I'm excited to see that Sprint is at least announcing their plans rather than "IDEN is a great asset..." or "It makes financial sense to keep IDEN"... we all knew it had to end.
I wonder how many Airaves they are going to have to give out (or CDMA towers they plan on building) for businesses that are in areas that have great IDEN signal, but 0-1 bars on CDMA coming off the same tower.
I know one business in particular that has hung onto IDEN forever simply because "It worked where they told me it would--It doesn't have coverage everywhere, but it works great in all the places they said it would--Nextel was the only company that was honest about that when I signed"
It's going to go over just AWESOME when they say "You won't see any service changes--this will be BETTER" and they get their 5 new CDMA phones and find 0-1 bar of service at the shop, and the same when they are out at customer's houses that are just outside of the 1900 coverage. In fact when I am out there calling on them with my own job, I have had to step outside to get a PCS signal because inside there is *just enough* CDMA to hold onto an unusable signal.
I wonder how many of the IDEN folks are left because of this same reason? Maybe it's a leap, but with 5 million or so left, they are probably the hardcore users that have dealt with the low data speeds (these guys have I1's).
I haven't said anything because I'm curious how this will play out

They have asked me who my provider is, and I say Sprint--and it just doesn't click that there are two networks. *I* get the difference--and have the force roam app--and realize they are missing out on a lot of roaming coverage. But the "average user" doesn't get this--and if you have sold something based on being honest, and knowing the owner, Sprint is going to have one ticked off customer, unless they are prepared to explain such things--including the force roam app. Somehow I think they aren't prepared.
--Nat
Bookmarks