Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 166

Thread: FCC Net Neutrality rules struck down!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    2,334
    Device(s)
    Pixel2 XL iPhone SE
    Carrier(s)
    VZW prepaid, Page Plus
    Feedback Score
    0

    FCC Net Neutrality rules struck down!

    Read it and weep:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...news&tag=title

    The actual ruling:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/199616222/...trality-ruling

    Freepress comment on the ruling:*

    http://www.freepress.net/node/105543

    Freepress online petition to the FCC to restore Net Neutrality:*

    http://act.freepress.net/sign/intern...ourt_decision2

    *thanks to Zappy for Freepress links
    Last edited by taoman; 01-14-2014 at 02:12 PM. Reason: added freepress links

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,948
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yeah and with Verizon being the one to pursue this you best believe they plan on implementing blocked and/or throttled data shortly for services that are not their own. This only seems to go hand in hand with sponsored data that AT&T just announced. Its a matter of when, not if.

    And I guarantee they [Verizon] move faster than lightning. While the FCC or Congress move at a snails pace if they move at all to appeal this ruling or give the FCC more power.


    2014 is gearing up to be the worst year of the [mobile] internet. Sponsored data, net neutrality denied, what next? Sad day indeed...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    2,334
    Device(s)
    Pixel2 XL iPhone SE
    Carrier(s)
    VZW prepaid, Page Plus
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by coorey View Post
    2014 is gearing up to be the worst year of the [mobile] internet. Sponsored data, net neutrality denied, what next? Sad day indeed...
    Agreed. This is really bad news.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    697
    Device(s)
    iPhone 6s
    Carrier(s)
    T-Mobile
    Feedback Score
    0
    Ah, crap. This sucks.
    - acadiel


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,948
    Feedback Score
    0
    And for those that think this may only apply to unlimited data plans... think again. This will eventually mean that not only are we paying for tiered or shared data plans but for Verizon (et all) to ultimately control how we use the limited experience that we're already paying for.

    Anyone who cares how they spend their hard earned money and wants access to the internet unfiltered, you should be spamming the hell out of your local politicians to get involved.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,046
    Feedback Score
    0
    Take action before it is too late!

    http://act.freepress.net/sign/intern...ourt_decision2



    Tell the FCC: Restore Net Neutrality

    An appeals court just dealt the latest blow to the open Internet. The court struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Order because of the questionable legal framework the agency used when it adopted its Net Neutrality rules in 2010.

    This ruling means there is no one who can protect us from ISPs that block or discriminate against websites, applications or services.

    But there’s hope: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler can correct the agency’s past mistakes and truly protect our nation’s communications infrastructure. The agency must take the necessary steps to make broadband networks open, accessible, reliable and affordable for everyone.

    Tell the FCC to start treating broadband like a communications service, and to restore its Net Neutrality rules.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    18,877
    Device(s)
    Apple iPhone7 Plus Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T Mobility
    Feedback Score
    0
    The court ruled that the Federal Communications Commission lacked statutory authority to issue the regulations overturned. Congress has to pass laws giving the Commission such authority.
    Earl F. Parrish

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,396
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T, verizon
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zappy View Post
    Take action before it is too late!

    http://act.freepress.net/sign/intern...ourt_decision2



    Tell the FCC: Restore Net Neutrality

    An appeals court just dealt the latest blow to the open Internet. The court struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Order because of the questionable legal framework the agency used when it adopted its Net Neutrality rules in 2010.

    This ruling means there is no one who can protect us from ISPs that block or discriminate against websites, applications or services.

    But there’s hope: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler can correct the agency’s past mistakes and truly protect our nation’s communications infrastructure. The agency must take the necessary steps to make broadband networks open, accessible, reliable and affordable for everyone.

    Tell the FCC to start treating broadband like a communications service, and to restore its Net Neutrality rules.
    Signed and passed on.


    Sent with the HoFo App

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,046
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by efparri View Post
    Congress has to pass laws giving the Commission such authority.
    The FCC already has the legal authority it needs.

    From the Freepress.net

    The FCC could make all this go away by simply reading the law right and reclaiming the authority it already has to protect Internet users for good.

    During the tenure of former FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the agency made a grave mistake by failing to put its open Internet rules on the most solid legal footing. Internet users will pay the price of that decision unless and until the FCC fixes the problem it created for itself.

    New FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler must correct the agency’s past mistakes and truly protect our nation’s communications infrastructure. The agency must ensure that broadband communications networks are open, accessible, reliable and affordable for everyone. It needs to stop fulfilling the wish lists of the big phone and cable monopolies — and start looking out for Internet users.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    18,877
    Device(s)
    Apple iPhone7 Plus Apple iPhone 7 Plus
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T Mobility
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zappy View Post
    The FCC already has the legal authority it needs.

    From the Freepress.net
    Did you read the ruling by the court? Since the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit is the authoritative court for appeals from agency actions, it is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will hear it. It is the same issue ruled on in the Comcast case a few years ago. Existing law does not give the Federal Communications Commission the authority to regulate non-common carriers.
    http://www.wirelessweek.com/news/201...4&location=top

    Sent with the HoFo App
    Last edited by efparri; 01-15-2014 at 12:25 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,206
    Device(s)
    Apple iPhone X
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zappy View Post
    The FCC already has the legal authority it needs.

    From the Freepress.net
    They really just need to classify Verizon, et al, as a "common carrier" to make the law stick. The legalese of it, and verbiage for parties involved, was their out.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Murland
    Posts
    1,495
    Device(s)
    Nexus 6
    Carrier(s)
    MetroPCS
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Here's a We The People petition:

    http://wh.gov/lIFxo
    nex·us [nek-suhs]
    noun, plural nex·us·es, nex·us.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,753
    Carrier(s)
    Telus $70/20GB (with family discount)
    Feedback Score
    0

    Post Breaking Down Verizon v. FCC

    Name:  verizon-fcc.jpg
Views: 822
Size:  40.1 KB

    Ok, I'm calling it... It's officially a bad week for mobile users in Canada and the USA.

    Earlier this week WIND Mobile surprised everyone by pulling out of Canada's 700MHz spectrum auction a day before it started. As I was gathering my thoughts on that, another bombshell was dropped south of the border: a U.S. Appeals Court invalidated net neutrality rules set by the FCC.

    This decision has potentially dire implications for both broadband and wireless Internet users in America, and beyond. But first, we need to understand exactly what happened...

    Glossary

    Before even that we need to make sure that we're all on the same page with some basic concepts. The premise of net neutrality is fairly simple: all data on the Internet should be treated equally, without any discrimination for type, source or user.

    Where net neutrality applies specifically to the Internet, the very similar concept of common carriage, insofar as it pertains to telecom in the USA, dates back to the FCC's Communications Act of 1934.

    Critically, while common carriage and net neutrality are similar ideas, they are subject to notably different legislation in the United States.

    Just The Facts

    What we're discussing here is The U.S. Court of Appeals ruling on Case No. 11-1355, Verizon v. FCC.

    In 2011 Verizon filed their legal challenge to the FCC's 2010 Open Internet Order. From this very helpful CNET FAQ, the FCC regulations stipulate that (1) broadband providers, whether fixed-line or wireless, must be open and transparent to their customers, and (2) they are prohibited from blocking lawful content on their networks.

    Verizon argued that these rules violated their First Amendment rights, and that the FCC had no authority to impose them in the first place.

    The Appeals Court decision actually upholds the FCC's authority to regulate broadband wireless providers, but at the same time points to a flaw in the agency's classification of such. From the ruling:

    Given that the Commission has chosen to classify broadband providers in a manner that exempts them from treatment as common carriers, the Communications Act expressly prohibits the Commission from nonetheless regulating them as such. Because the Commission has failed to establish that the anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules do not impose per se common carrier obligations, we vacate those portions of the Open Internet Order.
    (This is the quote that most of the big tech blogs are using; I got mine from Gizmodo...)

    In other words, a legal loophole means that Internet providers are no longer accountable to the common carrier legislation that's been on the books since the 1930s.

    Trouble Ahead

    Net neutrality certainly isn't dead, but its future is uncertain. Harbingers of a two-tiered Internet are easy to find: AT&T is currently entertaining the idea of sponsored data on mobile phones, and on the flip-side of the coin Netflix and YouTube could now suffer at the hands of your ISP and/or carrier.

    Canada is not far behind... There's Ben Klass's complaint to the CRTC about Bell violating Net Neutrality with its mobile TV app. And rumours abound that Rogers is planning a Netflix clone, with a two-tiered Internet offering as its ultimate goal.

    Author and Professor Tim Wu warns of an end to the open Internet in his book The Master Switch, an amazing chronicle of how telephone networks, radio, film and television each came to be as a democratizing disruption, only to be bought up and locked down by corporate interests. A similar fate looms over our Internet, unless we speak up and do something about it.

    Further Reading

    Here are some additional sources I used in preparing this post:


    And in the interest of balance, not everybody thinks that the sky is falling:


    A Quick Note to Front Page Readers

    The comments you'll see below aren't necessarily replies to this post; rather than start a new thread I've added these words to an existing one — not to be misleading, but to avoid unnecessary duplication. Do yourself a favour and check out the entire thread.
    My mobile memoirs — free ebook available here.
    My HoFo feedback... is that still a thing?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,753
    Carrier(s)
    Telus $70/20GB (with family discount)
    Feedback Score
    0
    Fwiw, here's a thoughtful response from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, via Muktware:

    EFF is not surprised at the court’s decision. There was much of value in the FCC’s Open Internet Principles, and we still think those principles are a good starting point for conversation. But we were deeply concerned that the FCC was attempting to claim broad authority to regulate the Internet. No government agency should have that authority, so we are glad this decision clarifies that. As we look towards the future, Internet users need to have a pragmatic and open discussion about ways to promote and defend a neutral Internet. In the meantime, ISPs must comply with their transparency obligations so that customers can see if their Internet providers are giving them the non-discriminatory service they expect and deserve.
    They make a good point about a U.S. Government Agency regulating the Internet...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,611
    Device(s)
    N/A
    Carrier(s)
    Verizon Wireless;
    Feedback Score
    0
    A) VZW etc. best realize if they don't give me open internet access, I'm not paying them a penny. And, no, "the web" is not the internet.

    B) Petition the FCC? The FCC supported net neutrality, the court struck it down. This really is a damn shame. Hopefully they can reclassify VZW etc. as common carrier status.

    Sent from my SCH-I405 using HowardForums

Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Judges voice skepticism of FCC net-neutrality rules
    By Zappy in forum Verizon Wireless
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 11-04-2013, 09:02 PM
  2. Court overrules FCC in net neutrality case
    By Isriam in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 10:57 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-25-2009, 01:58 AM
  4. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 11:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks