe the size of those pictures were taken 860*640, and i have to say mine would come out fairly similar to those ones in terms of quality. (unless you have shaky hands or the setting wasn't at the optimal.)

The extra pixels (they were taken on 2mp mode) really help when you are printing pics out. I printed most of the pics out and they look really nice (for a phone). Even if your 22 looks like that, they won't print out that way.

All I did was point and shoot and use night mode for a few of the dimmer areas (the dark ones I took up in the ceiling I used night mode and the assist light)



Posted by: MODist

Nice pics!
Take a look at N840's pictures on it's website



Posted by: kaizoku_san

Nice pics braindead5400!!

I find it hilarious that your grandma keeps nunchuks in her glove compartment! I was trying to picture that in my head.. her using them..



Posted by: af2w131f

Quote:
Nice pics!Take a look at N840's pictures on it's website


Hands down NEC n840 is the best phone for taking pictures, 902 takes great pictures but has this haze(blurry) around the pictures sometimes, while the n840 takes 'pure detail' pictures. I wish there was a professional reviewer to compare the n840 vs the 902's cameras. But from all the pictures of the n840 and 902 i've seen the n840 just takes a cleaner/better picture.



Posted by: braindead5400

the nec has sharper pictures but there is a larger amount of noise in solid colored objects. Luckily, its not really noticeable unless you are really studying the pics. The 902 imo performs better in low light conditions than the nec thanks to its ccd sensor (cmos censors arent as sensitive to light and don't perform as well in the dark).

Oh, and the nec is not the best for pics, the xcute is. 3mp and surprisingly good night pics for a cmos



Posted by: Celeron655

What i would like to see is the

K750i VS N840 VS Sharp 902 in camera

The sharp has auto focus and so does the K750i? but not the N840?

the blur is becuase of the 2x ZOom on the sharp.



Posted by: braindead5400

the zoom is not the reason for the blur. The sharp 902 however has a wider angle of view than other phones and you can crop the outer most parts of the image to cut out the blurred stuff



Posted by: spy cl

Quote:
Originally Posted by action-packed
so which cam is actually better? the tm200 or the 902?

and also, how can the n840 take better pics than the tm200/902 when the tm200/902 has a CCD camera and the n840 has a CMOS camera?


that's why i am so surprise to see that NEC n840 have taken better photo than sharp 902. the 902 has the big pixels when you see the photo on the computer, also the color for the 902 is much bluish. I also most say I have great time with NEC N840. N840's photo has better resolution and the color tone is correct compared to the real life object. tm200 and 902's camera are basically the same, but 902 has a 2x optical zoom, that is the difference.

if you want to see sharp t200(similiar to 902) VS NEC N840 VS another 3.0MP cell phone Xcute DV1 review, please read here, it's in chinese, but you can click every pages if you cannot read chinese.

http://www.sogi.com.tw/park/content.asp?a_id=582



Posted by: braindead5400

Quote:
Originally Posted by spy cl
the 902 has the big pixels when you see the photo on the computer,

What big pixels?



Posted by: AL9999

The Sharp GX-T300 (not T200, that's a typo) is a different branded version of the TM-200 for T-Mobile, and uses a completely different camera sensor than the one in the 902, so you can't use it as a basis of comparison for the 902. In other words, it isn't similar to the 902 in any way at all, apart from being CCD and having the same amount of megapixels.



Posted by: af2w131f

Umm for all you phone fanatics that don't know much about cameras the CMOS sensor is used in cameras costing over $3,000 so all this 'I can't believe its taking these great pictures cause its a CMOS" or "CMOS sucks compared to CCD" is just totally wrong.

Heres a link to the Canon EOS-1D camera at amazon.com that cost $3,900..and it's one of the best cameras made for the money. Canon EOS-1D at Amazon.com



Posted by: braindead5400

You can't compare high end digital cameras that use cmos to cell phones that use cmos, they are two completely different categories. CCD cameras generally do better in phones than cmos cameras, with very few exceptions (one of them being the nec). CCD cameras are larger modules that are more sensitive to light and therefor usually have pictures with less noise in them.



Posted by: totaltoanage

you sharp nuthuggers need to understand that the 902 isnt the best cameraphone compared to the competiters. Camera wise we are probably in the same category/or slightly under the S700i and that is only 1.3 MP. IMO 1. K750i 2. N840 3/4 S700i 902. But multimedia wise, the 902 is the best phone (so far) that offers music videos and pretty good camera shots. END OF STORY.



Posted by: af2w131f

Maybe I was born yesterday but cell phones with 'decent' cameras inside them didn't take place till maybe a year ago. So having a year for cell phone makers to find decent cameras in their phones isn't very long and hense theres no reason to make a final desision that 'CMOS=bad for cell phones'.

So my only point is don't judge a cell phones camera from a CCD/CMOS comparison. I'll happily trade someone a Sharp 902 for a Canon EOS-1D so they can get their 'awesome' CCD sensor. Get my point?



Posted by: braindead5400

Quote:
Originally Posted by totaltoanage
you sharp nuthuggers need to understand that the 902 isnt the best cameraphone compared to the competiters. Camera wise we are probably in the same category/or slightly under the S700i and that is only 1.3 MP. IMO 1. K750i 2. N840 3/4 S700i 902. But multimedia wise, the 902 is the best phone (so far) that offers music videos and pretty good camera shots. END OF STORY.
you need to rethink your little list there, you are missing some phones. I've owned several 1mp+ phones and the S700i deserves to be nowhere near 3rd. I've taken better shots with a GX32 than a S700i.



Posted by: braindead5400

Quote:
Originally Posted by af2w131f
Maybe I was born yesterday but cell phones with 'decent' cameras inside them didn't take place till maybe a year ago. So having a year for cell phone makers to find decent cameras in their phones isn't very long and hense theres no reason to make a final desision that 'CMOS=bad for cell phones'.

So my only point is don't judge a cell phones camera from a CCD/CMOS comparison. I'll happily trade someone a Sharp 902 for a Canon EOS-1D so they can get their 'awesome' CCD sensor. Get my point?

I understand what you mean and all, but the way things are right now, a CCD sensor generally means better pics for phones. That may change in the future, but thats the way it is now.



Posted by: spy cl

Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead5400
you need to rethink your little list there, you are missing some phones. I've owned several 1mp+ phones and the S700i deserves to be nowhere near 3rd. I've taken better shots with a GX32 than a S700i.


well, I've owned nec n840, gx32 and s700i before, gx32vsS700i--> it depends on the condition of the place you take shot, gx32 takes amazing shots, but s700i does sometimes take better pictures then gx32. it just depend on what kind shot you are taking plus the environment.

n840 vs gx32 vs s700i
not doubt that n840 takes the best shots, the only part that nec n840 lose gx32, is when you take photos in macro mode.



Posted by: braindead5400

and to pics in low light conditions





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser