Interesting scenario,can you send me some info on this meeting. I see also you just joined this blog. Interesting how a company has not sent notice to all of it's customers for thepast 3 months that it intentionally pre-installed tracking software, collected billions of data on it's users, but would spend the time to go to a sorority meeting. Really like to see details of thismeeting, including name of rep, office, title, and any material being provided by motorlafor review.
No I do not have my website up this second. I decided this year I would redo the entire site that I have used in the past so that it now is innovative and changes the way info is provided to those interested in internet privacy law for computers and mobile phones.
Houston, eh! I worked from 1979-86 in houston and grad from south texas law in 1986. Been in dallas with my own practice since 1988. houston is great place. What school you at and interesting that your sorority would have a meeting on this area.
Hopefully motorola, their local reps, and more than likely their attys are viewing websites for info,such as this site, so in addition to informing you of my involvement/experince in this area. let me also help them! So here are 2 of my cases I filed last month on HTC and samsung, including an email form the court on one of the cases:
Lisa Clark et al v. Carrier IQ Inc et al :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com › ... › California Central District Court › Other › OtherCached
Dec 8, 2011 – California Central District Court - Other - Other - Lisa Clark et al v. ... December 8, 2011, 1, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Carrier IQ Inc, Samsung ... Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC ...
ECF-CAND@cand.uscourts.gov to efiling
show details 12/8/11
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity
NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text.
Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not.
If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document.
If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .
See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
The following transaction was received from entered on 12/8/2011 3:42 PM PST and filed on 12/6/2011
Case Name: Olivares et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
Document Number:3(No document attached)
ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2012. Case Management Conference set for 3/6/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
5:11-cv-06151-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Brian R Strange     firstname.lastname@example.org
Joseph H Malley     email@example.com
5:11-cv-06151-HRL Please see General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
So houston 2012, sorry for having my website down, but most websites are bellsand whistles anyway, ie looknice but you really just need to pull up court records on attorneys to see theyactually do file suits and the level of the suits. Most attys may file one suit per year in a state court, while all my cases are federal and we file about one a month, and all are involving privacylaw. I don't dabble in this area. Thisis all I do now. So here's some blog/stories about my recent cases:
1)"Malley's name should bring the fear of god to many an IT outfit."
2) Since 2006 I was one of thefirst involved in DPPA, or privacy violation of the driver privacy protection act where states sell motor vehicle records to companies, most under the false pretense of a legal right. Basically these companies buy the records for marketing.
IF YOU OR YOUR SOROITY MEMEMEBRS were texas residents then I represented you in the cases filed against 137 companies that were buying 20 million recordsevery 2 weeks.
So now i put otgether about 40 lawyersfrom multiple state, about 8 and we arefiling these cases. It looks like all will end up at the US SUPREME CT next year. Here's arecent case from missouri:
No. 10–3818. - COOK v. ACS STATE LOCAL SOLUTIONS INC - US ... caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th.../1588620.html?.
Dec 15, 2011 –, argued, Dallas, TX, (Timothy H. Bosler, ... Under Missouri law and the federal regulatory scheme of the DPPA, the ...
3) Friday, September 16, 2011, 6:01 PM
KISSmetrics, Hulu Hit With Privacy Suit
by Wendy Davis, Friday, September 16, 2011, 6:01 PM
MediaPost Publications KISSmetrics, Hulu Hit With Privacy ...Analytics company KISSmetricsand Web video site Hulu.com have been hit with another privacy lawsuit over their alleged use of "supercookies" to track people. The ..http://www.mediapost.com/publication...s.showArticle&... - Cached
4) MediaPost Publications OpenFeint Sued For Misappropriating ...
OpenFeint Sued For Misappropriating Mobile Gamers' Data - 06/24/2011
http://www.mediapost.com/publication...s.showArticle&... - Cached
The complaint included an attorney's name I have seen before: Joseph Malley of Dallas. Malley, often referred to as a "Privacy Crusader,"
was involved with class-action suits against Adzilla, NebuAd,
Quantcast ("zombie cookies"), Ringleader, and Facebook. In 2010,
Facebook settled the suit for $9.5 million.
For consumers who have privacy concerns, you want an attorney that is
experienced with online privacy issues and technologies. Malley is the
guy you want on your side.
NebuAd Settles Lawsuit Over Behavioral Targeting Tests .....August 16, 2011
Specific Media Settles Flash Cookie Suit, Promises Never To Use
Them......August 22, 2011
7) AOL, Brightcove & ScanScout Online Tracking Class Action Lawsuit. 24,
8) ZOMBIE COOKIES, a term I coined: "Web measurement company Quantcast and widget maker Clearspring have agreed to settle two class action lawsuits alleging they violated people’s online privacy by using Flash cookies to track their information. The majority of the $2.4 million settlement – which still awaits court approval – will go toward privacy organizations."
So houston 2012, thanks for the repsonse. Congratsto you that you would have such a meeting, AND IT'S ONLY MOTOROLA USERS? Feel free to pass out the list of phones noted in my posts. Feel free to call me at 1-800-833-0101 to discuss any issue or concern. I'm in dallas, so youcan call 9-4:30
So to motorola, reps, and their counsel that must be viewing the board, I'M COMING AND HELL'S COMING WITH ME! ( wyatt earp movie!)
Atty Joe Malley