vB Easy Archive - 1.3 mega pixel camera ratings

Pages: 1

1.3 mega pixel camera ratings
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

Aside from the s710, which is probably the best 1.3 camera, how do the others compare to one another, ex: w600,2125,mpx220,6682,8125 ect how would u rank them and anyone have comparable pics.

Posted by: Jakes

MY W600i has taken better pictures than my S710a ever did.

Posted by: beatniks3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake15

MY W600i has taken better pictures than my S710a ever did.

have any to show us and compare?

i just posted a thread wondering basically the same thing, well i guess between just the w600 and 8125 but one of all 1.3mp is interesting too.

Posted by: koao

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake15

MY W600i has taken better pictures than my S710a ever did.

The w600i takes good outdoor pictures in good light, but I dunno about s710a, but I thought s710a > w600i in camera.

Posted by: beatniks3

i've used the cameras on the s710a, the 6682 and the 8125, and i would probably rank them in that order in terms of pictures.

Posted by: C_Topher

The w600 takes good clear pictures in good light. In slightly dark areas (even with the flash) the w600 pictures are very dark. The 2125 takes pretty crummy pictures - not sharp or detailed. The pictures remind me of my VGA phone, just larger.

Posted by: cjmedina

i looked on my computer for some of my camera pictures first
s710a

second nokia 6682

third samsung zx10

fourth mpx220

5 cingular 2125

another

Posted by: dasupaman23

[QUOTE=cjmedina]i looked on my computer for some of my camera pictures first

second nokia 6682

MMM....the Yardhouse!!! Do I see a Hef and a Newcastle?

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

I just recieved my w600, ive had the mpx 220 and the s710 the s710 has the best camera, w600 in daylight is very good also and mpx220 isnt that great colors arent good, and a bit more blurry.

Posted by: agent623

Sorry about the large size of the pics.

6682's camera:

Lg 9800 pic (for 1.3mp compaison):

Posted by: cjmedina

Quote:

Originally Posted by dasupaman23

[QUOTE=cjmedina]i looked on my computer for some of my camera pictures first

second nokia 6682

MMM....the Yardhouse!!! Do I see a Hef and a Newcastle?

if i remeber correct its blue moon and longcost (not sure) rasberry

Posted by: emo_bear

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake15

MY W600i has taken better pictures than my S710a ever did.

i agree with this

Posted by: Binx75075

cjmedina......

The picture taken with the s710a blows me away. That is so clear.......

Motorola RAZR picture

Also Motorola RAZR (taken at a Paul Van Dyk show)

Posted by: Rok3nIt

Anyone have pics taken with the w600i? Could someone do a comparison with a completely dark pic without the flash then another one with the flash? Thanks!

Posted by: emo_bear

7 out of 10 for ranking, will be postin pictures up soon.

Posted by: Rok3nIt

Thanks, can you do the flash thing?

Posted by: newtype2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by Binx75075

cjmedina......

The picture taken with the s710a blows me away. That is so clear.......

Motorola RAZR picture

Also Motorola RAZR (taken at a Paul Van Dyk show)

I had no idea the razr could take pics that good...how was PvD!?

Posted by: Rok3nIt

But if the razr's pictures are that good, I'm excited to see what my w600i's pictures are gunna look like, my FREE w600i hehe. We'll see on tuesday.

Posted by: TheRupp

That's definitely a Blue Moon with the orange in it

Posted by: Rok3nIt

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRupp

That's definitely a Blue Moon with the orange in it

I don't get it...

Posted by: dasupaman23

He was talking about the beer... BTW I put an orange in my Hef, gives it a better taste than a lemon. (learned that from beer tasting at B.J's)

Posted by: Rok3nIt

I got my w600i and was shocked how terrible the pictures looked indoors, but they look awesome outdoors. My razr was good inside as well as outside. Any updates for camera res.?

Posted by: cjmedina

rok3nit are you gonna post any pictures i will post some pics of taken with my samsung zx10 later today

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

w600

s710

mpx 220 indoors

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

mpx 220 at 640x480

w600

s710

Posted by: Rok3nIt

I would post some but I don't know how to get the picutures from my phone off onto my computer. If I knew how to do that then I would post some.

Posted by: Cardiff Giant

The w600 pictures look good but they don't really look any clearer to me than the Razr pics, they look ok but nothing fantastic. Luckily, an OK camera is good enough for my needs. I'm still heavily leaning towards the W600 if I end up going with Cingular in June when my contract with Sprint ends.

Posted by: zerilos

6682:

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardiff Giant

The w600 pictures look good but they don't really look any clearer to me than the Razr pics, they look ok but nothing fantastic. Luckily, an OK camera is good enough for my needs. I'm still heavily leaning towards the W600 if I end up going with Cingular in June when my contract with Sprint ends.

The camera is much better than the razr, colors are clearer no haze or fog over pic, exspecially if u reduce pic to the razr size.

Posted by: zerilos

W600i:

Oh and I know the OP didn't ask for this, but for giggles... SE V800/Z800i:

I think 8125 and MPX220 still need to be posted?

Posted by: SymbianBlack

The 6682 is a good 1.3mp camera. Not bad at all but can be better a solid 7 out of 10 rating. the s710 looks a little clearer. Also You have to look at the color contrasts...

Posted by: CIAlias

What about the CU320? I just ordered that and I'm waiting for it to arrive in the mail!

Posted by: cjmedina

here are a cople from the lg cu320 its not the best at pictures but its k kinda blurry
first pic of fhm mag ranking this phone in the top six

second and third golf course first one normal

second daylight settings

third my son moving in black and white

Posted by: CIAlias

Those are awful! I mean the quality, not your style of photography.

Posted by: cjmedina

Wirelessly posted (whatever the next lines says: SGH-ZX10 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.2 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

I told you they werent that good

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

Quote:

Originally Posted by zerilos

W600i:

Oh and I know the OP didn't ask for this, but for giggles... SE V800/Z800i:

I think 8125 and MPX220 still need to be posted?

I posted mpx 220.

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

w600

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

The w600 takes pretty good pics in daylight.

Posted by: Cardiff Giant

Quote:

Originally Posted by THETRUTH#34

The camera is much better than the razr, colors are clearer no haze or fog over pic, exspecially if u reduce pic to the razr size.

that's true, the smaller pics on the w600 do like pretty nice, the large ones just look like sand paper. Sprint has some nice cameras on their phones but that's about all their current crop of phones has going for it to me.

Posted by: cjmedina

ok here are some from my other 3g phone samsung z-x10 much better quailty imho
first some day time pictures of a flower

second when you have to much money the thing you have in the kitchen

Posted by: Rok3nIt

Yeah the w600i's take awesome pics outdoors. Those cu350 pictures were awful! (again, the quality)

Posted by: fonioflip

how does everyone's 6682 pictures look so nice... it doesn't look like 1.3 megapixels... the quality seems a bit lower... should i call cingular about this?

Posted by: Turbos15

Posted by: THETRUTH#34

nokia 6682

w600

Not much of a difference, actually the w600 is the more natural picture

Posted by: Cardiff Giant

Looks nice! I just wish the W600 behave more like a flip phone in terms of locking the keypad and also answering an incoming call (I wish you could just spin it open to answer). I'll probably pass on it for that reason alone.

Posted by: Xavier007

Wirelessly posted (Xavier's V400: Nokia6682/2.0 (4.62.0) SymbianOS/8.0 Series60/2.6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

It looks like u didn't take the pix in the same amount of sunlight.

Posted by: Xavier007

Wirelessly posted (Xavier's V400: Nokia6682/2.0 (4.62.0) SymbianOS/8.0 Series60/2.6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

Quote:

Originally Posted by THETRUTH#34

nokia 6682

w600

Not much of a difference, actually the w600 is the more natural picture

It looks like u didn't take the pix in the same amount of sunlight.

Posted by: Xavier007

Wirelessly posted (Xavier's V400: Nokia6682/2.0 (4.62.0) SymbianOS/8.0 Series60/2.6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

Quote:

Originally Posted by THETRUTH#34

nokia 6682

w600

Not much of a difference, actually the w600 is the more natural picture

It looks like u didn't take the pix in the same amount of sunlight.

Posted by: Xavier007

Wirelessly posted (Xavier's V400: Nokia6682/2.0 (4.62.0) SymbianOS/8.0 Series60/2.6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

I have a nokia 6682 and the pix in the dark with flash are pretty good.

Posted by: SeanZ0r

Yupp, the 6682's flash is amazing! Ive owned the s710a and w600 ill dig up some pics!

Posted by: SeanZ0r

s710a 1280x760

s710a 640x480

Dont have any ones from the w600i : C
Heres a few from 6682 all in 640 i think
Example of how brite the flash can get sometimes. (when it shouldent)

One of my friends, outside

But i must say the 6682's video is the less choppiest.

Posted by: roxatBASEketbal

The 6682 video is horrilble.

Posted by: SeanZ0r

wtf no, it's the least "blocky" when compared to s710a, and w600.

Posted by: Cardiff Giant

view from my seats from tonight's Red Sox/Mets game at Fenway. 12th Red Sox win in a row!

Not great but definitely serviceable for a camera phone and better than my last camera phone.