Yes price was the issue. It was cheaper. I don't see why you hate it. I mean I absolutely love it. It is the best phone I have had. What exactly do you hate about it??Originally Posted by serpentor
-zack![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I loved the Q. Only 2 reasons I went to the Q9c was for GPS (which I use all the time) and HTML e-mail. If they did that with the Q, I would have happily stayed with it; if it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Yes price was the issue. It was cheaper. I don't see why you hate it. I mean I absolutely love it. It is the best phone I have had. What exactly do you hate about it??Originally Posted by serpentor
-zack![]()
I agree with you guys... my Q has been great. It really turned me on to having Windows Mobile on a phone. I love the thin form factor too so I can always put it in my jeans pocket.
I'd like a Q9c because it looks a little nicer, has GPS, and windows mobile.
My next phone will probably be the HTC Touch Diamond, but I have a feeling im going to be missing the keyboard....
I was perfectly happy with my Q, I only got a Q9c because of the internal GPS. The two phones aren't very different; I think the Q9c is a bit more stable/manages memory better and crashes less, but not by much.
After I got the Q9c, I discovered that I like its keys a lot better too.
---
Sprint (family plan): Epic (me)|iPhone 5 (spouse)|iPhone 4S (kid1)|SGS II/E4G Touch (kid2)|LG Optimus S (backup line)
---
ATTM (work): Nokia 6350
---
ATTM PayGo: Nokia N95-3
---
Bookmarks