I'm sure I think of more
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
I'm hoping to make this thread a sticky so we can discuss Exchange and connectivity with Windows Mobile. I know that a lot of people out there have questions about how to setup their exchange servers and how to route security and mails. Please post your questions here and I will be able to answer them. Don't forget, this includes outsourced Exchange servers as well. If you want to build your own cluster, I could help with that as well. I'm looking forward to hearing from all HoFo members that use Windows Mobile.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@tschabo
Good question. Here's a thought: How about running an instance of outlook on native PC and then an instance of Outlook through Terminal Server on the Windows 2003 Server? You can have both Outlooks open at the same time then. I still preefer 1and1 for personal outsourced exchange. ASP-One is fast and flexible but costs more. As for MI8, they are one of the top ones to deal with. If you can deal with running your own Exchange server, I would still suggest it for people that want the extra power. TSchabo regarding sent mails, (SYNCHRONIZE YOUR SENT FOLDER!!!!!) To do this, go to Activesync or Outlook E-mail account on the PPC and then hit Tools --> Manage Folders --> check whichever folders you want to sync. |
|
Originally Posted by Bran1722
@tschabo
How are you enjoying 1and1 service so far? Do you find it better than your trial with 4smartphone? Does 1and1 have autd feature? |
|
Originally Posted by Bran1722
Plz keep us posted... Now that you do have 1and1 working properly, does your info sync as fast as it did for 4smartphone?
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@TSchabo
You need to have IE6.x+ in with firewall exceptions for the site otherwise you will have no access to the right click function. The page is designed with VM in mind and require certain software components to work properly. I like OWA a lot since it reacts well. As for 1and1, I picked them over some other ones due to their flexibility. You could add multiple exchange accounts and handle multiple sites from a single console. The speeds on 1and1 are pretty nice and I can get pretty good speed for synchronization as well as RPC over HTTP. Nothing beats having your own cluster but hey, if you can't afford it or don't want to bother with it, outsource!!!! |
The problem is the archive won't be accessible on my laptop and my desktop though right?
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
I almost forgot, you should try this first. You can't use a NETBIOS or IP address when you enter in the server information in Activesync. This won't work. Your server should be externally resolved via DNS and you need to put in the full FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) which should look like this: netbiosname.domain.com. Try this first since that may be the main issue. The other issue I posted is only if this fails.
|
. From time to time it's a DNS issue.
. After this, I'm going to have a glass of scotch. My diagnosis is entry corruption on the DB. Here is my fix for it:
. |
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
you should make separate POP3 or IMAP accounts for your other e-mail accounts besides your primary so you can send out e-mails from 2 separate addresses. This however does mean that you won't have the e-mails sent from the POP3 or IMAP account in your Exchange Sent Items folder.
|
). The current DB is just not as useable as I had hoped so the move to SQL will be awesome for those of us using backends and custom frontends. The end is coming so hold onto your mobile device because it's a whole new ballgame with SQL now.
. OWA as most of you have noticed is NOT complete. A new version of Outlook/OWA would help a lot. Once the new Exchange is set in stone with an SQL backend, we can welcome better XML and PHP frontends to Outlook and OWA. Welcome to the new world order of telecommunications.|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Ah, the solution for that is simple, you have your mails forwarded to the exchange account. You then separate the mails to different folders. This way since Activesync always runs when it's supposed to, you can receive all of your mails. You only use the POP/IMAP accounts for sending out mail through your tertiary mail accounts.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Where have you been??? I posted on Windows Mobile 6.x aka Photon already a few months ago. There are going to be lots of enhancements going into the next OS. Regarding the article you referenced, I'll cover the points one by one to answer questions.
Preface. Yes, it's about the 12th iteration of the Windows Exchange Server already. The guys at Microsoft have finally heard my plea to switch their Exchange DBs over to SQL (Those butt-heads should have done so a long time ago if you ask me ). The current DB is just not as useable as I had hoped so the move to SQL will be awesome for those of us using backends and custom frontends. The end is coming so hold onto your mobile device because it's a whole new ballgame with SQL now.1. Universal Message Store - Yes, another thing that should have been realized a LONG time ago. If you aren't already faxing, receiving voicemail, and network messaging from your exchange account, the new iteration should include it. I'm already doing all 3 functions and looking to extend to more on my systems. 2. Core Technologies - IMF was such an antiquated POS that I trashed it and went with MailEssentials and better security software on my systems. Improved IMF will only be a slight improvement. What will really change things is virus and Bayesian filtering in SQL DBs which should change the industry drastically. On top of this, more advanced firewalls would help and offensive firewall structures should be built to prevent tampering with security. It's pretty much like arming yourself to the teeth on the internet but that's what should happen. Of course there are some of us individuals that will still be able to get into these systems but at least Joe Schmoe won't have "accidental" access to your core security. OWA....What can I say??? I LOVE it. I don't mean, give a good hug love it, I mean smack that booty and get down with it love. Wow, my use of colloqialisms will guarantee that none of my stuff gets published in news sites . OWA as most of you have noticed is NOT complete. A new version of Outlook/OWA would help a lot. Once the new Exchange is set in stone with an SQL backend, we can welcome better XML and PHP frontends to Outlook and OWA. Welcome to the new world order of telecommunications.3. E-mail and Mobile Devices - Not exactly smart to make it cross compatible with older and less sophisticated devices but it will add value to the product. I think that Microsoft should stop dicking around and just force everyone to use their software. Sure, they'll get into an antitrust lawsuit but it's worth it. Symbian and Palm OS are not good for Exchange and if the new Exchange systems are going to support what the general populace needs to function, you can kiss UIQ and Palm OS goodbye. Linux is still a viable alternative though which will be nice. 4. Role-based - Smart idea but someone better write a good manual on this otherwise I'm going to go over there and whoop someone up the hindside. To a network admin, this is a good thing if documentation is up to snuff. They seriously need to make Role-based UIs more user-friendly, otherwise they are going to need special training staff to teach this crap to ITs. Standardization is key to success in the future and if Microsoft doesn't realize it by now, a lot of money will be wasted on IT staff. 5. New Tools and Capabilities - YES!!!!!!! They heard me again. For those of you that use the Exchange Management Console, you know that it's just not powerful enough. The combination of AD and EMC made the entire system fill with BS terminology and inefficient code. SQL backend will change much of this. Scripting will be much better now. 6. Coordinated Development - This idea is one of the best things that the guys in Microsoft were ever told. They seriously need to work with all "compatible" devices and OSs to make everything function smoothly. Sure, it's not completely upgradeable but some of the core technologies haven't been available or developed yet. 7. Recommendations - Gee, I wonder why nobody wants to upgrade to the new systems immediately? Could it be a net investment of over $8k per unit? Yes, people should spend money on this but spending heaps of money for just the hardware to match with software? You've got to have a business that REALLY needs information badly. Cost reduction and broader acceptance of non-hosted exchange servers will be a good way to start making headway for MS Exchange to become THE player in telecommunications. |
In my day the internet was just 2 pieces of string attached to tin cans.
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Okie, I understand your question. I don't recommend using 3rd party software to synchronize via USB. The problem lies in the Hotsync software. If you do use this software, you will most likely have a much more complicated or flawed synchronization process. Activesync 3.7+ is normally fine for synchronization however so I haven't had any duplication problems except in extreme cases where someone decided it was a good idea to restore contact databases from a faulty db.
Regarding mail synchronization, you are required to sync your mail if you don't want to. I would recommend using Exchange based e-mail since it is much more reliable and rich compared to POP or IMAP. So overall, Exchange will offer you what you need if you are on multiple OSs. For your Treo however you WILL need Goodlink to get reliable access to an exchange server. I'm pretty much through with Treos since I've trashed over 100 already. They either end up crashing, breaking, not operating effectively, or other mishaps. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
I would try uninstalling some of the applications you have on the Axim and then installing them in the storage card if possible.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
If you change the e-mail synchronization to 1 week, you should make sure that you clear the storage card of old attachments.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
I would also recommend going into Tools --> Options --> Storage (tab) --> check Store attachments on storage card. This will store all of your attachments on the storage card.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
If you are still having problems, it means that you aren't out of space on the Axim, instead you need to follow my original directions to clear the Exchange database of corrupt/incompatible entries.
|
|
Originally Posted by prodigalfish
First of all....a Thank You whtrbt7 for helping us all out with these Exchange issues. Unfortunately I saw no posts relating to the problem I am having.
I just set up the 4smartphone trial (pro)- everythings syncing on my PC just fine. The problem is on my Torq P100. It doesn't seem to want to sync on its own (as far as the "sync as it arrives" option). If I manually sync avtivesync to the exchange server, only then do I get the emails I know are there (just sending myself a bunch of test emails). Im not sure of the technical terminology, but from what I've read the way it works is a "silent" sms message is sent to the ppc which triggers it to connect gprs then sync...? This seemed to work for only a few times right when I was done setting up the 4smartphone account. I also long ago changed my phone email (for sms) from <phone number>@tmomail.net to <nickname>@tmomail.net. Don't know if this may be causing the issue or at least a part of it. All the 4SP setup messages did come through just fine though with it having <phone number>@tmomail.net in its records. Not to mention I wouldn't be receiving texts from anyone if this were the case. I see the ppc actually starting a sync on its own periodically but it finishes w/o pulling any new emails. Even making calendar changes on my PC doesn't seem to make it to the Torq w/o a manual sync. Since then I've set up a couple sub-folders (it's a catch-all email) but it seemed to stop working even before I did that. I don't know if this is on 4smartphone's end but something tells me it may be unrealiable T-Mobile sms service. Any light you could shed on this problem would be greatly appreciated. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Sorry but MSFP doesn't improve on normal AUTD. You're better off with AUTD via HTTP.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
You need to use <phonenumber>@tmomail.net in order to make AUTD work. The <nickname>@tmomail.net is not a root address hence, you won't get AUTD since it is getting forwarded. Also make sure that you are syncing outgoing items as they are sent. It's possible that you need a real account or need your account reset to work properly.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
The SP2 patch is currently available
|
|
Will Windows Mobile 5.0 allow MS Exchange users to control mail redirection via the client like the BlackBerry Desktop Redirector will? I would eventually like to retire my BlackBerry and go with a Treo running MS Windows Mobile 5.0. We manage everything in our infrastructure with the exception of the Exchange servers so this option is very important. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Correction on that, the SP2 patch is currently available but not public. Sorry about not being clear about that.
@ctalmadg The Exchange redirector is essentially Outlook 2003. You can set up your own redirection if needed but it would be a little stupid. Why redirect your mail when you can set forwarding to POP3 or IMAP accounts directly to your Exchange account. It's much more useful to go with a direct EAS connection to the WM5.x device. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
With WM5.x it will be "real time" after the SP2 upgrade to Exchange but there are still download times. If you choose to get your attachments with your e-mails then it will take longer but the attachments then become local copies which you can edit and then return after alterations. Your e-mails don't need to get directed since your WM5.x device acts as a client device much like Outlook 2003 acts as a client for Exchange. If you use multiple e-mail accounts, I would recommend forwarders to the Exchange account. My basic policy uses better SCL (Spam Confidence Level) filtering on a POP or IMAP server before hitting Exchange. This way you can get the best of all worlds. If you need everything secured even tighter, I would suggest a centralized Exchange tree but you will need to use a more advanced (and more expensive) SCL filter.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Ouch, Exchange 2000? Make sure you have the mobility pack installed and the ports are open for AES (Exchange ActiveSync). If not, then you can just keep Outlook open as a redirector/forwarder. If you redirect to a hosted Exchange running SP2, then you could AES which would be instant.
|
PIETER KNOOK (Senior Vice President, Mobile and Embedded Devices Division and Communications Sector Business Well, it's a little hard to compare perfectly because, of course, Windows Mobile users, first of all, they're using more richness in their device, since they can get all the attachments, since I mean this is a policy decision, by the way, so when I say "can" that depends on how the device is configured. But if you want PowerPoint presentations to be delivered to your device so that you can in turn present those, you can do that on your device. If you want to have your tasks synchronized to the device, you can do that. If you want to respond to meeting invitations, then you can do that on the device. So we do see higher usage patterns I would say per e—mail that's being transported.There are many ways in which we've minimized the amount of data traffic, so we've introduced a new compression technology and, in fact, even when you forward attachments on e—mails, those attachments do not travel over the wire more than once because if I forward an e—mail to somebody else, the attachment is held on the server and doesn't travel over the wireless network, so there are many ways like that in which we're extremely efficient in the way that we use the data tariff. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
You need to use <phonenumber>@tmomail.net in order to make AUTD work. The <nickname>@tmomail.net is not a root address hence, you won't get AUTD since it is getting forwarded. Also make sure that you are syncing outgoing items as they are sent. It's possible that you need a real account or need your account reset to work properly.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
If you still have a problem after changing the settings, it's a T-mobile/4SP problem. There was a patch that needed to go onto the server for AUTD to work properly. As for new message indicators, it still isn't resolved. I think it will get resolved in Photon when they make the Today page more customizable.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
I'm back.
@matchtrader Yes, the attachment doesn't need to be downloaded in order to forward it. You just hit forward and the server will do the rest. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@wahidu
You also need to have MSFP installed on your WM5.x device. The push is very reliable and I don't have any major issues with the HTTP push/pull. It only works on WM5.x devices with MSFP though. |
|
Originally Posted by wahidu
Thanks for the feedback. I am interested only with HTTP push/pull (no SMS). I have searched the net but couldn't find the MSFP. Could you please provide me relevent link or software itself if possible?
|
) - I would rate my self a novice when it comes to Activesync.
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
If you don't want to use the installer, you just need to have your settings for the 4smartphone account. They should have it posted on their site after you log in. AUTD should work as well unless you have carrier issues with AUTD.
|
|
Originally Posted by nv00021
If anyone can help me with issue it would be great, as I have email the support people for 4Smartphone for support and have gotten nothing...
I get to the point in the set up process where is asks me to save the .cpf (CAB) file. I click yes of course and then I get the following message: CHANGE OF DEVICE SETTING UNSUCCESSFUL Installation of nick.vlittas@premiereglobal.com_p_.cpf was unsucessful. The program or setting cannot be installed because it does not have sufficient system permission. Please help.....I need to get this going before I leave for the US on a business trip next week. Thanks NJV |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Wow, a EAP-TLS setup with MS Exchange is quite rare. I take it you guys are running an 802.11i wireless network. I have a link that will get you started. It's a little funky but it works in EAP-TLS via WM2003SE. The reason why you don't find much documentation on this procedure is due to the fact that it's not generally accepted. It also requires a 3rd party program to get EAP-TLS setup correctly since the authentication protocols need to be sent.
http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/crtimprt.html |

|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Let me get this straight, you can't get e-mails sent to your phone by mail addresses that have the SMTP nomenclature on the mail address? No matter what, all e-mail on the internet is sent using SMTP. Your carrier can however control your sending and receiving of e-mails based on your account. Some carriers require the use of their own POP/IMAP and SMTP servers. Exchange Activesync (EAS) however works differently. Instead of using normal ports such as 25 and 110 for e-mail, it uses port 80 to pull information from the exchange server. AUTD is still flakey so it won't function perfectly. I take it that your issue isn't with AUTD since you want to forward mails to an external e-mail to SMS converter. If you forward a copy of your mails to and SMS converter, AUTD should still work but you would receive your e-mails as SMS. Your carrier has an SMS e-mail address for you so if you forward your mails directly to the SMS e-mail address, you get your e-mails in text form on your phone.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
AUTD can be used using your myphonenumber@vodafone.com.au address. You aren't sending an e-mail to your PPCPE, instead, you are sending a silent SMS which facilitates a pull to the Exchange server. If you are having issues with AUTD (since it is not entirely reliable), I suggest using the scheduled syncs.
|
|
Originally Posted by EvanZ06
We don't use a proxy server, we allow http/https access for our normal users (of course, I have full access) through the firewall itself. The exchange server is accessible from outside, the problem seems to be that once the phone connects via activesync on the PC, using the internal network, it can then no longer properly resolve the DNS name to the external IP without resetting. I've checked, and I can conect to the external IP without resetting, it just won't properly resolve the DNS name. Looks like this is one more reason to push the management for an ISA(proxy) server.
|
|
Originally Posted by EvanZ06
Installed SP2 night before last. Tasks sync directly with server works without any problems. Haven't tried the AUTD over http yet.
|
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@Luch Wow, a complete fresh setup! I love those. Ummmmm let's see, where to start? You need to setup the exchange server properly. If you are just beginning this, I would highly recommend hiring an Exchange sys admin to help you or do it for you. You can always watch them to learn the process of setting up a new server/cluster. I'm of the self-taught breed so if you want to do it yourself, you do need to read a lot of articles found at Microsoft since those provide the best reference materials. Deployment is a little different but still manageable. Regarding your e-mail volume: you may want to nix AUTD since it won't handle your mail volume very well. For cases of over 60 e-mails per day, I recommend using a scheduled sync every 15 minutes. Once MSFP and SP2 are generally public, you can use the "push" method on SP2 to get faster e-mails. If you have more specific questions regarding exchange I could answer them for you but I would seriously recommend reading MS literature or hiring a sys admin for setup. Worst case scenario is that you crash the AD and have to reinstall. Have fun! =) |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Ah, I thought you didn't have anything setup. The procedure for AES is the same one from MS. It's been the same since 2001 I think. You just need to go into the system manager (exchange) and set up mobile access. Other than that, the rest of the settings on the server should be the same unless you have security issues. If you are running ISA server, it should be extremely easy. Oh, almost forgot: make sure you open the ports specified on the MS instructions. I normally open those specific ports completely so I don't get DNS resolution failures.
|
|
INTERNET_45 INTERNET_45 (ERROR_INTERNET_INVALID_CA): Synchronization failed. The security certificate on the server is invalid. Contact your system administrator or ISP to install a valid certificate on the server and try again. Explanation: The synchronization client tried to validate the certificates, but it detected that a certificate that is not valid is installed. User Action: Install a valid certificate on the server, and then try to synchronize again. By default, the following root certificates are installed on Pocket PC 2002 devices. Verisign Class 1 Public Primary CA Verisign Class 2 Public Primary CA Verisign Class 3 Public Primary CA Verisign Class 3 Public Primary CA (2028) GTE Cybertrust ROOT GTE Cybertrust Solutions ROOT Thawte Server CA Thawte Premium Server CA Entrust.net Secure Server Entrust.net CA (2048 bit) If you are using a certificate that is not trusted, you can turn off certificate validation on the device by using a .cab file that is provided in the Support\Tools\Disable SSL folder on the Microsoft Mobile Information CD. Copy the AS_Cert_OFF.cab file to your device, and then run the program on your device. |
|
Originally Posted by Luch
the CA addon was installed on one of our GC Servers. I guess I can either install it on the exchange server and create a new cert for it or purchase one from a trusged company such as verisign....
but is there nothing else I can do? or are these 2 my only options? |
|
Originally Posted by Wallace Lau
Oh one more thing... since you have a home brew Exchange server, once you get the cert going, if you still have problem sync'ing and you get some kind of permission denied error (0x85010004), check your IIS security settings in your exchange box, specifically IP restrictions. For some reason my Exchange box allows all IP to access the OWA web-app (/exchange and /exchweb) but defaulted to only allowed local IP addresses to access the ActiveSync web-app (/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync). So initially all my GPRS/EDGE sync was all denied by IIS, same for even USB connections (the device will pick up a 169.254.2.x/24 address... not the desktop's address. I suppose the desktop is doing some NAT'ing for the device). Until I open up those IP restrictions on the ActiveSync "virtual directory", my 9100 won't sync directly with Exchange.
W. |
... but for the time being I have it working via ActiveSync
|
Originally Posted by Wallace Lau
Oh one more thing... since you have a home brew Exchange server, once you get the cert going, if you still have problem sync'ing and you get some kind of permission denied error (0x85010004), check your IIS security settings in your exchange box, specifically IP restrictions. For some reason my Exchange box allows all IP to access the OWA web-app (/exchange and /exchweb) but defaulted to only allowed local IP addresses to access the ActiveSync web-app (/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync). So initially all my GPRS/EDGE sync was all denied by IIS, same for even USB connections (the device will pick up a 169.254.2.x/24 address... not the desktop's address. I suppose the desktop is doing some NAT'ing for the device). Until I open up those IP restrictions on the ActiveSync "virtual directory", my 9100 won't sync directly with Exchange.
W. |
|
Originally Posted by angst911
0x85010004
I'm seeing this lovely error on some of our 15 PPC-6700 devices.. I've never gotten it personally but a bunch of others have... I'm lost as to what is causing it. |
|
Originally Posted by Wallace Lau
You will need to add your CA's root cert into the device. If I understand it correctly, the device is still not trusting your home-brew cert (since you have your own CA, and your CA obviously is not trusted by the device by default). The same problem will also occur even if you let Exchange generate its own cert (instead of using your in-house CA), because Exchange's cert won't be from a trusted root CA either.
I have to run through the same process because I am using a GoDaddy cert on my Exchange server, and although its a public cert it is a intermediate cert backed by ValiCert, which of cause was NOT part of the default trusted Certificate Authority (ala Verisign or Thawts) in the device. Anyway, to install the cert in your device you simply need to export it from your server and run the cert in your PPC. My 9100 recognize the .cer file format and automatically imported the root cert without having to install any additional software. Anyway, assuming you know enough about Exchange and CA, here are the simplified steps. 1. Open IE and go to your OWA interface. Double click on the "lock" icon on the bottom to see the detail of your current cert, and go to "Certification Path". If more then one cert is listed on the path, write down the top item which is the root CA your server is using. It might be something like www.YourCompany.com or server.YourCompany.com depends on how you set Exchange and your CA up. 2. Go to either your exchange or GC box, open MMC (Start -> Run -> "MMC" -> Ok) and add the Certificates Snap-in (not Certificate Authority snap-in) for your "computer account" / "local computer". Alternatively you can run the MMC from your desktop and remotely open your Exchange box's computer account... but to be safe I'd terminal-service to the Exchange box and do it from there. 3. Open up the "Trusted Root Certificate Authorities" tree, and under "Certificates" look for one that is named exactly like the one you found on #1. Right click, All Task, Export and export it as a DER Encoded X.509 cert. 4. Copy the exported cert onto your iMate. 5. Open up File Explorer in your iMate, find that file, and double click to execute. It should automatically imported the cert. 6. Now try sync'ing again. Good luck. Wallace |
|
Originally Posted by spartanrob
Great thread, but I still need help. Trying to sync my K-Jam. My IT guys can see my trying to get in, but i can't sync. They say i'm coming in on port 443 but something the header is making it appear like it's coming in on port 80 so it's getting blocked. This is the error i'm getting: Your account in Exchange Server does not have permission to sync with your current settings.
Any help is appreciated. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
Okie I'm here!!!!
A server admin can "see" people going in and out in the logs (verbose or otherwise). If you have a corporate firewall, you can also see the logs on there. Port 443 is the SSL port. Normally, if you set your AES for SSL, you use this port to process a secure activesync. You also need access to port 80 since that is a general port where most Exchange info is passed through. Okie, recommendation time: If you are using SSL, turn it off and direct traffic through 80 and 8080 to the Exchange server. If it works without SSL, that means your SSL setup was incorrect the first time. Try re-enstating the SSL and make sure your certificates are correct. |
|
Originally Posted by defii
I use 1and1 as my hosted Exchange Server. Up until recently, photos would not synchronize from my Outlook desktop to my QTEK 9100. Today, the photos simply appeared. I was under the impression from a posting on this thread the the Exchange Server could not synchronize photos.
Another issue is the Tasks. They do not synchronize either. Is there some sort of update that needs to be done (say the recent service pack)? |
|
Originally Posted by defii
Another issue is the Tasks. They do not synchronize either. Is there some sort of update that needs to be done (say the recent service pack)?
|
|
Originally Posted by Wallace Lau
Did your IT guy tell you where/how they "see" you coming in? Via the corporate firewall? It is possible that your sync request is coming in through the firewall fine only to be blocked by IIS (similar to my case). In that case perhaps the JAM fall back to port 80 and the firewall ended up blocking it thereafter. If you can have your IT guy check the IIS directory's security settings (read my post dated 11/3/05), that would be a good start. At least you can eliminate one factor of it and its a simple thing to check. Thereafter follow Luch and whtrbt7's instructions - if you have not already done so.
Otherwise I am sure whtrbt7 will have more question to help you debug your particular scenario... Wallace |

|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@Urban Strata
Okie, it sounds like you don't know where to start. First thing you need to do is ask your Network admin if the Exchange 2000 server has the mobility pack installed. If not, you're not going to be able to synchronize to the server directly. If it is installed, then you need to enter in the FQDN of the server and also check the SSL box. You should have your username, password, and domain ready. These will be entered when you start the Exchange server setup in the Activesync wizard on the WM5.x device. Keep in mind that if you don't have OTA Activesync, you can still Activesync to Outlook 2003 on a PC. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@Urban Strata
Are you using a VPN portal to get into your network? If yes and you are on T-mobile, you need to be on their corporate internet plans and access the internet3 APN. If you don't VPN into your network then that message means that you are firewalled or you don't have the mobility pack. |
|
Originally Posted by whtrbt7
@urban strata
If you don't already have the mobility pack for Exchange 2000, you won't be able to synchronize. It's a separate package for older Exchange 2000 systems. Exchange 2003 has it built in already, hence you can synchronize with Exchange 2003 servers almost out of the box. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2009
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser