|
Originally Posted by Airb330
To think the s710a was $200ish dollars 6 months ago...!
|
|
Originally Posted by pauldg
S710 was a nicer phone (better screen, better camera). wasn't the W600 supposed to be a cheaper version of the s710?
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by AtomicGarden
I was a tad bit upset about seeing the price drop AFTER I had paid $149.99 on premier 2 weeks previous. But, meh, what can you do?
Guess I should've waited ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by NWSternGirl
It has "snazzy" features, but I only care about reception. Everything else is cake to me. I'm gonna stick with shopping for a Nokia. |
|
Originally Posted by xbox360gamer
I would put my W600's reception right up there with any Nokia phone I've owned. yes, the W600 is that good considering its technically classified as a mid range phone.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser