Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Shrinking LTE?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,780
    Phones
    Galaxy Nexus
    Galaxy Nexus
    Motorola Droid 2
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0

    Shrinking LTE?

    Hey all. Since the second round of Big Red's LTE rollout, I have been mapping the changes in coverage to see how the network is progressing. Over the past few months, I have noticed LTE coverage, while on a whole expanding rapidly, is shrinking in many places. I am wondering if the network is truly shrinking or if this is just a map bug. I will post some examples below. If you live in any of these places and can shed some light on whether or not the reported coverage is true or not, that would be great. I am just trying to see if Verizon is deactivating some sites, and then we can speculate as to why. Thanks!

    First up is my stomping grounds: Louisville and Lexington, KY (November vs. today):

    Name:  ky1.JPG
Views: 923
Size:  11.3 KB Name:  ky2.JPG
Views: 918
Size:  11.4 KB

    I can tell you that all of the coverage that appears to be lost in Lexington still exists today.


    Jonesboro, Arkansas (November vs. today):
    Name:  ark1nov.JPG
Views: 930
Size:  8.8 KB Name:  ar2.JPG
Views: 919
Size:  8.9 KB


    El Paso, TX (September vs. today):
    Name:  elpaso1sep.JPG
Views: 911
Size:  12.1 KB Name:  elpaso2.JPG
Views: 911
Size:  11.0 KB


    Jackson, Dyersburg and Martin, Tennessee (November vs. today):
    Name:  tn1.JPG
Views: 910
Size:  12.0 KB Name:  tn2.JPG
Views: 911
Size:  11.8 KB



    Boise, Idaho (August vs. today):
    Name:  id1aug.JPG
Views: 913
Size:  11.4 KB Name:  id2.JPG
Views: 913
Size:  10.6 KB



    Winston-Salem & Raleigh area, North Carolina (November vs. today):
    Name:  nc1nov.JPG
Views: 924
Size:  11.9 KB Name:  nc2.JPG
Views: 922
Size:  11.9 KB



    Albequrque, New Mexico (October vs. today):
    Name:  alb1oct.JPG
Views: 845
Size:  12.3 KB Name:  alb2.JPG
Views: 852
Size:  12.4 KB


    Some of these may be chalked up to Verizon adjusting their expectations of extended LTE, but for others like El Paso, Boise and the cities in NC, it appears Verizon has deactivated entire cell sites for whatever reason. These are just some of the examples I have noticed. What gives? Any ideas? Any real-world change in coverage?


    Verizon Wireless: America's fastest, largest and most reliable mobile broadband network.

    I'm just a twenty-something year old college graduate speaking geek on HoFo!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,242
    Phone
    iPhone5 | iPhone4 | Nexus S
    Carrier
    Verizon|AT&T|Sprint
    Feedback Score
    0
    It's all those black, horn-rimmed glasses guys going around testing the network and reporting back on real-world coverage versus theoretical coverage based on propagation simulations with DTED terrain data. Nice to see they're still heavily testing the network.
    iPhone

    iPad 4G

    It just keeps getting better...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,703
    Phones
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    Carrier
    Verizon, soon to be AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    Verizon one put up a huge LTE coverage area for Bay City Michigan that did not exist. They took that down in the next update, too.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Saint Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    268
    Phone
    Galaxy Nexus
    Carrier
    MegaFon (RU)
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankees368 View Post
    Verizon one put up a huge LTE coverage area for Bay City Michigan that did not exist. They took that down in the next update, too.
    I was just about to mention this. Huge was an understatement. Mt. Pleasant was also included, then removed, and only just recently received official coverage.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    327
    Phone
    iPhone, Epic, Moto Series, (many)
    Carriers
    Verizon
    PagePlus
    Feedback Score
    0
    Just tangentially related to your post, since the maps are often woefully inaccurate anyway.

    LTE uses CDMA for its air interface (as does UMTS). CDMA coverage does shrink (it "breathes") depending on use. i.e. if you have only one user, they can be further away. If you have multiple simultaneous users, then the users closest to the tower win. This is the reason fringe CDMA areas are fine during non-peak usage times, but unusable during peak times.

    GSM typically uses TDMA for its air interface (or FDMA), but either way, coverage area doesn't change with usage. It's less spectrally efficient so the TDMA air interface didn't win.
    ---
    http://cell.uoregon.edu
    Eugene, OR -- Pacific Northwest

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Chester, IL
    Posts
    3,559
    Phone
    iPhone 4 32GB CDMA; Galaxy Nexus
    Carrier
    Verizon
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dalbrich View Post
    Just tangentially related to your post, since the maps are often woefully inaccurate anyway.

    LTE uses CDMA for its air interface (as does UMTS). CDMA coverage does shrink (it "breathes") depending on use. i.e. if you have only one user, they can be further away. If you have multiple simultaneous users, then the users closest to the tower win. This is the reason fringe CDMA areas are fine during non-peak usage times, but unusable during peak times.

    GSM typically uses TDMA for its air interface (or FDMA), but either way, coverage area doesn't change with usage. It's less spectrally efficient so the TDMA air interface didn't win.
    LTE uses OFMDA instead of CDMA on the downstream and SC-FDMA on the upstream.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP_Long_Term_Evolution

    ​Fiber backhaul for Verizon in Southern Illinois in 2013 - about time.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    327
    Phone
    iPhone, Epic, Moto Series, (many)
    Carriers
    Verizon
    PagePlus
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fraydog View Post
    LTE uses OFMDA instead of CDMA on the downstream and SC-FDMA on the upstream.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP_Long_Term_Evolution
    Sorry for the mis-information on my part. I presumed they continued with the WCDMA used for UMTS.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    How do you know what towers were live and which weren't? Lucky guessing? You're a network engineer? Some magical app? I'm a cell tower nerd (wtf?) and this really peaks my interest!(:

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,780
    Phones
    Galaxy Nexus
    Galaxy Nexus
    Motorola Droid 2
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyler Cameron View Post
    How do you know what towers were live and which weren't? Lucky guessing? You're a network engineer? Some magical app? I'm a cell tower nerd (wtf?) and this really peaks my interest!(:
    Nah, I just read the dB numbers for LTE under certain towers. That combined with 60+mbps speeds tells me there are active towers not depicted in the maps.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Trocks797 View Post
    Nah, I just read the dB numbers for LTE under certain towers. That combined with 60+mbps speeds tells me there are active towers not depicted in the maps.
    I suspect here in Virginia Beach, Verizon isn't running the LTE towers at nearly as much power as they (legally) could because the range sucks.

    On my way home from school, at this turn for the road (and the entrance to the neighborhood being about... 300 feet from that turn). At the stoplight before the turn, I was pulling 4-6mbps down and 2-8mbps up. This was on -105dBm

    Now we make that turn and speeds automatically get worse. No more than 1-3mbps down/0.5-3mbps up. You can easily see the difference in the results tab in the speedtest app (if you want a screenshot lol, doubt you care that much)

    and in my house.. no more than 1000 feet from the neighborhood entrance, 1.65mbps down/0.54mbps up. Wtf? Why is such a small difference... not only in signal but distance as well having such a massive affect on speeds?

    Now recently, I've been noticing better signal all around. Much more green in my battery stats lol. But the speeds are no better. What does this mean? And yesterday just before the turn I was talking about, I pulled a (very strange) 2mbps down/13mbps up. The network is EXTREMELY wonky here and always has been. I wish I just knew why lol.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    272
    Phones
    Samsung Alias II
    LG Spectrum
    Carrier
    Verizon
    Feedback Score
    0
    What kind of obstructions/reflective surfaces are there in the affected area? Do you have an AM radio?
    If so, turn it on and tune it to the lowest frequency that doesn't have a station. What kind of noise do you hear? Does it vary by direction? Multipath degrades OFDMA performance.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by carcarx View Post
    What kind of obstructions/reflective surfaces are there in the affected area? Do you have an AM radio?
    If so, turn it on and tune it to the lowest frequency that doesn't have a station. What kind of noise do you hear? Does it vary by direction? Multipath degrades OFDMA performance.
    Name:  271940_195689973822957_100001458670467_550239_2862897_o.jpg
Views: 303
Size:  158.5 KB
    This is in my neighbor's backyard. Sorry about it being dark, I took it a long time ago during a storm (duh) and don't have another picture of it on me. I'm in school right now haha. I asked my papa what kind of antennas they are and he said he thinks they're for CB radio. But he's no radio engineer/expert

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    ^ Would those antennas have any affect on OFDMA performance?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    706
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyler Cameron View Post
    ^ Would those antennas have any affect on OFDMA performance?
    They shouldn't, its not really as much about the technology as it is about the frequency. Those antenna's look like HAM radio or TV antenna's and shouldn't have any effect on LTE.

    What Verizon does during an LTE upgrade is replace or add one panel per sector of the cell site, it could be the way they placed the LTE panel, you could be on the edge of the sector beam, but are able to pick up CDMA/EV because the antenna covers a wider degree.

    It also could be they don't have LTE on every site yet. What phone do you have? That plays a big role in the service you receive as well.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    13
    Carrier
    Verizon Wireless
    Feedback Score
    0
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus.
    So what you're saying is when they put LTE on a tower, they don't put antennas all around?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Shrinking TDMA Coverage
    By TZ617 in forum AT&T
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-07-2003, 09:06 AM
  2. Cellular-News: Mexican network reports shrinking subscriber base
    By eakenn in forum General Mobile Questions and Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2003, 07:35 AM
  3. Do You know how to shrink Clothes?
    By Backlash- in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-18-2002, 08:02 PM
  4. The Incredible Shrinking Warranty
    By joestedman in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-30-2002, 07:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks