although I'm sure theyre quality -any ideas for a replacement phone which wont leave me craving my old gx20 screen?
|
Originally Posted by kaizoku_san
Nokia is the most mentioned to you because North America has so many Nokia and SE fanboys, it gets annoying after a while. The quality of their screens/cameras is nowhere near that of Sharp's quality.
While Nokia brags about their "oooo ahhhh" Carl Zeiss lens, Sharp just sits back, confident that theirs beats out all others. And the screen.. well, you've seen a Sharp screen. ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by break-r
thats very true..haha..i've yet to see a GSM phone that beats out Sharp's camera and screen quality
|
|
Originally Posted by kaizoku_san
Yep.. pretty sad, I was just reading the "Nokia N80 vs. Sony Ericsson K800: 3 megapixel shootout" article over at gsmarena.. the K800 pics look really nice, but seriously, it took them a LONG time to catch up to Sharp. The 903SH came out what.. last August, was it? Something like that.
And even with their super special Zeiss lens, the Nokia camera is still the loser, just like the N90 was when it came out (man, that one took blurry pics, not sharp at all). Nice effort Nokia/SE, but you gotta do better than that to win over the people who are smart enough to buy a Sharp. ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Timsta
all these guys talking about theri sony being the king of the world. that thing doesn't even have optical zoom.. what a joke.. just wait..
|
|
Originally Posted by break-r
^ i think that was a CDMA LG phone..someone on hofo had it and posted pics right?
|
|
Originally Posted by azn_boi_128
was it a LG? always thought there was a 5mpx samsung not sure not sure....
|
|
Originally Posted by break-r
who knows..i could be wrong as well
but the pics were amazing |
|
Originally Posted by Timsta
lg has 5megpaixel tooo.. aldiggi uses one.. he posts very often in the other manu forums.. its so nice.. cdma tho
|
|
Originally Posted by kaizoku_san
Yep.. pretty sad, I was just reading the "Nokia N80 vs. Sony Ericsson K800: 3 megapixel shootout" article over at gsmarena.. the K800 pics look really nice, but seriously, it took them a LONG time to catch up to Sharp. The 903SH came out what.. last August, was it? Something like that.
And even with their super special Zeiss lens, the Nokia camera is still the loser, just like the N90 was when it came out (man, that one took blurry pics, not sharp at all). Nice effort Nokia/SE, but you gotta do better than that to win over the people who are smart enough to buy a Sharp. ![]() |
i really coem to appreciate the video recording of the n70 that i'm using now, but then sharp's screen and camera beats it to the hell~~
|
Originally Posted by Timsta
well... even if it had a carl zeiss lens.. it doesn't make a difference.. the lens that nokia introduced for their phone was just pure junk.. they just use the poor guys name and everyone went gaga and then found out hte lens wasn't up to carl zeiss standards.. and now sony's jumped the bandwagon and introduced cybershot.. and again... less than good standards
|
|
Originally Posted by Timsta
yup exactly.. when you buy a jaguar.. you are purchasing a ford engine.. its horrible.
|
|
Originally Posted by jowlie
Have Sharp fixed some stupid faults like e.g.
-Alarm doesnt go off when the phone is off -Have to scroll through pictures manually (i.e. go "Back" out of each one) Things dont seem to have progressed as far as I would have imagined by now! |
|
Originally Posted by john0213
i 've read quite a few articles about the screen of the panasonic, many people comment that panasonic has a stunning number on spec sheet as it is 16 millions, but comparatively, sharp has a better screen quality even with only 262k because they use their own technology call something lcd silicon somethign, lol i totally forgot. Again, on that specific articles, it says because that specific technology, it makes the sharp screen works different than a normal 262k screen. people end up comparing the two side by side and it has came up that sharp has better screen because of that single technology. So yes, sharp, as screen wise will definitely be the best with no doubt, but i would way panasonic will be the only competitor that come close to sharp, other being not worth to mention at all.
|









|
Originally Posted by jowlie
Thankyou Box- Very helpful -could you show some photogtraphs on the screen an a photo of the thumbnail menu? - I just have a few more questions though.
![]() Thanks for everyones advice so far, all has been heeded & appreciated! *Can all data pictures/video/music be transferred from another phone and vice-versa (including nokia etc)? *Are Themes fully compatible with ALL firmware versions? *What is the battery life like with heavy mp3 use? *Are the flashing lights on the outside useful and noticable? *What are the photo/video editing tools like? *Can you add words to the dictionary *Can you extract a number from a message & "ADD" it to a contact - one very annoying glitch with the gx20 |
jkjk
thx
|
Originally Posted by jowlie
but can you add it to an existing contact
|
|
Originally Posted by Box215
|







|
Originally Posted by azn_boi_128
nice nice hahha maybe i should post mine... its euro w/ a japanese mix
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by jowlie
Argh, u still cant scroll though large size- what a let down!!
So my mates with SE & Nokias wont be able 2 bluetooth pics/vids either!? |
|
Originally Posted by Timsta
well they can bt you pidcs and videos.. the videos have to be compatible tho. pics should be fine. unless they are huge.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser