Wirelessly posted (don't hate, procreate: Nokia6230/2.0 (04.28) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
Not to diss your pics or anything but i've seen better from the phone
|
|
|
|
|
|
TM150 pix for those who want to compare:
All of these shots where taken at fine quality/megapixel mode, no other features were used(i.e. daytime/night, delay, etc.), and of course resolution was not reduced in any way, only some shots where rotated so 56kers beware:
Steady shots taken outdoors:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Rolling shots taken outdoors:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Indoor shot:
![]()
Wirelessly posted (don't hate, procreate: Nokia6230/2.0 (04.28) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
Not to diss your pics or anything but i've seen better from the phone
Cool photos!
Apart from the lens flare from the sun, and a little bluring on the flowers, I think they look really good. The hood of the car and sky are really smooth without any wierd artifacts.
Don't be afraid to turn the brightness down if there's a lot of light or the picture is bright, like when you are outside, or even inside sometimes. That'll actually make the colors richer and reduce overexposure. (Press the down arrow in camera mode.)
Also, if the image looks like it's going to be complicated, like those flowers, then try Fine mode. If you do, the camera will really try hard not to over-compress the image. Actually, I use Fine mode all the time, although it can take longer to save.
I think you'll find that if you print those out on 4 x 6, they'll look great.
Thanks all. And please it doesn't matter if you like/dislike them, that what I posted it for for you guys to compare.
I just learned about that brightness feature when i posted, I will tinker around with it some more. I own a 3.2MP cam and of course those pics are better than the TM150. But the quality is really not bad at all for a cell phone![]()
Bookmarks