Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Coverage in S.W. Calgary Improved Yet? Light Red Vs. Dark Red on the Coverage Maps?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0

    Coverage in S.W. Calgary Improved Yet? Light Red Vs. Dark Red on the Coverage Maps?

    I am wondering if the coverage has improved in the far S.W. ( end of Bow trail/Wentworth ) yet? It was very spotty a couple of months ago.
    I see on the Wind coverage maps now that there is a red/covered area in two tones of Red in Calgary? Is the darker red supposed to mean something?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    533
    Phone
    Android Dev Phone 2
    Carrier
    Wind
    Feedback Score
    0
    I only see red (Wind Home) and yellow/orange (future coverage). Are you talking about the home zone isn't surrounded by future coverage and the border is red?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    155
    Phones
    8830 WE
    8330
    8703E -Retired
    Carrier
    Telus
    Feedback Score
    0

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,457
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think they have abandoned calgary for the time being. They can roll out in three new cities but they cant put up few more towers in calgary.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    crazy. How can they expect to retain customers like that in Calgary.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    155
    Phones
    8830 WE
    8330
    8703E -Retired
    Carrier
    Telus
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by a1jatt
    I think they have abandoned calgary for the time being. They can roll out in three new cities but they cant put up few more towers in calgary.
    I don't think this is true. I saw them doing some work at the library tower at the U of C.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    5,057
    Phone
    LG Nexus 4
    Carriers
    T-Mobile
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm sure they're still doing work. They don't necessarily have to put up new towers (or antennas) to increase coverage either.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    416
    Posts
    10,213
    Phones
    Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-5660M, Nokia N95-4, Sony Ericsson Z/W710i, Z520a, Z600, T200, T310, T237
    Ericsson T39mc, T39m, T28w, T18z, CF388
    *Prototype TU2* Ericsson R520m Copper Edition (Made: 00W43)
    Carrier
    7-11 SpeakOut Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markhsa
    crazy. How can they expect to retain customers like that in Calgary.
    They don't plan to with the lack of population

    But serious though, they are still working on the network there. This coming from someone I know that's building/tweaking the actual network in Calgary.
    Ericsson / Sony Ericsson, the choice of:
    • Charlie's Angels
    • Lara Croft
    • James Bond




  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    387
    Phones
    Samsaung Galaxy Nexus (WIND - HMP)
    T-Mobile G1 (Retired - WIND)
    SE W610i (PO) (Retired - Fido)
    Carriers
    WIND (2010-????)
    Feedback Score
    0
    Admittedly, WIND isn't good at updating their maps to show these "updates" or "reconfigurations" but then, would you really want them to effectively "tweeting" each and every change? Then people would complain they are wasting time on getting the message out for each update as opposed to focusing on what they are doing.

    I know it's repetitive but maybe WIND isn't for some people right now. That's the beauty of no contract. I mean, I personally held out and I am just now switching to WIND. It is what it is.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    5,057
    Phone
    LG Nexus 4
    Carriers
    T-Mobile
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by likebutta
    Admittedly, WIND isn't good at updating their maps to show these "updates" or "reconfigurations" but then, would you really want them to effectively "tweeting" each and every change? Then people would complain they are wasting time on getting the message out for each update as opposed to focusing on what they are doing.

    I know it's repetitive but maybe WIND isn't for some people right now. That's the beauty of no contract. I mean, I personally held out and I am just now switching to WIND. It is what it is.

    I'm not so sure about it being a waste of time. Given the location of all their towers, the orientation, position, power levels, etc. (i.e., stuff they should all have in a database), you just need to run it all through an algorithm to generate an estimated coverage map.

    I can't imagine they're doing it any other way right now, so I don't think it would be much work for them to update it more regularly.

Bookmarks