vB Easy Archive - moto v3i vs. nokia 6131 vs. lg cu500

Pages: 1

moto v3i vs. nokia 6131 vs. lg cu500
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: yasonf

Hi,

I'm trying to decide between these 3 phones.

I have cingular service.

Things I am looking for:
slim design
above average camera
good reception in southern california
bluetooth
mp3 player (optional, but would be nice to have)
clear/ good resolution display

If anyone has any experience with these and can give me their opinions (pros and cons) of which I should get, I would appreciate it.

thanks.

Posted by: yasonf

no one has an opinion?

Posted by: KlamshellKing

this has been discussed before... v3i is trash, if you want 3g cu500 and if oyu dont want 3g then get the 6131

Posted by: yasonf

why is the 6131 better than the V3i?

Posted by: zadosha

^^better screen, better OS, better camera (though their MP rating may be close to the same, there is a difference in pic quality), better mp3 player. iTunes is cool and all, but it sucks in this implementation.

Posted by: recon_zrt

i think that the v3i is kind of cool (non-itunes version of course)
but the 6131 has a great lcd (outer and inner)
but cu500 kicks the v3i and 6131 from here to Uranus (ur-ane-us)

also the cu500 has the cool lil rotating camera (slick)

Posted by: EChid

I would say LG CU500 just because it has superior specs in terms of the 3G. Even though it seems like you might not use 3G now, but in a little while I think there might be more and more use for it...so it might be a hand feature.

Posted by: Cellgirl#1

I'm getting the CU500 as soon as it comes to a Cingular store near me. The Razr is just so played out right now it's not even funny.