|
Originally Posted by ZacHolley
carried both the w600 is far better
|
|
Originally Posted by Rok3nIt
I dare to be different.
I vote for the RAZR! It ACTUALLY had less problems than my w600i, and I now know how to fix the razr problems. Call volume! Moto kit or mobile phone tools I believe, you can adjust the in call volume and the ringer volume to go over the max. I believe on the scale, since it goes to 7, it would be considered a 9 or a 10. The razr was a beautiful phone, my favorite, but the w600i, not so much. Doesn't really appeal to me. Sorry. |
|
Originally Posted by acadiel
I just got rid of my W600i and bought a 6230 from Nokia. I like it a whole lot more.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Rok3nIt
I have owned both. Although the w600i is more glam, the 1.3 MP camera doesn't fascinate me. Now my 12 MP Digital camera does. The walkman is basically a simple add on for me, I have a video iPod. I hate the keypad on the w600i, the only thing I really like about it to be honest is the MEdia net. Other than that, The RAZR get's my vote.
|
|
Originally Posted by octoberrox03
but if my .3 MP cam on my RAZR takes better pics than my 1.3 MP on my 600, that says something.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by acadiel
I just got rid of my W600i and bought a 6230 from Nokia. I like it a whole lot more.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Cardiff Giant
ended up exchanging the razr for a (drum roll) W600 and reception and the UI are way better and it has a louder earpiece as well.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser