While Android tablets have been around for 2 years now, none has really been able to capture consumer’s interest. The Galaxy Tab 10.1 gets a lot of media coverage but it’s usually for the wrong reasons. The Asus Transformer Prime was an anticipated device but it was priced too high to generate much interest outside of early adopters. Really, while people are buying Android tablets, it often feels like the platform has no momentum. It feels like the only reason a regular person would buy an Android tablet is because it’s cheaper than an iPad.
It’s quite different from the phone side where Samsung’s Galaxy line has become a poster child for Android’s success.
What Android really needs is tablet to help it stand out. Android needs a hero device that’s cheap, and has wide appeal, to help give the Android tablet ecosystem a much needed, kick-in-the-pants.
The most interesting thing about the Nexus 7 is that the 8GB model is $199 (the 16GB model is $259 CAN) which includes a $25 credit to the Google Play store. While $199 tablets are nothing new (Blackberry Playbook, Kindle Fire, etc) what makes the Nexus 7 special is its hardware. It’s a substantial step-up. Not only does it ship with a quad-core Nvidia Tegra 3 processor, but it also has a higher resolution 7” 1280x800 IPS display, 1GB of RAM, 4325mAh battery and either 8 or 16GB of storage. Aside from the lack of a rear facing camera, missing microSDHC slot, and maybe an IR blaster, on paper, the Nexus 7 doesn’t make any hardware compromises.
It’s a pure Google device so there’s no third party customizations (for better or worse). Besides that, it’s the first device to ship with Jellybean: Android 4.1.
Did I mention it starts at $199? While it’s still a lot of money, consider than the current tablet poster boy, the new iPad starts at $499 while the iPad 2, $399. Heck, until the Nexus came out a 7” Galaxy Tab Plus still cost $349. The Nexus is quite a bargain.
Pins for a docking station
microUSB slot, headphone jack.
power and volume buttons.
In portrait orientation the Nexus is pretty narrow for a 7” tablet. Just look at the pictures of it next to a Galaxy Tab Plus and Blackberry Playbook.
While the iPad is obviously bigger it is a little bit thinner.
The back feels like leather and has an interesting pattern on it. I wish more manufacturers used leather. While it’s not a chintzy device - it does feel like just they made it solid enough to not feel cheap and no more. It doesn’t feel like a plastic toy but the iPad and Playbook both feel more solid.
The display’s strength is its pixel density. At 216ppi it’s not iPad sharp but to my eye, it’s sharp enough. Jellybean uses pretty small text and it looks great on the Nexus.
Indoors the Nexus’ display looks fine. Viewing angles are decent as are black levels. However, when I compare it with my Playbook the Nexus’s looks dim, washed out and slightly reddish. The Nexus display is a reminder that sometimes there’s more to a screen than its resolution.
Left to right: Galaxy Tab 2.0, Nexus 7
As for the speaker on the back, my wife and I tried watching a video on it before we slept and found it wasn’t loud enough. If you’re going to watch videos on it use headphones.
Software:
From a UI perspective Jellybean looks quite similar to Ice Cream Sandwich. While I haven’t tried any 7” ICS tablets I do own a ICS powered Motorola Xoom. I hate how on the Xoom, the apps button is in the top right corner. The Nexus feels more like a giant phone. The apps button is located in the center at the bottom of the home screens where it should be.
For some reason the home screen doesn’t support landscape mode. While I personally never use landscape mode on tablets (unless I’m gaming) a tablet needs this in case you’re using it with a physical keyboard.
Other than that, to me the most dramatic thing is that the menu animations and transitions are much smoother on the Nexus. Otherwise it feels like a slightly more refined version of Ice Cream Sandwich.
Note that the Nexus does not support Adobe Flash. If you visit a lot of Flash enabled websites you may have to get creative.
As far as apps go, the main new feature is Google Now. Google Now is kind of a personal assistant. It looks at where you go plus it checks out your calendar and presents relevant information based on this. For example, I was downtown the other day, when I looked at my notification area it told me how long it would take for me to get home (including traffic) if I left right then plus the weather downtown. It also has support for public transit, your next appointment, travel information like translations, sports information, etc. It’s very cool but to be honest, while Google now is really cool it’s more suited for a phone. Pretty much everyone carries a phone around with them all the time. The same can’t be said about a WiFi only tablet.
Generally speaking, I find that, out-of-the-box pure Google devices can sometimes leave me wanting when it comes to DLNA support, video codec support, built-in camera functions, social media integration, chat plus some of the built-in utilities are kind of basic.
The idea with a pure Google device is that you go out and get your own apps. Since the Nexus 7 doesn’t have a rear-facing camera there is no camera app. Unlike the Tegra 2 the quad-core Tegra 3 processor is powerful enough to decode HD video files so no special video player is needed (I used Dice Player and MX Player). Since 3rd party video players work fine you can use them with DLNA players from Google Play (like MediaHouse). While I do like some customizations you get from OEM’s they’re not essential like they used to be.
A pure Google device also tends to receive more updates. While you usually get one major Android version update, it’s rare to get more then that unless you do it yourself.
Performance:
SunSpider:
Asus Transformer Prime: 1684.4
Apple iPad: 1693.7
Nexus 7: 1705
Motorola Xoom: 2146.7
Samsung Galaxy Note: 2714.3
SunSpider is a benchmark which runs within a browser. The Nexus is right up there with the new iPad and Transformer Prime. While it’s true that the Xoom and Note’s processors are hopelessly outclassed by the Nexus’ it’s interesting to compare since they represent a step up and down size wise.
Vellamo:
Vellamo is another browser test which actually consists of a group of benchmarks.
Motorola Xoom: 977.88
Samsung Galaxy Note: 1366.73
Nexus 7: 1719.52
GL Benchmark:
GL Benchmark is a OpenGL test. I didn’t include results from the Asus Transformer Prime because my results for it were with an older version of GL Benchmark.
Egypt Standard:
Motorola Xoom: 1715
Samsung Galaxy Note: 3179
Nexus 7: 5848
Egypt Standard Offscreen
Motorola Xoom: 2317
Samsung Galaxy Note: 3179
Nexus 7: 7097
Basemark:
Basemark is another OpenGL 3D benchmark. In the past I’ve found that the Tegra 3 doesn’t do as well as it should in Basemark and the Nexus is no different. It barely outscores the Note’s Adreno 220 GPU.
Motorola Xoom: 4.42
Nexus 7: 17.84
Samsung Galaxy Note: 16.56
As far as performance benchmarks go the Nexus does really well and is right up there with the class leaders.
Battery Life:
To test battery life I used AnTuTu battery tester along with my personal battery benchmark. For my personal benchmark I charged the battery, set the brightness to max, disabled WiFi and played a video using the built-in video player until the unit shut off.
Battery life (minutes):
Nexus 7: 442
Samsung Galaxy Note: 350
Motorola Xoom: 301
AnTuTu tester:
Motorola Xoom: 801
Samsung Galaxy Note: 577
Nexus 7: 448
While the Nexus aces my video playback test it didn’t do so well in AnTuTu. My personal experience is that the Nexus needs to be charged every night which is kind of disappointing for a tablet.
Conclusion:
So you’re probably wondering if you should run out and buy a Nexus 7. It’s not a perfect device - it could have a better screen and could be more solid. However, its price more than makes up for these deficiencies.
Next is the 8 or 16GB question. I think the decision boils down to whether you plan on storing video files on the it. I don’t think the Nexus makes a good music player and there’s no rear facing camera so you probably won’t be taking many pictures. Since the Nexus lacks a memory card slot I think that makes it a poor choice as a video player anyways. So ,while I got the 16GB model I think most people will be fine with just the 8GB.
When it comes to tablets I see 10” tablets as being portable while 7” tablets are mobile. A 10” is portable in that I use it around the house but I’m not usually moving when I use it. A 7” is mobile because I can fit it in some of my pockets so I can usually take it out of the house and use it while I’m walking around.
Still, since the Nexus 7 is WiFi only, I have to work to get it connected when I’m out. None of my phones has enough battery life that I’d want to leave their mobile hotspot feature on all the time while I’m out and I don’t want to carry a portable hotspot around. This limits its mobility.
Of course, If I’m creating content, a 10” device’s larger display is probably more appropriate. To me a 7” tablet in its element when being used as an e-reader, for watching videos, surfing the web and gaming. When I reviewed the original Galaxy Tab I had the same thoughts. Back then, Android phones maxed out at around 4” (Galaxy S, HTC Desire, etc) so the size difference between them and a 7” tablet was noticeable. Since then, we now have screen sizes bigger than 4” including the 5.3” Galaxy Note. The Note is also really good as an e-reader, watching videos, you get the idea. More choices are great but it also muddies the waters. If you already have an Android phone with a big screen, you may find that the trade off between screen size and portability doesn’t make sense.
It’s not that the Nexus isn’t substantially bigger, it’s just that the Note is much bigger than a 4” phone yet it’s still small enough to go anywhere.
The Nexus 7’s lack of a rear-facing camera may limit its usefulness as a business tool though, as a consumer, I won’t miss it since most of my phones do a good job in this regard.
It’s also a very disruptive device. Based on its specifications and what everyone else is charging Asus/Google could have asked $349 or $399 for the 16GB version. Of course, at that price they probably wouldn’t have sold that many just like other Android tablets. It’s going to be hard for other companies to charge much more for their tablets.
In the 7” range, besides LTE, a rear facing camera, more storage and perhaps, maybe a HDMI port what else can manufacturers put in their tablet to justify charging more than the Nexus 7? LTE normally adds about $130 to the price (like on the iPads), you might be able to charge another $50 for another 16GB of storage, I’d argue that a rear facing camera doesn’t add any use to a tablet and I don’t think most people will pay anything for an HDMI port. Of course, if you were to add all these features you’d end up with an expensive tablet that no one will buy.
On the 10” side you can charge about $75 more for a higher res screen along with all the other features I mentioned but you run into the same problem - you end up with an expensive tablet that no one wants to buy.
About 6 months ago I thought to myself that no one should buy an Android tablet unless it costs less than $299. Looks like someone read my mind.
They need to be cheaper than a phone since a) you probably won’t carry it everywhere, b) they probably won’t be subsidized by a carrier. But, while they need to be cheaper they need to have beefy enough specs to run anything you can throw at it. Last year’s Tegra 2 tablets just didn’t cut it.
To me, the Nexus 7 really represents where tablets need to be.
All in all, the tablet market just got a lot more interesting. If I can split the history of tablets into chapters we just entered a new one. The first chapter would have devices like the Apple Newton, Palm Pilot, that sort of thing. The next chapter would be Windows Tablets followed by the iPad. Flipping the page would be Android/Web OS/Playbook tablets and now we have affordable, powerful tablets like the Google Nexus 7.
Pros:
Affordable
Fast
Interesting Back
Battery life
Sharp screen
Cons:
Quiet speaker
Storage not expandable
Screen not bright enough
Battery life
Sponsored By
Recent Forum Posts
Message