Google
 
Web www.howardforums.com
Pages: 1

d807 or the cu500

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: cr2250

Title says it all.



Posted by: s2kvietboi

I pick 807 if the whole " 3G " thing doent matter to you



Posted by: KlamshellKing

it depends. are you in a 3g area, does it matter to you? if not get which ever form factor you like better



Posted by: cr2250

no 3g in my area. Well how big is this phone compared to the cu500



Posted by: KlamshellKing

here: http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/co...D=897&id%5B%5D=

i also included the w600i and the nokia 6126... these models are all comparable... all are good solid phones too, or so i here



Posted by: xbmods

the d807 is almost exactly the same size as the razr when the slider is closed i went and looked at one today because i'm seriously thinking about getting one



Posted by: tuolumne

D807 is much more slim, and has a larger 2.2" 262K display.

Personal preference?

I think the Samsung is a much more stylish phone...



Posted by: walkguru

i like the cu500.



Posted by: JR1

I vote for the CU500 as well. I just ordered one!



Posted by: cr2250

O wow i was really hoping the d807 beat the cu500 but i guess most ppl want the 3g stuff. I dont use it since it costs a lot. How much does it costs ne ways? Or like something like aim.



Posted by: tuolumne

People are getting all hot and heavy over the LG CU500 simply because it is the first consumer HSDPA device available in the United States.

Once a Motorola or Nokia 3G device drops, the poor old LG will be left in the dust.

To the average consumer, it doesn't really matter. The Motorola V3i will outsell this LG...that is a given. Slim stylish phones like the V3i/D807 are simply more attractive to more customers than the LG. Why?

It's all about design...



Posted by: ikoolguy

yeah true it's all about designs
i heard the LG is big and not very stylish
and i won't need the 3g or the internet
when i saw the d807 up close i felt in love with it
i was suprise how slim it was for a slider
it has all the features i want
but downside of it is the volume
although i haven't test it out for myself i am still going to get the d807
d807 all the way!



Posted by: cr2250

What is HSDPA ne ways? Yea thats what i thought, since the cu500 is new. I never really like LG products.



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuolumne
People are getting all hot and heavy over the LG CU500 simply because it is the first consumer HSDPA device available in the United States.

Once a Motorola or Nokia 3G device drops, the poor old LG will be left in the dust.

To the average consumer, it doesn't really matter. The Motorola V3i will outsell this LG...that is a given. Slim stylish phones like the V3i/D807 are simply more attractive to more customers than the LG. Why?

It's all about design...


Why would it be left in the dust? The RAZR is over two year old technology. The Cu500 is very thin, only 4mm thicker than the Razr and 5mm thicker than the Samsung. And it looks good. Have you held one to make your assumptions on? I am betting no.If it's all about design, the LG has them both beat, hands down. I had the Samsung and returned it within two weeks because the reception was horrible. It is thin, but so is the LG which is only 3.7 ounces, the Razr V3i 3.53 ounces and the Samsung is 3.46 ounces. The reception on the LG is excellent and is much better than either of the two above.

It's all about design... indeed.

My wife has a RAZR and my LG is almost as thin, only 4mm separate the two. As far as styling goes, the LG has the Moto beat everyday and on sunday. The device looks unique and it is very thin. The Razr and LG side by side you have to really look closely and you can barely tell that the LG is just a tad thicker. V3i is a piece of garbage. Hmm. a RAZR with i tunes, and GPRS! Wow. Impressive. and it is thin. The LG has HSDPA, and it is thin. Hmm which one. Hard decision. I wouldn't like to be stuck with GPRS with the V3i which looks like everyother Razr out there which everyone in their mother has, literally, for the next two years with old technology while everyone else is making video calls and enjoying all that 3g has to offer. My twelve old neighbor and all her friends has one, which looks exactly like the V3i. Yeah sounds good doesn't it. Moto is not innovative anymore, they just change the color and ask for more money and people buy them. What LG has done is beat them at their own game, made a thin phone with the newest technology. People even mainstream consumers will catch on when 3g is offered on everyphone that Cingular carries, it will happen trust me. And Moto's tactics of changing colors will not work, it is already starting to happen. LG is what Moto used to be, innovative as is Samsung. Moto is money hungrey and don't care about the consumer, they just care about the bottom line, innovation has gone out the window in favor of more profits. Just look at the next RAZR the K1, it only has EDGE, how is that for innovative.



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by cr2250
What is HSDPA ne ways? Yea thats what i thought, since the cu500 is new. I never really like LG products.


If you don't know, you don't need it. Buy a RAZR.



Posted by: KlamshellKing

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthedudeman
If you don't know, you don't need it. Buy a RAZR.


LOL... dont buy a razr, i had a v3i and HATED it. im never in my entire life (im still only 15) and ive got a long way to go, BUT NEVER EVER am i buying another moto, there crap.



Posted by: cr2250

Ughh razrs suck. I hate moto now since i wasted money on there products. I mean there first flip phone lasted me a couple weeks. The one with the battery on the front.



Posted by: KlamshellKing

i cant wait to get a normal phone tommorow. its gonna be my first normal non motorola phone in a while (besides old crappy nokias)



Posted by: tuolumne

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthedudeman
Why would it be left in the dust? The RAZR is over two year old technology. The Cu500 is very thin, only 4mm thicker than the Razr and 5mm thicker than the Samsung. And it looks good. Have you held one to make your assumptions on? I am betting no.If it's all about design, the LG has them both beat, hands down. I had the Samsung and returned it within two weeks because the reception was horrible. It is thin, but so is the LG which is only 3.7 ounces, the Razr V3i 3.53 ounces and the Samsung is 3.46 ounces. The reception on the LG is excellent and is much better than either of the two above.

It's all about design... indeed.

My wife has a RAZR and my LG is almost as thin, only 4mm separate the two. As far as styling goes, the LG has the Moto beat everyday and on sunday. The device looks unique and it is very thin. The Razr and LG side by side you have to really look closely and you can barely tell that the LG is just a tad thicker. V3i is a piece of garbage. Hmm. a RAZR with i tunes, and GPRS! Wow. Impressive. and it is thin. The LG has HSDPA, and it is thin. Hmm which one. Hard decision. I wouldn't like to be stuck with GPRS with the V3i which looks like everyother Razr out there which everyone in their mother has, literally, for the next two years with old technology while everyone else is making video calls and enjoying all that 3g has to offer. My twelve old neighbor and all her friends has one, which looks exactly like the V3i. Yeah sounds good doesn't it. Moto is not innovative anymore, they just change the color and ask for more money and people buy them. What LG has done is beat them at their own game, made a thin phone with the newest technology. People even mainstream consumers will catch on when 3g is offered on everyphone that Cingular carries, it will happen trust me. And Moto's tactics of changing colors will not work, it is already starting to happen. LG is what Moto used to be, innovative as is Samsung. Moto is money hungrey and don't care about the consumer, they just care about the bottom line, innovation has gone out the window in favor of more profits. Just look at the next RAZR the K1, it only has EDGE, how is that for innovative.


That's the thing, the LG is not that slim of a phone. It is not ultra-slim and does not have the same sex appeal of the different colored, color shifting V3i RAZRs.

The only thing that really does matter in this business is making money. On that, Motorola knows what they are doing, no matter how many RAZR-haters there are. LG is posting numbers in the red for comparisons sake...



Posted by: KlamshellKing

honestly here on hofo who cares about numbers, company, or looks... its a forum about phones and there features. and the cu500 destroys the razr in features. if u like looks, numbers and companies this is not the forum for u

oh and yea the lg is .2 inches thicker then the razr, not 4 mm, .2" is like 5 mm, which is a big thickness difference. its the diff between the 8125 and the lg. yea, if u want thin and thats it get the razr if not lg kills it



Posted by: tuolumne

I am not disagreeing with you that the CU500 has the better feature set and package, I am saying that to the average Joe, the RAZR will still most likely be the phone of choice just due to it's design. In that respect, Motorola has done very well for themselves with what so many here perceive as a "second rate" phone.



Posted by: ikoolguy

isn't this topic about d807 or cu500...you guys changed it to Razr vs Cu500 LOL



Posted by: KlamshellKing

um no one cares about this thread anymore so it shouldnt matter. and also its sorta obvious that the lg cu500 should be the phone of choice for many, because so many people are switching from teh 8125 to the lg cu500



Posted by: cr2250

Its like saying a ipod sucks since so many people have it. Thats the reason i didnt buy one but really a ipod is easy to use. Probably one of the easiest ui out there for a mp3. So if many ppl didnt have a razr, i guess it would be cool to have one. I remember when they were going for like 300-400 and only a few ppl had them.



Posted by: PsychoLes

I just returned the D807 and bought the CU500. MAN! Talk about night and day! The CU500 is where its at hands down!



Posted by: xbmods

i have 3 razr mine my wife and my sons the only one that is keeping his is my son because it looks cool he says. i just bought 2 d807 so waht if the volum is a little low as long as i can make a call i'll be happpy.

the razr is a great phone does alot of different things the only bad thing about it is that you can't make or receive calls the reception really sucks



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuolumne
That's the thing, the LG is not that slim of a phone. It is not ultra-slim and does not have the same sex appeal of the different colored, color shifting V3i RAZRs.

Its not slim? Really. Its only 4mm thicker than the RAZR. Do you know how much 4mm is? I put them side by side and I have a hard time seeing which phone is thinner, unless you get out a ruler. Have you ever held the LG in your hand? So how do you know it's not thin until you hold one in your hand.

The only thing that really does matter in this business is making money. On that, Motorola knows what they are doing, no matter how many RAZR-haters there are. LG is posting numbers in the red for comparisons sake...


Really? For whom, not the consumer. So I guess you are cheering on Moto for making money while you buy their products that have two year technology because they make a thin phone, yeah makes sense. Good for you, I guess you like getting ripped off and receiving less for your money. You wouldn't buy a two year old car for new car prices would you? So why should you settle for anything less when buying a phone?



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuolumne
I am not disagreeing with you that the CU500 has the better feature set and package, I am saying that to the average Joe, the RAZR will still most likely be the phone of choice just due to it's design. In that respect, Motorola has done very well for themselves with what so many here perceive as a "second rate" phone.



As far as design goes, the phones are almost the same in thickness. Not alot to even notice. I see what your are saying but the razr thiness is not new anymore, alot of phones are just as thin or thinner. It has nothing special going it.



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by cr2250
Its like saying a ipod sucks since so many people have it. Thats the reason i didnt buy one but really a ipod is easy to use. Probably one of the easiest ui out there for a mp3. So if many ppl didnt have a razr, i guess it would be cool to have one. I remember when they were going for like 300-400 and only a few ppl had them.


You missed the point. It's not about everyone having the same phone. Moto is changing the color of the phone and selling a phone that came out two years ago. Basically ******** on the loyal Moto buyer, as long as the money comes pouring in, the consumer doesn't matter. They don't care if you receive a good product or not, I for one don't like it and wouldn't support them. I don't know how anyone could who is a informed consumer and knows their phones when buying them. As most on HOFO should.



Posted by: cr2250

Well most ppl couldnt purchase a razr since it was high priced. Now today its gotten so cheap that almost everybody has one. Iam sure razrs arent reliable since its so thin and stuff but every I look, I either see a razr or a slvr.



Posted by: cr2250

D807 is great. Got it today.



Posted by: dylanursula

Managed to get the CU500 from a local store at $175 due to my FAN and no contract extention.

Must say that I like the CU500 a lot. Here are some thoughts;
1) Much better volume for both speaker phone and earpiece
2) Faster UI
3) Good feature set.

That being said, I think the D807 is a DAMN good looking phone. The CU500 IMHO simply cannot compete. Its not bulky but its not thinner and its not as sexy IMHO. That bein said the LG feels a better phone by touch and the Samsung is a little slippery

Just my 2cents



Posted by: cr2250

The samsng and the LG are really both different. They all have great features which i dont plan to use but its either slide or flip. I was going to just go buy a c139 since i just want something simple. I hate it when ppl think that when you have a nice phone and they think your like super rich. They always judge you by something nice you have and say "you must be rich".



Posted by: iamthedudeman

Quote:
Originally Posted by kisher12991
honestly here on hofo who cares about numbers, company, or looks... its a forum about phones and there features. and the cu500 destroys the razr in features. if u like looks, numbers and companies this is not the forum for u

oh and yea the lg is .2 inches thicker then the razr, not 4 mm, .2" is like 5 mm, which is a big thickness difference. its the diff between the 8125 and the lg. yea, if u want thin and thats it get the razr if not lg kills it


Okay, 5mm. .2 inches is still less than a quarter of a inch. You call that alot.

Yes it is exactly in the middle of the 8125 and the Razr. The Razr is 14mm the Lg 19mm and the 8125 is 24mm. Ten millimeters difference from the Razr to the 8125, now that is alot. 14mm to 19mm is not alot. The Lg is thin, just not as thin as a Razr. But who cares. The Razr is crap.



Posted by: iamthedudeman

It is a little bit thicker, hardly noticeable. Check it out.

Nice little review with alot of photos for those of you who don't have the phone.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/kire/1...57594202374610/

http://erik.thauvin.net/blog/stories.jsp?id=235



Posted by: CoreyTheGent

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthedudeman
People even mainstream consumers will catch on when 3g is offered on everyphone that Cingular carries, it will happen trust me. And Moto's tactics of changing colors will not work, it is already starting to happen. LG is what Moto used to be, innovative as is Samsung. Moto is money hungrey and don't care about the consumer, they just care about the bottom line, innovation has gone out the window in favor of more profits. Just look at the next RAZR the K1, it only has EDGE, how is that for innovative.
Moto Surprises With 3G MotoRAZR MAXX
7/24/06 | Engadget Mobile



Well, it's not an absolute surprise, we saw this model as an unnamed prototype floating around last month, but Motorola just officially took the wraps off of their new MotoRAZR MAXX, a purtiful followup to the V3x. At a mere 0.6-inches thick, the MAXX shaves a whole 0.2-inches off of the V3x. The new phone also adds EDGE and HSDPA in addition to the already speedy UMTS, making this handset much more likely to show up in the EDGE-friendly USA. Moto has included Bluetooth 2.0+ Enhanced Data Rate, 50MB of internal storage, a microSD slot for expansion and the snazzy glass front and touch sensitive music controls of launch buddy KRZR K1m. The 2.2-inch QVGA display is, of course, always welcome, as are the 2.0 megapixel and VGA cameras the phone has. Also, as a nice embellishment on the lot, the phone's details glow blue when receiving a call. Motorola is planning to release the phone to unknown markets and carriers in this half of 2006, our fingers are duly crossed.

Engadget Mobile

When this gets here, nobody will care about your POS LG.

And I voted for the D807. It's rather snazzy.



Posted by: tuolumne

What a gentlemen



Posted by: CoreyTheGent

I'd been waiting patiently for Monday to arrive before I posted in this thread.



Posted by: kuj

The 3g Moto RAZR Maxx uses the 2100 MHz UMTS frequency, which is for Europe and Asia. It will not work in the U.S. It doesn't even have 850 MhHz.





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser