|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
I just want to extend a special thank you to the kid who leaked the UMTS/HSDPA stuff off CSP onto this forum. Because of you, I am unable to access the UMTS link on CSP to get important information for 3 of my customers that require it today. Next time you have the brilliant idea to publish CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY information to the world, do the rest of us a favor and smash your computer keyboard and screen.
Thanks for costing me a couple grand... |
|
Originally Posted by noodles5666
Hey hey hey. Come on now. What do you need. Most of the information you can get on here. What were you looking for.
|
|
Originally Posted by kilowatt
if it is costing you a couple of grand use your head find the info you need somewhere other than CSP.
|
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
If a kid didn't leak the info I wouldn't have to spend 2 hours wasting my time trying to get the UMTS info from other sources, which costs me more money. As I said in my other post, I'll get the sale later, but I have to wait until I can get back in for another meeting.
Either way, I really hope this kid gets what's coming to him. I know the Upper Management wants his head on a stick, and if he has ever logged into HoFo from his NT Log-in, they will have it soon enough. |
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Every post you make is concerning money and how much you make. Maybe some of us come here to find things other than how great nskgti23's job is. There is something to be said for modesty.
|
|
Originally Posted by Imari
If this is information that you have to have regularly, shouldn't you KNOW it by now without having to look it up every time? Or even have it printed out somewhere?
|
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Every post you make is concerning money and how much you make. Maybe some of us come here to find things other than how great nskgti23's job is. There is something to be said for modesty.
|
|
Originally Posted by samab
I disagree with you 100%.
In order to even keep this hofo forum alive --- you have to keep the lawyers from suing howard to get that kid's ip address. As a Canadian, I don't want the canadian side of hofo getting side-swiped by these events. |
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Every post you make is concerning money and how much you make. Maybe some of us come here to find things other than how great nskgti23's job is. There is something to be said for modesty.
|
|
Originally Posted by samab
I disagree with you 100%.
In order to even keep this hofo forum alive --- you have to keep the lawyers from suing howard to get that kid's ip address. As a Canadian, I don't want the canadian side of hofo getting side-swiped by these events. |
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Maybe I didn't make myself clear. The kid is wrong who did it obviously and Cingular is idiotic for releasing the information on such an easily available site. Their UMTS equipment vendors are pretty forthcoming about their sales to cingular, no surprise as to where the equipment is being shipped.
I knew many blue B2B reps, I was even recruited to be one. I don't remember any of them being so ... abrasive and avaricious. Just an opinion. Take it for that. |
|
Originally Posted by SuxBeingU
I can vouch for him not all are about money he has quite a library of posts bashing indirects dealers too.
|
|
Originally Posted by ibclubbin
(in my Napoleon Dynamite voice) what a friggin idiot!
some hofo reject has the balls to post confidential info like that...hopefully he is canned ASAP for his Code of Conduct violation |
|
Originally Posted by 3rdshift
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone MM-7400/US/1.0) NetFront/3.1 MMP/2.0)
im glad that kid did what he did, you cannot stop non-conformists. i also quite like your reaction, its so....greed driven...while at the same time bloody hilarious. ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by mo162
sorry but I'm a little pissed at this kid as well and also how Hofo handeled it. the thread should have been taken down the SECOND it was noticed and a new one started just talking about UMTS without confidential info leaked. Now that this site cannot be trusted to adhere to and respecting that, Hofo will be watched and most likely banned from work sooner or later.
I'll agree with nksgti23 and add that this kid royally screwed us and himself. I'd be just as pissed as nksgti23 is considering his situation. put yourself in his shoes and then say "oh well, that sucks". |
|
Originally Posted by mo162
I know Hofo is not owend by cingular but there are forums out there that have cingular specific areas that respect confidentiality of every carrier they have a forum for. it just seems inconsiderate to me that Hofo wouldn't respect another carrier in that way just to get some publicity.
|
|
Originally Posted by AmsterdamRave
Funny i didnt see anyone saying it was wrong when Confidential information for Verizon or Sprint got leaked. I mean if your really a Confidentialiy Jockey then it would be in general not just selective
And since were talking about breaking the NDA why were there threads leaking info on ringback tunes,the HP,the Nokia Flip,Threads on upcoming Rate plans if you were truly upset over the leaks then those would count as well... |
|
Originally Posted by mo162
you know, you're right. leaking is leaking. but there is a difference of saying what is going to come and giving out a corporate website. that's where the frustration lies. not necessarily leaking the UMTS stuff, but CSP itself. There's a lot on there, not just the UMTS stuff.
If I was here during the sprint and verizon leak similiar to this, I'm sure I'd be saying the same thing. |
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
I should have KNOWN that some kid was going to take the info that was just posted on an internal site and post it on the net? I should have known that they were going to lock the entire UMTS site down because of such post?
|

|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
I just want to extend a special thank you to the kid who leaked the UMTS/HSDPA stuff off CSP onto this forum. Because of you, I am unable to access the UMTS link on CSP to get important information for 3 of my customers that require it today. Next time you have the brilliant idea to publish CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY information to the world, do the rest of us a favor and smash your computer keyboard and screen.
Thanks for costing me a couple grand... |
|
Originally Posted by mulletwireless
You might want to read Cingular policy on using blogs, just by posting you could end up losing your job...
|
|
Originally Posted by mulletwireless
you were a little behind the times it was posted by WSJ weeks before it ended up on hofo, wired mag had news about it, UK's T3 ran a big artical on it. It is the nature of the beast you have something people will find out about it before the company say yes it is true or no it is not. Many hofo members are the real wireless insiders. You might want to read Cingular policy on using blogs, just by posting you could end up losing your job...
|
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
There is a difference between speculation and internal documents being released... The WSJ did not have release dates or a market list.
And Sonix, I have actually done work with the CI team and it is stated that if a document says Confidential/Proprietary, no matter how it was obtained, it can not be distributed to the company. I understand that HoFo is not a carrier, but there should be some ethics upheld on this board. Internal documents are just that, Internal.... As I said, if the kid wanted to leak stuff in his own words, I might have had a different tone. Or if he wanted to provide the info to someone to post, there would have been nothing Cingular could have done. The issue is he was so brash about openly working for cingular and posting it... A little sleezy in my book. |
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
I believe there is actually legal code on it, but I am not sure where it is based.
CI is competetive intellegence... I'll try and find the legal reference. |
|
Originally Posted by Sonix
“CI is competetive intellegence... “
It sounds like language in a contract between either a carrier and employees or between competitive carriers, I suspect the first. If thats the case it isn't a violation of any law, and is a breach of contract for either party. Again assuming its not a code violation(law) HoFo isn't bound to it. The “KID” my be liable, and if the agreement includes remedies they will be enforceable by a judge. This point may be mute because, in this case those remedies most likely wont be recoverable. Again assuming these are the facts I find it hard to believe Cingular would sue him. To what end? Cingular would have to show real damages, risk bad press suing a “Kid”, and pay an attorney several thousand dollars. In the end they may recover nothing. |
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Competetive Intelligence: either A. you are making little spreadsheets with other carriers plans listing who has what or B. You are actively trying to acquire (steal) confidential and proprietary information of other carriers.
So you got outspied. So which are you Nskgti23? A or B. |
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
They have completely pulled the UMTS info from the intranet... So NO ONE has access right now...
One thing that I find interesting is that HoFo does not follow the same laws that carriers have to. If something says confidential/proprietary for another carrier they are not legally allowed to display that info internally. Sure they can discuss it and use it, but they can not post said info on their company intranet. Only publically disclosed info and be "released" internally to other carriers. HoFo on the other hand feels free to allow users to post internal documents... The original thread should have been deleted. If the kid wanted to post all the info, but not use the actual document, that would be one thing, but he posted the entire document. |
|
Originally Posted by Agent2563
Competetive Intelligence: either A. you are making little spreadsheets with other carriers plans listing who has what or B. You are actively trying to acquire (steal) confidential and proprietary information of other carriers.
So you got outspied. So which are you Nskgti23? A or B. |
|
Originally Posted by nskgti23
Sonix-
I got some clarification on the legal/ethical codes of confidential/proprietary documents. It is unethical for a carrier to use confidential/proprietary documents from a competitor. This isn't to say that people can't view them, but that they should not be used to influence competetive pricing or strategy. The legal aspect of this is more in regards to the people that disclose confidential info. A company is able to terminate and even take legal/finacial action against the parties that disclose internal documents. |
|
Originally Posted by sevensinz777
... hypocrite... and when i say that i mean... your crying about leaking info right? ... but you yourself is leaking info about the very code of conduct you are protecting? duh-
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser