Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Expansion plans now shown on Mobilicity's official coverage map

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    236
    Feedback Score
    0

    Expansion plans now shown on Mobilicity's official coverage map

    Take a look at http://mobilicity.ca/coverage-map/

    White Rock is now officially in the coverage area only a year or two after towers were installed!

    I'm kind of disappointed that Mobi doesn't seem to be doing more in the South Surrey area though. Even inside the southern edges of the current Mobi coverage zone you find fairly lousy coverage as can be seen on coverage mapper, though Highway 10 sees a lot of traffic.

    Some of the updates seem a bit sloppy, particularly around Edmonton. e.g. if they cover Highway 2 to down to Leduc it would seem likely that their towers would cover a lot more area than basically just the road as is currently indicated (and with Highway 99 in the Vancouver area I'd imagine that their coverage is like to extend somewhat more south). Also, do the denser areas around Sherwood Park that Mobilicity is likely to cover really extend that far east?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    912
    Feedback Score
    0
    Nice catch Dave. I too am disappointed about the lack of south Surrey officialness and the orphaned Langley areas.

    Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    351
    Carrier
    Mobilicity
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluenote73 View Post
    Nice catch Dave. I too am disappointed about the lack of south Surrey officialness and the orphaned Langley areas.

    Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
    Yeah. I thought they would have made additions and add towers too Langley area

    Sent from my HTC Panache using HowardForums

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    1,077
    Feedback Score
    0
    huh. I thought they would have extended their Toronto coverage to Niagara Falls at least. That seems to be the common ground for carriers. Well, perhaps in the next round of expansion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    616
    Phones
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    Motorola Dext (CM7.1)
    Sony Ericsson TM506 (Green)
    Carriers
    Wind Mobile
    Feedback Score
    0
    To be honest, I'm underwhelmed. I certainly wouldn't call this "massive" expansion. With the possible exception of a small chunk in Edmonton, I don't see any of their markets where their coverage matches Wind. In a lot of areas the expansion seems oddly haphazard, and I don't see any expansion at all in Calgary. They've had a year to work on this, and this is the best they can do?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,126
    Carrier
    Rogers Communications Inc.
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave114 View Post
    Some of the updates seem a bit sloppy, particularly around Edmonton. e.g. if they cover Highway 2 to down to Leduc it would seem likely that their towers would cover a lot more area than basically just the road as is currently indicated (and with Highway 99 in the Vancouver area I'd imagine that their coverage is like to extend somewhat more south). Also, do the denser areas around Sherwood Park that Mobilicity is likely to cover really extend that far east?
    the Edmonton zone is interesting. they go well east of Sherwood Park, but yet leave the extreme West and South end of Edmonton out of their expansion plans.
    looks to me like it was a quick photoshop job someone did to "update" the coverage map.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    987
    Feedback Score
    0
    huh. I thought they would have extended their Toronto coverage to Niagara Falls at least. That seems to be the common ground for carriers. Well, perhaps in the next round of expansion.
    I would think next round as well. If they show too large of an area for future expansion, it would take forever to complete and then we would start to complain about that. To me future expansion means within a one year timeframe. Let's see if it is anywhere near that.

    Sent from my Nexus S using HowardForums

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    48
    Feedback Score
    0
    Pretty pathetic expansion plans for Vancouver. Nevertheless, better than nothing.

    It would probably take 5 towers or less to cover the expanded zones in Vancouver.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    236
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by e-man View Post
    huh. I thought they would have extended their Toronto coverage to Niagara Falls at least. That seems to be the common ground for carriers. Well, perhaps in the next round of expansion.
    Didn't it take Wind a while to extend out from Hamilton to Niagara Falls? I don't think that they got there right away.

    Quote Originally Posted by BadgerRFD View Post
    Pretty pathetic expansion plans for Vancouver. Nevertheless, better than nothing.

    It would probably take 5 towers or less to cover the expanded zones in Vancouver.
    I'm just hoping that some unofficial South Surrey expansion happens either as part of strengthening the existing zones or just adding in a new tower or two there anyways. e.g. Wind has a tower just south of Cloverdale which seems to actually supply signal basically up to 32nd ave, even though it's still not officially in the coverage area.

    In Calgary, adding a tower in the Tuscany or Springbank areas would seem to in practice be expansion, even if that area is currently officially in the coverage zone.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    48
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave114 View Post
    I'm just hoping that some unofficial South Surrey expansion happens either as part of strengthening the existing zones or just adding in a new tower or two there anyways. e.g. Wind has a tower just south of Cloverdale which seems to actually supply signal basically up to 32nd ave, even though it's still not officially in the coverage area.
    Coverage in south surrey is indeed very spotty as it is not in their official coverage map. I tried using my phone while on 176 St southbound towards the border. No dropped calls, but I never get full bars.

    What surprises me is that Pitt Meadows will be covered, but not Maple Ridge right next to it. There are way more people residing in Maple Ridge than Pitt Meadows.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    236
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BadgerRFD View Post
    What surprises me is that Pitt Meadows will be covered, but not Maple Ridge right next to it. There are way more people residing in Maple Ridge than Pitt Meadows.
    I'd imagine that the idea is to cover Maple Ridge eventually, but that few people there would sign up without Pitt Meadows being covered first so that they'd have coverage when leaving their community. To get equivalent coverage to Wind in Pitt Meadows would seem to require building only 2-4 towers in that vinicity it would appear judging from Loxcell's tower list.

Similar Threads

  1. Wind mobile - kw official coverage map released
    By dorima in forum WIND Mobile
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-16-2011, 11:30 PM
  2. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 06:07 PM
  3. Do you plan to leave T-Mobile because of coverage?
    By XXLiL d3nNiSxX in forum T-Mobile
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11-21-2005, 06:32 PM
  4. T-Mobile To Go Coverage Map
    By dot_null in forum General Prepaid discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-21-2005, 02:08 PM
  5. T-Mobile Business Plans Now on Website
    By jdavid in forum T-Mobile
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-01-2002, 08:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks