13. Exclusion and Limitation of Liability (a) TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, YOU AGREE THAT WE WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON IN ANY EVENT FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, MORAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR HARM TO BUSINESS, LOSS OF INFORMATION OR DATA, LOSS OF PROFIT, SAVINGS OR REVENUE OR FAILURE TO REALIZE EXPECTED PROFIT OR SAVINGS OR OTHER NON-DIRECT, COMMERCIAL OR ECONOMIC LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND) UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY, EVEN IF WE HAVE BEEN
ADVISED OF OR COULD REASONABLY FORESEE THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE OR LOSS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE ARISING FROM OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SERVICES, HANDSETS OR EQUIPMENT, THE FAILURE OR UNAVAILABILITY OF THE SERVICES, HANDSETS OR EQUIPMENT, THE USE OF THE SERVICES, HANDSETS OR EQUIPMENT OR ANY UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION, THEFT, LOSS, CORRUPTION OR DESTRUCTION OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION OR DATA.
Unlimited Canada-wide calling, 2500 sent SMS - $35; 6GB Data - $30 less $10; Call Fwd/xfr - N/C; Local UMA - N/C; Value Pak - $10
One has to wonder if you could have approached the situation better, but apparently in most of your posts on HowardForums, you seem to go around and just flat out attack and name call. I'm sure if I followed your example I would be "normal" right?
You think I need the breather? You're the one who magically appears from time to time foaming at the mouth to personally bash people here. Kind of odd advice coming from you, I'll be sure to take it with a grain of salt. I know my ideas and discussions are not popular with everyone, but heck if I ever resort first to the name calling, as you've shown.
Furthermore, you contributed nothing useful or on topic or even on the off-topic topic in this thread. You jump in to just call me names. Noted again, great lead of example there.
Any further discussion of a "breather"; you can always contact a moderator. I've been open in the past to try and resolve my discrepancies and avoid confusion as you've displayed, but I also have to accept that maybe my writing style just isn't for everyone. In which case, feel free to ignore me. It's in your settings.
I was going to PM you, but I think your style is make a big scene of which you had little to nothing to do with; and disappear into obscurity until your next personal attack.
Here is an update to show to the wind fanboys that I am not a Koodo fan!
I tried to use my Capital One CC to pay for my 1st bill for Koodo and when I went to do it online it was declined! and when I tried to do pre-auth payment it was also declined .. so I called Koodo and they said that because my Capital One CC is foreign and not Canadian thats why it did not work and they would need to register it manually and call Capital One to verify that I am indeed the same person!
WIND and Fido and any other place I visited in Canada or online accepted the card no problem! in fact the card is canadian!
now, do I bash Koodo ... no! they might have some sort of BS billing system in place but that aint a biggie IMO ...
so this shows you that even with Koodo, I got some BS excuse!
Sent from my Nexus S using HowardForums
Still waiting for the usual "Stick to the Topic" comment from anybody...please don't make me be the scapegoat here....
Wind threads always seem to hold a lot of action on HoFo, reminds of the old Bell & Rogers threads from the past.