|
Originally Posted by EChid
The number of megapixels has nothing to do with the quality of the picture. SE still has the best camera. The quality of pic has not been met by any other brand yet. The combination of autofocus, excellent quality and good, well thought out camera software make the SE a better deal.
|
|
Originally Posted by aaf evo
i wouldnt say SE is the best camera... i have the best sony ericsson camera phone out to date... the k800i, dont get me wrong... its got an amazing camera.. the xenon flash... everything all together makes it really good, but the Sharp 903/904 take better quality pictures. They dont have the xenon flash though, and they also have a lot of firmware bugs... oh and another also... they're HUGE!!! But comparing SE or Samsung... definately go SE for a camera phone... k800i all the way
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by hellspar3
Doesn't the d900 have a 3mp camera and autofocus? Unless the w810's 2mp is unusually superior, a 3mp camera would take better pictures.
|
|
Originally Posted by aaf evo
i wouldnt say SE is the best camera... i have the best sony ericsson camera phone out to date... the k800i, dont get me wrong... its got an amazing camera.. the xenon flash... everything all together makes it really good, but the Sharp 903/904 take better quality pictures. They dont have the xenon flash though, and they also have a lot of firmware bugs... oh and another also... they're HUGE!!! But comparing SE or Samsung... definately go SE for a camera phone... k800i all the way
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by pountus
I used to have a T68i back in the day and it was a horrible phone in terms of lag time. It would take for ever to switch from one app to another. I havent had a SE phone since, has the quality gotten any better?
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser