Post your Data Speed Here...

**flomar** · 01-18-2012, 02:30 PM

Originally Posted by grafikal

Attachment 77758

Parkview area of Edmonton.

You should be happy with your speed test, just checked mine and that's why i have issues to listen to internet radio.My test at Scarborough Lawrence and Midland:
ping 745ms,
download 15.51kb/s
upload 3.19kb/s

**beachlover333** · 01-21-2012, 09:16 AM

Ouch, weekends really bad....

**beachlover333** · 01-23-2012, 06:17 AM

Weekday morning, a little better....

**icemasta** · 02-26-2012, 09:38 AM

Very impressed by Mobi data lately.
Did a couple speedtests in our house using my brothers phone (havent necessarily done any since I left last year), and my I don't get anything lower than 2Mb down and 0.4Mb up. Obviously I'd like to try it out in more places but so far very impressed.

**taliosfalcon** · 03-02-2012, 04:12 PM

here's what i get at 3-pmish in downtown edmonton now

Name: 147864866.png
Views: 535
Size: 22.8 KB

about 10x higher than it was a month ago sadly, but still so slow i think i'm going to have to switch carriers =/

**endlessdayz** · 03-05-2012, 02:17 PM

Name: 2012-02-11-23-31-26.png
Views: 519
Size: 45.1 KB

Tuesday Morning. Data speeds are pretty consitant around this speed.

Vancouver, BC

**BruceBanner** · 03-15-2012, 05:44 PM

Surrey today -
352ms ping
1940kbps down
247kbps up

- BUT - i'm having a helluv a time with the FACEBOOK, YOUTUBE, DOLPHIN BROWER, and TED.COM apps...

Anyone else having problems with data intensive applications?

**sandhu** · 03-26-2012, 12:07 AM

ping 223ms

down 112.6 kb/s
up 118.8kb/s

in surrey

Best I have gotten was almost 300 kb/s down 250 kb/s up

**Richard Lee** · 03-26-2012, 07:38 AM

BruceBanner and sandu, where in surrey and at about what time did you take those readings?

Would you please do me a favor: take reading at 108 Ave and either 134, 135 or Gateway Drive in sight of the Gateway Skytrain station? I'm relocating from Toronto.

**BruceBanner** · 03-27-2012, 11:11 AM

138 and 104 during business hours... There is a dead spot 108 & 142

**Richard Lee** · 03-27-2012, 11:32 AM

That's interesting...there's suppose to be a tower at 134 and 104, less than a km away from where you took the reading. So there it's not reception as much as congestion during the day.Kinda makes sense since that's Surrey city center (at least that's my impression the few times I've been to Surrey). Since it's also the tower closest to the particular area of my interest up the street, one can assume similar if not worse data speed.

The deadspot you mention happens to be the "dead" center of a triangle of formed by 3 towers located at 104/134, 104/152 and just across the river at the Port Mann bridge. That is, maximum distance between towers that are already among the farthest apart according to the tower map where coverage circles emanating from those towers do not intersect (or if they do, it's at the very fringe coverage of all 3), and is therefore definately explained by reception problem.

**BruceBanner** · 03-27-2012, 12:04 PM

Test Date: Mar 27, 2012 9:11:26 am
Connection Type: Umts
Server: Burnaby, BC
Download: 2045 kbps
Upload: 302 kbps
Ping: 350 ms

External IP: 207.245.236.57
Internal IP: 10.103.75.68

Sent from an Android Superphone.

**wilsonlam97** · 04-16-2012, 09:00 PM

Speeds are so horrible here at Finch & Neilson that it takes 3 minutes to load a webpage and it's almost impossible to connect to the network. Stupid abusers.