|
Originally Posted by THETRUTH#34
I have the 6682 had the w600, and will be returning my 6682 for the w600 again,the w600 aside from expandable memory is just better overall in my opinion, if u dont mind expandable memory, my 6682 is good but short battery life, reboots alot,gaming is slow and stagnant, music player is slow and very low next to the w600, just think the w600 does everything better as a phone.
|
|
Originally Posted by roxatBASEketbal
I beg to differ.....
I had 5 razrs, and 2 w600i's. They all messed up on me. I got a 6682 and have had it for a while. Hasn't messed up on me once. Sure the UI might be slow, but it is faster than the RAZR. The 6682 has more memory than the w600i, not built in but you can get an expansion card of up to 1 gig. It is an awesome phone, and the size does not bother me. And this is going from a RAZR. |
|
Originally Posted by roxatBASEketbal
The battery life on the w600i is horrible compared to the 6682. I used both of the phones the same, constantly using the music player and text messeges and camera, and my nokia lasted me around 3-5 days, while the w600i lasted me about 2 days Max. The signal on the nokia is better than the SE. But I have one question, it says you have had both models as well as I, but it says you returned the w600i. Can you please tell me if this is such a great phone why you returned it? Not being the police or anythnig but just curious.
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser