• Commentary and Analysis

    by Published on 06-05-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Carriers

    So the Computex trade show just wrapped up in Taipei, Taiwan, and if you believe Engadget the age of the embedded SIM is upon us. The world's four biggest PC vendors—Lenovo, HP, Dell and ASUS—have all pledged to build Windows machines (presumably laptops) with eSIM support. It's a bit odd if you think about it; while an embedded SIM makes sense in a tight space like a smartwatch a laptop would has plenty of room for a traditional SIM card. But apparently Intel is developing an eSIM that provides a persistent gigabit data connection over LTE.

    So are eSIMs inevitable for smartphones as well? I sure hope not. My problem with embedded SIMs is that they force the user to cede control of their data connection to someone else.

    For the last decade or so every mobile phone I've owned has been free of carrier locks—meaning that right out of the box I could insert my SIM card of choice, and as long as my carrier's bands were supported I'd be good to go. As an added bonus I've also been able to remove said SIM card and gift or sell my hardware to someone else when I'm done with it, so that they can do the same.

    With an eSIM the user has to select and/or change their carrier through software, which doesn't sound like a big deal but is nonetheless an additional barrier between you and your connection. A software interface gives a third party the power to block a carrier or even a specific plan from your electronic property. At best an eSIM provides multiple, competing interests a means to make your device worse. Don't believe me? Look no further than the Apple SIM; when it launched in 2014 AT&T used it to lock users to that network, while Verizon banned it altogether. That dream of having carriers competing to give you a data connection didn't exactly pan out.

    It might be a minor inconvenience having to deal with APNs, SIM card trays and ejector tools, but I'm still a big fan of physical SIMs. In fact, I'd take dual-SIM support over an eSIM any day of the week.

    Links: Engadget
    by Published on 05-12-2017 07:15 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Devices,
    3. Commentary and Analysis

    The Hacker News did up this fancy new graphic for what is ultimately an old problem. That problem? OnePlus doesn't use a secure channel to deliver OTA updates. Instead of HTTPS or TLS your stock OnePlus device will check for and receive software updates over plain old HTTP.

    The specific flaws are as follows:

    Exactly what I wrote above, that OnePlus OTAs are not delivered in a secure manner. This flaw makes the next three attacks possible.

    An additional fly in the ointment: Because all OTA updates from OnePlus are signed with the same key, it's possible to disguise a downgrade as an upgrade, making the target less secure.

    Because of that shared key it's also possible to disguise a Hydrogen OS OTA as an Oxygen one, and vice versa.

    Again with the shared key... it's also possible to remotely inject a OTA meant for a OnePlus X onto a OnePlus One, and vice versa.

    Keep in mind that for any of this to work the attacker would have to be on the same network as you, and you yourself would have to approve the incoming update on your device. But the fact remains that these vulnerabilities wouldn't exist at all if OnePlus used HTTP or TLS to check for and deliver updates.

    I'll add to this that the company should also be quicker to update the factory images on their site. I understand and can appreciate their practice of rolling out OTAs by region, but I see too many users on reddit and their forums installing updates from dodgy sources, like some random person's MEGA account.

    Sources: Aleph Security via The Hacker News

    by Published on 05-11-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Devices,
    3. Commentary and Analysis

    I'm always fascinated by the mobile phone culture of other countries, be it the die-hard keitai users of Japan or the magic of M-Pesa mobile payments across great swaths of Africa. A couple of summers ago I linked to the XDA Atlas, providing some fantastic insight into that site's worldwide user base. This past week on r/Android a redditor from India posted about the peculiarities of using a smartphone in that country. I thought it would be interesting to share a few highlights, so here they are...

    First off, it would seem that most Indian smartphone users are on prepaid plans. That in itself isn't so unusual, until you consider that dual-SIM support is a must-have feature for them. The redditor explains why:

    Telenor's call rates are dirt cheap, but its data speed is bad. On the other hand, Airtel has good data speeds, but its call rate is way more than Telenor's. So many people use Telenor for calling and Airtel for data, getting the best of both without shelling out double the money.
    Dual-SIM phones will never be popular here in the west because carriers will never sell them—more specifically, they'll never undercut themselves by giving their customers the option of a second provider on the same device. That's definitely an advantage of a prepaid market, that users can easily obtain unlocked phones with dual-SIM support.

    The bad news with prepaid—for India, at least—is that SMS is much more expensive. According to the redditor users have largely abandoned it in favour of data-driven alternatives like WhatsApp and Nimbuzz. Remember Nimbuzz? That former XMPP aggregator is now its own proprietary service, the most popular one on the subcontinent, apparently.

    To find out which smartphones are popular in India and more, check out the reddit thread immediately below. Dual-SIMs ftw!

    Source: r/Android

    by Published on 05-09-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Apps

    Cool, they turned Google Keep into an operating system. </s>

    Seriously, this is what Mountain View is calling Armadillo, the UI layer of a mobile OS called Fuchsia, which could one day replace Android. And here's Ron Amadeo of Ars Technica with his best attempt to explain what's going on:

    Above the profile section are a bunch of cards labeled "Story [something]." The readme describes stories as "a set of apps and/or modules that work together for the user to achieve a goal." That seems pretty close to a recent apps list, maybe (eventually) with some kind of grouping feature. Tapping on any card will load it as a full-screen interface, and since one is labeled "email," it's pretty obvious that these are apps.

    Perhaps this video demo, where the grabbed screen comes from, will enlighten us:

    Nope, still not getting it.

    But hey, if you want to try Fuchsia and Armadillo for yourself Kyle Bradshaw, the author of the video, has compiled an .apk of Armadillo that you can install and run on your Android device.

    Me? Nah, I'm good.

    My derision for Google's latest flight of fancy stems from the project's proprietary nature. At present all the sources for Fuchsia are available on Github, which is great. But here's the bad news: if it ever sees a commercial release Fuchsia won't run on the Linux kernel but instead an in-house microkernel with a less-open software license. Which means no kernel sources. Which means no custom ROMs. Which means no thanks.

    Source: Hotfix IT via Ars Technica

    by Published on 04-26-2017 10:15 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    Except for this guy, apparently...

    I took this photo Tuesday evening in the ANA Lounge at Haneda Airport while waiting for my flight home. To be fair, it's entirely possible that the subject of the photo doesn't read Japanese, English, Chinese or Korean. And perhaps if I had put the sign within his field of view instead of hoarding it for my photo opp I might not have had to endure half of his conversation for twenty minutes. But that's not my point—my point here is that indiscretions like this really stand out in Japan, because the mobile manners of Japanese people are generally very good.

    Fans of Top Gear might remember this episode where Richard Hammond is shushed on the Shinkansen for taking a call on speaker phone:

    (If the time stamp didn't work scrub ahead to 5 minutes and 2 seconds...)

    There are signs all over bullet trains—in English—asking people not to use their mobile phones, which reasonable people understand to mean to not use them for voice calls, and certainly not voice calls using your phone's loudspeaker. It may seem harsh, but I was able to enjoy a two-hour train ride to Kyoto and back on a crowded train that to my North American ears seemed nearly silent.

    So what do Japanese people do when they want to call someone in a public or shared space? They seek somewhere to make their call that's away from other people so as to not disturb them. Crazy, I know... In the case of my airport lounge at Haneda there is a defined area specifically for people to make voice calls. Conversely, at a transit lounge in Vancouver the girlfriend and I had to seek out the only tiny corner where people were asked not to use their phones.

    As the jet lag wanes I will gradually become reaccustomed to walking down the street surrounded by people yelling into their phones, at their smartwatches, at Google, Siri, at each other and at no one in particular. If you live in a big city all this is perfectly normal—unless that city happens to be in Japan. If you ever want to give your ears a break, to hear what good mobile manners sounds like, you should check it out!

    by Published on 04-13-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    Here's an infographic from Vocativ showing a geographic breakdown of IMSI catchers (also known as stingrays) used by various police forces across the USA. According to the accompanying story there are at least 471 such devices used by law enforcement agencies across the nation. In Canada, a CBC investigation has revealed widespread use of IMSI catchers by local police forces and the RCMP.

    But despite their widespread use, police are reluctant to talk about these cell tower-spoofing devices, in some cases lying about their very existence. There's good reason for that.

    First and foremost is the legal issue. Given the power of an IMSI catcher to indiscriminately capture communications from every cellular device within range, they're understandably illegal for civilians to own and operate. But here's something that may surprise you: police use might be illegal as well. Defence lawyers in Canada have argued that the RCMP violated the Radiocommunications Act by using unregistered devices that interfere with public airwaves. As for their deployment across the United States, Vocativ notes that the legality of stingrays is still being "figured out" by the court system there. It doesn't help that agencies who purchase IMSI catchers must often sign an NDA agreement with the companies that provide them; this has, in part, historically led to police denying their possession of them.

    Equally troubling is the potential for mass surveillance. In the USA only a handful of states—including California, Utah, Virginia, and Washington—require a warrant for IMSI catcher use. In Canada Chief Superintendent Jeff Adam told the CBC that the RCMP "does not collect voice and audio communications, email messages, text messages, contact lists, images, encryption keys or basic subscriber information." But there is currently zero oversight to hold that police force to account. You tell us that, unlike the NSA, you don't collect or store bulk interceptions, and we're supposed to believe you, just because?

    Here's my real problem with IMSI catchers: how would you self-censor your own communication knowing that at any moment the police could be listening in?

    Sources: CBC (1) (2), Globe and Mail, Vocativ

    by Published on 04-11-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    As I wrote last week, AI (or what currently passes for it) is the latest innovation for smartphones, with Apple, Google, even Samsung getting in on the action. From the perspective of the other two, Google has the enviable problem of already knowing so much about the people who use its services—which begs the question: How can they possibly maintain some semblance of privacy for users, while collecting ever more data from them?

    The answer is what Mountain View is calling "federated learning". Google published a research paper and blog post on the subject, which I found through VICE Motherboard. Here's the latter to explain the concept:

    Normally, AI training has to be done with all of the data sitting on the one server. But with federated learning, the data is spread across millions of phones with a tiny AI sitting on all of them, learning the user's patterns of use. Instead of the raw data being sent to a Google training server, the phone AI transmits an encrypted "update" that only describes what it's learned, to Google's main AI where it's "immediately" aggregated with the updates from every other phone.
    The researchers maintain that the update isn't stored anywhere on its own, and thus cannot be linked with the individual user who provided it. Read more about federated learning at the links directly below.

    Source: Google Research Blog via VICE Motherboard

    by Published on 04-06-2017 07:15 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    Android Police reported yesterday that Ubuntu Phone—that is, the smartphone version of the popular Ubuntu Linux distribution—is dead. While technically correct, that's not the whole story; what's really happening is that Ubuntu is abandoning Unity, their in-house desktop environment that also happens to run on smartphones and tablets.

    The idea started as Ubuntu for Android way back in 2012, three years before Microsoft's Continuum and five years before Samsung's DeX. And now Ubuntu is dropping it altogether and moving on. You could argue that Ubuntu smartphones never had a chance in a world dominated by Apple and Google, and you'd be right—but you also need to consider the bigger picture. If there was ever an addressable market for phone/computer convergence it would be Linux geeks, but even amongst them I've seen zero evidence of widespread adoption. If you really think about it, it's not hard to see why.

    "Hey man, can I unplug the monitor, keyboard and mouse from your computer so I can use my phone instead?"

    In an age of Chromebooks, Ultrabooks and cloud computing that just ain't gonna happen. Ever.

    As an Ubuntu user myself I'm genuinely bummed that Ubuntu Phone is no more—I didn't much care for the iteration I tested but I recognize that, for a very niche audience who genuinely care about Free/Libre software, it would have been a welcome alternative to the bigger players. But let's be real here, getting phones to do double duty as desktop computers is ultimately a waste of time and effort for everybody.

    Sources: Android Police (1) (2), Howard Forums, PC Mag, The Verge

    by Published on 04-03-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    Despite the photo—here's more on the subject if you're interested—there are no late-breaking April Fool's Day jokes here... just three predictions from a Business Insider piece on the inevitable post-smartphone world. As beloved as our connected pocket computers may be, it shouldn't be too much of a stretch to imagine a future where they're as clunky and cumbersome to the user as a mainframe computer would be in a home office today.

    Short Term

    Digital assistants will likely end up usurping the app as the primary means for human-to-machine communication—web searches, map directions, that kind of thing. If you think about it, funneling such interactions into a single channel makes a lot more sense than searching for relevant information across disparate apps.

    My problem with digital assistants is that you must interact with them by voice; that's fine for your home or car, but I'm not especially jazzed about living in a world where everyone is walking around mumbling into an earpiece like in the movie Her.

    Medium Term

    I could instantly see the power of augmented reality when I first tried an AR app on my Symbian-powered phone in 2010. The problem is that no one wants to walk around having to hold their phone of front of their face to better understand the world around them. I was pretty excited about Google Glass until I actually came face to face with someone wearing it—there are obvious privacy concerns when you're wearing a camera on your face.

    I think the Snap Spectacles have addressed that problem well with their rather obvious recording light. Wouldn't it be great if the lenses on those things could also project AR data to the person wearing them?

    Someone, somewhere is going to figure this out; when they do I see no reason why augmented reality glasses couldn't supplant the smartphone as we know it today.

    Long Term

    Elon Musk has already co-founded a company with the eventual goal of attaching a networked computer directly to your brain. As inconceivable as this may sound today, Musk believes that the development of this technology is imperative to keep humanity competitive in the age of true artificial intelligence. Way to stay positive, Elon.

    Read more at the source directly below.

    Source: Business Insider

    by Published on 03-29-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Devices,
    3. Commentary and Analysis

    A bold proclamation that I made at the start of 2017 is still holding up almost three months later; traditional watchmakers are announcing more and more of the best-looking smartwatches, putting similar efforts by the likes of Huawei and LG to shame. Yes, I'm deliberately conflating "best-looking" with "best" here—if you're fretting about how much RAM your smartwatch has, you're doing it wrong.

    Look instead to the new Android Wear models announced at the Baselworld trade show in Switzerland this past week. Movado, Diesel, Montblanc... all great-looking watches with first-party customizable faces and—surprise!—the added utility of notifications on your wrist. It's as much jewellery as it is tech, and that's not at all a bad thing.

    It might not be enough to win back folks who've given up on wearing a wristwatch altogether, nor entice those who've never worn one in the first place. On the other hand (pun intended), not every watch-wearer cares about monitoring their heart rate or even tracking their steps—there are plenty of Fitbits for that. For the serious watch fan in the market for a good-looking timepiece with notification support, 2017 looks to be a very good year. Just do yourself a favour and set the fashion bar a little higher than your local Best Buy.

    Source: XDA

    by Published on 03-28-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Apps

    Here's British Home Secretary Amber Rudd telling the BBC how law enforcement needs access to WhatsApp. A lone attacker who killed four people and injured fifty more in London last week apparently accessed the messaging service just before the attack began.

    The pertinent sound bite from Ms. Rudd:

    "It is completely unacceptable, there should be no place for terrorists to hide. We need to make sure that organisations like WhatsApp, and there are plenty of others like that, don't provide a secret place for terrorists to communicate with each other."
    The issue is, of course, that WhatsApp deployed end-to-end encryption across its platform in late 2014. That date is not insignificant; the Snowden revelations of 2013—that is, the indiscriminate spying of citizens by the NSA, GCHQ and other Five Eyes partners—are at least partly responsible for the rise of encrypted messaging, and indeed the full disk encryption now standard on both Android and iOS.

    To believe that compromising WhatsApp will immediately make the world safer is more than a bit naive; The Independent ran a recent story on the former computer security chief for the UK's Ministry of Defence, who points out rather obviously that those wishing to spread terror will just move on to something else.

    Sources: BBC News, The Independent

    by Published on 03-27-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Apps

    So Nintendo's Super Mario Run finally came to Android last week. For some reason it's not yet available to Canadians but no worries, eh? You can download and install the official Android package from APK Mirror. Only problem is that if you do that, especially on a rooted Android device, you will eventually be locked out of the game and presented with the error message above.

    A Google search of support code 804-5100 yielded this possible fix:

    1. Download/install a (root) file manager app from the Play store and open it.
    2. Go to the following directory on your device’s internal storage — /data/data/com.nintendo.zara
    3. You'll see the deviceAccount:.xml file inside the folder, delete this file.
    4. Open the Super Mario Run game again and sync it with your Nintendo account.
    Not sure what syncing the game to a Nintendo account has to do with anything, but I dutifully followed the instructions above and was still locked out of the game.

    In one sense it's no big deal, because Super Mario Run seems to be a pretty average gaming experience at best. Before I was locked out I got the thrill of playing through two plodding tutorial levels and sitting through a bunch of cut scenes that I couldn't skip through—nothing at all like the best mobile games I've played where you're dumped right in to the action and have to figure things out as you go.

    In another sense, however, it represents yet another attack from the bad guys in the war on general purpose computing, just like Pokémon GO. It's fairly arrogant to presume that someone would root their Android device for the sole purpose of cheating a game, and in the specific case of Mario I've yet to hear of any such cheat. If it's not root but a geo-blocking issue, that would only make sense if Nintendo was trying managing the load on their servers—because, if you didn't know, this particular game title requires a persistent data connection to work.

    Whatever the case, if you're an Android user with root don't bother wasting your time on Super Mario Run. You've likely got better, more important things to do with your device.

    Links: Cory Doctorow, Howard Forums, The Android Soul

    by Published on 03-23-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Carriers

    Canadian Finance Minister Bill Morneau (seen above) released his government's 2017 budget yesterday, and at least two sources that I follow for digital rights in this country have already expressed concern over a vague passage contained therein. Here is that passage:

    To ensure that Canadians continue to benefit from an open and innovative Internet, the Government proposes to review and modernize the Broadcasting Act and Telecommunications Act. In this review, the Government will look to examine issues such as telecommunications and content creation in the digital age, net neutrality and cultural diversity, and how to strengthen the future of Canadian media and Canadian content creation.
    What does it mean? According to Peter Nowak and Professor Michael Geist, lobbying, lobbying and more lobbying by those in the pocket of Canada's carriers and ISPs.

    Nowak concedes that with broadcast and telecom now effectively sharing the same series of tubes it no longer makes sense to separate the legislation governing them. However, a review of this country's enviable net neutrality rules is entirely unnecessary, duplicating work already done by the CRTC.

    Dr. Geist adds to this the looming spectre of ISP and/or Netflix taxes, channeling even more money back into our operators—who are, in case you forgot, also our broadcasters—all while foreign sources fund more English language Canadian television than ever before. Geist also points to the coming renegotiation of NAFTA, and its implications for Canada's digital policy.

    Read more at the links directly below...

    Sources: Michael Geist, Peter Nowak

    by Published on 03-16-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Apps

    The inspiration for today's post comes from a story this week on ZDNet, about how Pidgin, an IM client for Linux, is unable to support popular platforms like Slack or WhatsApp. This may sound crazy, but not so long ago there was a time when such disparate chat service could all be accessed by the same app.

    For desktop Linux Pidgin did a great job, and for my S60-powered Nokia smartphones of the late 2000s there were even more choices—Fring, IM+ and Nimbuzz each enabled me to connect to Facebook Messenger, Hangouts (then Google Talk) and more, all from a single interface. The magic that made this possible was, in most cases, the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol—XMPP for short.

    So what happened? Facebook XMPP support unofficially ended in the summer of 2015, after their chat API was officially depreciated that spring. The story with Google is a bit more complicated, but boils down to the XMPP-supported Google Talk being supplanted by the non-XMPP-compatible Hangouts.

    And what about those Nokia chat apps? Of the three, Nimbuzz is the only one still in service, now running its own proprietary IM platform and pseudo-VoIP service. Walled gardens, it seems, are the way of the future when it comes to chat.

    Links: Disruptive Telephony, Slashdot, XMPP, ZDNet

    by Published on 03-08-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    Much respect for the team over at XDA this morning; on the very same day that the world received news of new revelations from WikiLeaks they published a thorough, thoughtful and level-headed analysis of what they found. I've yet to see anything this detailed anywhere else on the web.

    It would indeed appear that the CIA has been collecting zero-day exploits for both Android and iOS. The good news is that most of the vulnerabilities affect older hardware and versions of those operating systems. Apple will only say that the exploits relating to their products have been patched. XDA, as you will now see, goes quite a bit further than that.

    Android Exploits
    Dugtrio - remote access vulnerability, affects Android 2.3.6 to 4.2
    Freedriod - affects Android 2.3.6 to 4.2, unreliable in Android 4.3 to 4.4
    Flameskimmer - affects Android 4.4.4, Broadcom WiFi chipset only
    Spearrow - remote info leak, affects Android 4.1.2, possibly unreliable

    App Exploits
    EggsMayhem - affects Chrome versions 32 to 39 (2014)

    Device Exploits
    Colobus - affects HTC One M7, Samsung Galaxy S4 i9505, Sony Xperia Z
    Galago - affects two specific build numbers of Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    Simian - affects Snapdragon 800-powered devices
    Snubble - affects specific builds of Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and Galaxy S4
    Sulfur - affects specific builds of Samsung Galaxy Note 4

    Tweets from whistleblower Edward Snowden indicate that the WikiLeaks information dump is legitimate, and would seem to suggest that the U.S. government—and by extension, its Five Eyes partners—have an ongoing interest in keeping your mobile phone and its software unsafe. If you value your privacy and are using anything cited in this post, now might be the time for a hardware upgrade, or to take that software update at the very least.

    Sources: RT, TechCrunch, XDA Developers

    by Published on 02-10-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    I caught something on Twitter yesterday that has me more than a bit confused. As you may or may not know, this week the CRTC conducted a public hearing this week in review of Canada's Wireless Code. The following excerpt from the hearing was tweeted as a graphic—I did a copy/paste straight from the official transcript.

    For reference, THE CHAIRPERSON is CRTC Chair Jean-Pierre Blais and MS. CARSTEN is Rhonda Carsten, Director of Wireless Marketing for SaskTel.

    4180 THE CHAIRPERSON: Would you agree with me that if phones were more readily unlocked, a consumer rather than getting this $3 a day package from you for roaming in the United States or perhaps a higher price for roaming elsewhere could actually insert a SIM card from a foreign carrier?

    4181 MS. CARSTEN: We do as part of our process that we communicate to customers when they contact us with regards to international roaming and the rates, we do make it available to them to unlock their device. There is that fee associated with it but it is a one-time fee and it is a permanent unlock for that device so that they can do exactly what you reference by picking up a SIM in an international destination and utilizing those local rates that would be cheaper for them.

    4182 THE CHAIRPERSON: So how much is that unlocking fee?

    4183 MS. CARSTEN: It’s the same fee.

    4184 THE CHAIRPERSON: So $50?

    4185 MS. CARSTEN: One time based on the same cost structure that we will provide you with information about.

    4186 THE CHAIRPERSON: So if in December 2016 I was going down to the United States on holidays I’d pay $50 and if I was going 3 months later again and I want to use a SIM card option to manage my fees I’d have to pay another $50; is that correct?

    4187 MS. CARSTEN: No, no, you only pay the one time and then that device is unlocked. And every subsequent trip you make, regardless of what country you go to, you don’t have to pay again to unlock that device. It’s permanently unlocked.

    4188 THE CHAIRPERSON: Even in Canada?

    4189 MS. CARSTEN: Yes.

    4190 THE CHAIRPERSON: So it’s not just a roaming option. You’d be unlocked forever?

    4191 MS. CARSTEN: Correct.
    TL;DR The CRTC doesn't know what SIM-unlocking is...?

    Granted, the person who tweeted this is a known shill for Canada's Big Three carriers, and may well have cherry-picked this specific exchange to make the CRTC look bad. A reply to the tweet additionally pointed out that Mr. Blais in that moment might have been deliberately pedantic—"playing dumb"—to get what might seem like obvious details about SIM-unlocking on record.

    I certainly hope that's the case. If Canada's regulatory telecommunications body doesn't understand a core technology of mobile phones, we're in for a bad time.

    For more on the public hearing see additional comments in this thread.

    Source: CRTC Transcripts via an industry apologist on Twitter

    by Published on 02-09-2017 07:00 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Devices,
    3. Commentary and Analysis

    I've been subscribed to TechAltar for a while now, and was pleased to see one of the videos from that YouTube channel grace the front pages of popular subreddits like r/Android, r/OnePlus and r/Pebble this week. The dude who appears on camera—I think his name is Martin?—clearly knows what he is talking about, and nowhere is this more apparent than in his latest production.

    His theory, in a nutshell, is that serving the tech enthusiast is not a sustainable business.

    He cites two notable examples: Oppo and Pebble. Perpetually a hit with the Kickstarter crowd, Pebble still struggled to find a wider customer base. Distribution through Best Buy and the like, more fashion-conscious designs like the Pebble Round, doubling down on fitness tracking with heart-rate sensors... none of this could ultimately save the company; its geek-cred became a fatal thorn in its side.

    Then there's Oppo, a company that Martin (?) actually worked for in Shenzhen, China for a time. It wasn't all that long ago that Oppo too was an enthusiast brand—as I recall, there was a version of their 2013 N1 that ran CyanogenMod out of the box. But there came a point where the company decided to pivot away from its tech-savvy fanbase and focus on more consumer-friendly products. The result? Oppo is now, according to The Economist, the number one OEM in the world's biggest smartphone market.

    So what's the early adopter to do? TechAltar's advice is to not get too attached to your favourite brand, and be ready to jump to the next thing once it comes along. Hopefully we will always have a next thing to jump to...!

    by Published on 02-06-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis

    I've been sitting on some really good links about Cyanogen, Inc. and its co-founder Steve Kondik for a while now, but have resisted posting them here because together they tell such a sordid and convoluted tale. But it looks like the dust has settled and we finally have closure, so here we go...

    You'll recall that in September of 2013 CyanogenMod, the most popular custom ROM for Android, incorporated into Cyanogen, Inc. Their business model was solid—the rising tide of Chinese-branded smartphones could never even hope to do well in the west with the bloated, ad-ridden software tolerated at home. The new Cyanogen OS made its famous début on 2014's OnePlus One, incorrectly called CyanogenMod 11S by yours truly. And then things got weird.

    Cyanogen, Inc.—or, more accurately, its CEO Kirt McMaster—f**ked over OnePlus when it (he) made an exclusive deal to provide software for Micromax, an Android OEM in India. For a time OnePlus was effectively blocked from selling phones in the world's second largest smartphone market. A few months later McMaster boasted to Forbes that Cyanogen was "putting a gun to Google's head".

    Fast forward to the summer of 2016, where Cyanogen, Inc. decided to get out of the Android ROM business altogether, laying off 20% of its staff and "pivoting" to market the only other intellectual property it had—a scant few customized Android apps.

    The one bright spot through this mess was the continued availability of the free CyanogenMod ROM—that is until Steve Kondik, the founder of the project, told his side of the story to the CM community in an open letter:

    My co-founder [McMaster] apparently became unhappy with running the business and not owning the vision. This is when the "bullet to the head" and other misguided media nonsense started, and the bad business deals were signed. Being second in command, all I could do was try and stop it, do damage control, and hope every day that something new didn't happen. The worst of it happened internally and it became a generally sh**ty place to work because of all the conflict.
    Shortly after posting this, Kondik was fired from the company he himself had started. And shortly after that, the Inc. shut down all the infrastructure that had made the Mod possible.

    But all is not lost: CyanogenMod lives on in the form of Lineage OS, with Kondik and some other key talent running the show. Though ROMs are currently available for only a few devices, many, many more are in the works.

    And what of Cyanogen, Inc., and the CEO that ruined everything? Well, the news from Android Police over the weekend is that McMaster has a new logo on the door of Cyanogen's old HQ, and a smashed Tesla in the parking lot. Talk about a train wreck...

    Sources: Android Police (1) (2) (3)

    by Published on 01-24-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Devices,
    3. Commentary and Analysis

    I'm an Android user and, despite the fanboy graphic you see above, I come in peace.

    Yesterday I came across a list of 10 reasons why people buy iPhones instead of Android phones. As a student of smartphone history it piqued my interest; while it's an inescapable fact that Android is currently the world's most popular computer OS (and that includes Windows on desktop computers), it also seems to be true that in certain parts of the world—Japan, the U.S. and Canada are immediate places that come to mind—you still see more iPhones than Androids in people's hands.

    Why is that?

    There are undoubtedly many answers to this question; I've added my own to the list that I found, and I'm hoping that you'll do the same...

    1. They like iOS better than Android

    I've definitely some firsthand evidence to support this. I remember showing my niece whatever Nexus phone I was using at the time and she promptly handed it back, saying that it was "too confusing". With home screen widgets and app drawers versus screen after screen of app icons (with folders for advanced users) I can appreciate that.

    2. iPhones support all of the apps that most people want

    It's not nearly as much of an issue as it was a few years ago, but with some game titles—Super Mario Run, for example—it's still very much the case.

    3. They’ve heard all kinds of things (true and false) about the security of iOS

    I would think the opposite, that iPhone users have heard all sorts of bad things about Android security. To some extent it's a fair point.

    4. iPhones play well with other Apple devices

    Hey, in for a penny, in for a pound, right?

    In all seriousness, just as the Linux-based Android OS makes for a good fit with my desktop Linux computers, the tight integration between iOS and Mac OS makes a good case for why you'd use both.

    5. They’ve already owned an iPhone

    I'll admit that I completely missed the boat when the iPhone 3G came to Canada; at that time I was still a Mac user, but also a cheerleader for Team Nokia. In fact, I only really bought a Nexus One in 2010 to try out a new carrier (Mobilicity) and also because Nokia decided not to lend me an N8.

    Bad move, Nokia.

    6. iPhones are easy to recognize

    I think what the list is trying to say is that iPhone is a safe, dependable choice—which until Google's Pixel didn't really exist in the Android ecosystem.

    7. iPhones aren’t packed with bloatware added by the carrier

    With a few exceptions Android is guilty as charged; no argument here.

    8. They think an iPhone will last longer than an Android phone

    I would say that the opposite is true—depending on the phone, of course. With a good custom ROM I could still use my 2014 Nexus 5 or OnePlus One as a daily driver if I wanted to.

    9. iPhones seem easier to resell than Android phones

    Can't deny that. I would further say that getting a subsidized iPhone might even be worth locking yourself into a carrier contract if you plan on selling it right away.

    10. They aren’t comparing phones based on raw specifications

    Even if they were, iPhone hardware is made to run iOS, so you'd still have a solid case for the iPhone being the better choice.

    When all is said and done the only really important thing is that you use what's right for you. Nonetheless, any comments you add below will help us Android users understand you better.

    Source: Cheat Sheet

    by Published on 01-17-2017 07:30 AM
    1. Categories:
    2. Commentary and Analysis,
    3. Apps

    I'm very late to the game here, but I finally got around to watching the new season of Black Mirror on Netflix last night. If you've never seen Black Mirror, it's basically Twilight Zone meets the Internet. "Nosedive", the first episode of the show's third season, is set in a dystopian near-future where everyone is constantly being rated by their peers, with very real implications for the goods, services and even people they are able to access.

    If you find such a premise to be a bit far-fetched, you might be surprised to find out that a similar rating system is in use right now in mainland China.

    The Chinese government is calling it "social credit"; as The Washington Post reports, the reasons behind it are fairly pragmatic:

    At the heart of the social credit system is an attempt to control China’s vast, anarchic and poorly-regulated market economy, to punish companies selling poisoned food or phony medicine, to expose doctors taking bribes and uncover con men preying on the vulnerable.
    Here's the scary part: social credit is being expanded from businesses and professionals to the rest of the population. Enrollment in the social credit system could be mandatory as early as 2020.

    One initiative to get China's 700 million Internet users to embrace the idea is Sesame Credit, a joint venture between Alibaba, Tencent and, of course, the Chinese government. I found an excellent analysis of Sesame Credit on, of all places, a YouTube gaming channel:

    If you thought social media was already bad, gamifying obedience will surely make it much, much worse.

    Source: Washington Post

    Page 3 of 24 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... LastLast