While that's a fair point, here's how I see it.
On the OS front, Android is just too unreliable - it freezes, lags, crashes, uses data without permission, sends personal information in clear text, and so on. BlackBerry OS has the same problem, particularly starting around OS5, except it doesn't send personal info in clear text.
iOS on the software level is reliable, but iPhones aren't, and with the mandatory upgrade cycle/planned obsolescence, you have to get a new one every 2 years. The iPhone 3G and 3GS had a good hardware design (copying Nokia's antenna patents didn't hurt), but the iPhone 4 had reception problems, the 4S has only mitigated them and has battery life problems. Sticking to iOS4 isn't really an option anymore and iOS5 is slow as a dog on the 3GS. One size just doesn't fit all. If Apple had some different designs for the phones so you could avoid one problem by selecting a different model, that might work better (and actually does as so far there hasn't been anything wrong with the iPod touch line), but on a hardware level, it's not reliable as a phone.
That really only leaves Windows Phone. It isn't yet the greatest in all areas, but in the areas that really count, it doesn't suck.
The word 'Pentaband' means '5 Bands', from the Greek word 'pente' meaning '5'. For a phone to be pentaband it has to support 5 bands. If the phone has AWS support, it doesn't automatically mean that it is pentaband. The reason Wind and Mobilicity users like pentaband phones is because the reverse is true. We're not the only ones who like pentaband phones though, so please stop referring to phones that work on Wind and Mobilicity as pentaband. It causes unnecessary cofusion.
Bookmarks