|
|
|
|
|
im still gonna
T-Mobile is playing smart. Makes me think they played AT&T for the fools that they are.
PCS HSPA in Las Vegas
*
Coverage will expand to 100 million LTE pops for the first half of 2013, with the second half of 2013 expanding to 200 million POPs covered. Release 10 LTE (2×10, 2×20) will be better performing than all other competitors.
T-Mobile USA. “This year, we’re stepping on the gas again. We are making continued coverage improvements and launching an advanced LTE network
I've got more phones than fingers
Considering AT&T might have a similar deal for Lower 700 B and C from Verizon lined up soon?Originally Posted by Kies
Only way AT&T is played for fools is if T-Mobile senior management wakes up and makes a grab for 700. I just don't see that. Sad because 700 would really help out T-Mobile in the coverage department.
Last edited by fraydog; 06-26-2012 at 05:39 AM.
Fiber backhaul for Verizon in Southern Illinois in 2013 - about time.
Post Machine
But 700 from where? T-Mobile allowed Qualcomm, AT&T, and Verizon to buy the 700Mhz spectrum, that was being sold. Only way, is if someone else has 700MHz and T-Mobile offers them a price.
Wouldn't the lower 700MHz spectrum that AT&T has, be better for reception, compared to Verizon's upper 700 "750" band?
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _________
Speed achieved using T-Mobile Samsung GS2
I have a blue tooth
Particularly since backhaul upgrade is a necessary prerequisite for either LTE or WCDMA upgrades.
Donald Newcomb
I have a blue tooth
Coming from someone using at&t service , because we know how efficient at&t is....
Sent from my DROID RAZR
Radiation is good
Nationally AT&T will work better because of the vast amount of HSPA+.
Im in a very populated part of Houston and while other people are getting slow speeds i am getting great speeds.
- Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note on AT&T 4G
I have a blue tooth
Yes, they have 0% LTE deployment and 0% LTE coverage. Wow! That's fast!
Even lowly MetroPCS has more LTE coverage than T-mobile does!
I've climbed a cellphone tower
Lol because their coverage area is maybe 7 cities? And they made it their goal T-mobile wasn't forced to LTE like sprint verizon and metro because their network can be upgraded and isn't at its limits capacity wise.
I've got more phones than fingers
No expert here but it seems Tmo has advantages over Sprint even w/o LTE.
I've climbed a cellphone tower
Yeah there was a screen shot of their LTE speeds in Atlanta an it matched DC-HSPA speeds. I was really surprised.
Radiation is good
Actually Sprint and CDMA carriers could have easily upgraded to EVDO Rev. B which is the speed equivalent of HSPA+
- Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note on AT&T 4G
I've climbed a cellphone tower
It wouldn't have been backward compatible like hspa
Phone Collector
Metros LTE is nothing to brag about at most your looking at 3 to 6mbps down on a good day. LTE doesn't automatically equal fast data speeds or consistency it's how it's set up.
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX 2 using HowardForums
I've got more phones than fingers
Tmo data speeds are pretty impressive. My friends phone consistently gets 17+ down almost all the time. I couldn't say the same for my iPhone.
Phone Collector
Agreed. If it was available here I would would probably be with them now unfortunately I live out in the country.
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX 2 using HowardForums
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks