
Originally Posted by
Steve Punter
While it may not seem like it to you, but it's unfair to compare two networks in a single location. Fido/Rogers likely wins at your house because they happen to have a site in closer proximity. At any given random location, there will always be a provider with a closer site.
What probably bugs you the most is that the service SEEMED to be stronger when you first signed up. This was probably the case, but Bell/Telus might have installed a new site in your area and then re-tuned existing sites to cut down on overlap. While putting in a new site USUALLY means better service in the area all around, it also means that in some instances the signal can get weaker when an existing site is de-tuned so that it works more cooperatively with the new site.
CDMA (and therefore HSPA as well) does suffer from a phenomenon called SITE SHRINKAGE, in which the coverage area decreases in size as the number of users goes up. However, this will mostly be evident during the day and NOT in the middle of the night. If your problem is persistent no matter when you try, then the number of users on the site IS NOT a valid explanation.
Another issue that people overlook is foliage. In the winter signals can penetrate residential areas better because the trees are bare. As leaves begin to appear on those trees (especially in older neighborhoods with lots of big trees) the signal is absorbed by them. You didn't say where you were, and so I can't necessarily assume that you don't yet have leaves on the trees in your area (I don't know how much earlier Vancouver gets foliage than Toronto for example).
The trouble with network coverage is that, no matter how good it is overall, it is still a hit-and-miss situation in some areas (especially large residential areas without many apartment buildings and with lots of NIMBYs keeping sites to a minimum).
Bookmarks