AT&T definitely not carrying the 32gb Samsung galaxy s3? :(

[Im_A_Drunk]

I was just wondering if any of the US carriers may release the 64gb S3 later this year ? And also to see if AT&T will carry the 32gb version at all ? Thanks so much for your help !
L

[veriztd]

Even if they don't carry the 32 gb model, most phones can use removable memory cards (micro-SD typically) so it really shouldn't be a problem for most users. I have seen 16 and 32 gb micro-SD cards in many electronics stores for under $100.

[JR1]

At&t is only getting the 16 gig version. I put a 32 gig card in mine and it will support 64 gig cards. My 32 was less than $20.

[Lily933]

I put a 64GB microSD in and it was recognized with no issues.

[studjatt]

I was just wondering if any of the US carriers may release the 64gb S3 later this year ? And also to see if AT&T will carry the 32gb version at all ? Thanks so much for your help !
L

A 32 GB Class 10 card would cost you $35 on amazon, class 4 cards are even cheaper at $20.

[stoobie-doo]

There is a big down side to only being able to get the 16GB version; the Galaxy S III does not natively implement Apps2SD, and many apps can't point their data (I'm looking at you email and Chrome) to the external SD card.

[zephxiii]

There is a big down side to only being able to get the 16GB version; the Galaxy S III does not natively implement Apps2SD, and many apps can't point their data (I'm looking at you email and Chrome) to the external SD card.

It shouldn't be *that* big of a deal though. I am using a Nexus One that doesn't have anything compared to that 16gb and I get by fine....though with low space warning lol.....16gb shouldn't be a problem!

Sent from my Nexus One using HowardForums

[ilvla2]

U.S. Cellular is getting the 32 GB version in, you'd think big ole AT&T would too.

[Morphling27]

There is a big down side to only being able to get the 16GB version; the Galaxy S III does not natively implement Apps2SD, and many apps can't point their data (I'm looking at you email and Chrome) to the external SD card.

I don't disagree more storage is bad - price aside and all that.

Did Samsung disable apps to sd card? I thought this was included in the core of Android since 2.2? Why would Samsung change that?

[stoobie-doo]

I don't disagree more storage is bad - price aside and all that.

Did Samsung disable apps to sd card? I thought this was included in the core of Android since 2.2? Why would Samsung change that?

Pick any link from https://encrypted.google.com/search?...ient=firefox-a and you will see

[ItnStln]

U.S. Cellular is getting the 32 GB version in, you'd think big ole AT&T would too.

But it'll compete with the 32GB iPhone!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk